Suspicious timing, isn't it?
So where can I buy the magazine?
Hahahahahahaha!!! You cannot go against a Beatle in England...certainly NOT!
When will people learn this shit always comes back to haunt you. Surely this types of things don't pay that much. Is it really worth it?
MizRo | 06.05.06 - 11:51 am
EXACTLY!!!!!!
They will skins that Bitch alive.
I'm sure Stella is waging WAR!
More like McCartney's lawyers are leaking to the press.
Shouldn;t he have known that before?
No wonder his kids hate her
Why are these only showing up now? Anyhoo, she's either got a really long torso or her ass is really flat. Haven't seen the other photos so....
Paul INHERITED over 300 Million from his wife Linda Eastman of Eastman/Kodak!
Now she stands to get her hands on some of Linda's $$$$...
She may be a porn slut but she's a rich porn slut.
Stupid Gold Digging Twat!
YSW!!? Bitch is in trouble!!
The Beatles are "royalty". 
umm, I think she looks good in these pictures. *running out*
Ohhhhh, so embarrassing!
These are old pics...He knew about them. So what. She doesnt show any pink.
this is really mean but I wonder if her leg ever goes flying off while filming
Lol I KNOW!!!
The Brits will fuck her up!
the site is all screwed up for me and I can't see shit
1. Who cares?
2. She has aereolas like Tara Reid. Misshapen and nasty-looking.
3. Sir Paul married her. Why does everyone hate on her? If she's a gold-digging bitch then he's an over-the-hill horn-dog douchebag.
This stuff always come back to bite you in the ass.
I still can't get over that Paul didn't have her sign a pre-nup. How dumb or naive can you be?
Interesting. I don't blame his kids for hating her...he married he so quickly after Linda died. I think I'd be harboring some fucking resentment too.
wait nevermind...it was before she lost her leg. But I still wonder
I think Linda Eastman McCartney's father was Lee Eastman, a well known entertainment attorney. I don't think he worked for Eastman Kodak. Heather is bad news and I'm glad Paul broke up with her. I would not mess with his daughter Stella.
£200million,hardcore sex slut,amputee-sign me up,she's my ideal slutmonkey!!
112 pages of all pictures, no text, and she doesn't show any pink??? I seriously doubt it, I'm sure her pink taco is all over the mag.
Funny how just 112 little porno shots of yourself fellating an oil slicked penis can ruin your whole week.
Anonymous | 06.05.06 - 12:01 pm
*shame*
*shame*
*shame*
I know...she went to someone's office protesting about the treatment of animals with some crazy ass PETA folk, and lost her leg in the a scuffle...
*hangs head in shame*
It is often cited that Linda McCartney is related to the Eastman Kodak dynasty. This is a myth and McCartney had no connection with the family, as she herself explained in an interview. [1] Her maiden name of Eastman was an anglicised version of her family's original name, Epstein, coincidentally the same surname as the Beatles' manager Brian.
Just the kind of person who you want married to a Knight of the British Empire.
But then again, being a Knight isn't what it used to be.
Knight In the old days: Slay a Dragon
Knight of Today : sings She Loves me Yeah Yeah Yeah
Bitch needs a bra, stat!
oh well.. you can take the girl out of the ho but you can't take the ho out of the girl....
*searching internet for pics of self*
Hey Miz, Ruby. 
I wonder how many times Stella, has told her dad: I TOLD YOU SO.
GO YANKEES 
it probably just freaks him out to have that limp leg laying there while he pants away.
*ungh ungh ungh* (eyes shooting over to the limp lump under the covers)
You'd think after he saw nipples like those, he'd have run for the hills. *thanks the lord that i don't have her tits*
How the heck did they keep everyone in the dark about this before?????
Kats | 06.05.06 - 12:02 pm
I think being married to Linda for so long insulated him to the ways of some women....plus I'm sure he was lonely too.
Stella is an Alpha Bitch...she's been waging war against this her from Day 1.
I know...she went to someone's office protesting about the treatment of animals with some crazy ass PETA folk, and lost her leg in the a scuffle...
*hangs head in shame*
YSW!!? | 06.05.06 - 12:04 pm |
Wasn't it Jello's offices?
CindyLoo you are right. Linda was NOT a EASTMAN as in PHOTO Eastman. Her dad was a lawyer. Paul knew about the 2nd wives lurid model's past. All this shit came out when they FIRST got married. No biggie.
Morticia | Homepage | 06.05.06 - 12:07 pm |
That's a fucking funny ass visual
Funny how just 112 little porno shots of yourself fellating an oil slicked penis can ruin your whole week.
mishma | 06.05.06 - 12:03 pm | #
Imagine 1 little porno shot of yourself fellating 112 oil slicked penis',that'll ruin your whole life!!
Kats,
I so don't get that. SHE wasn't the one married to their mother for decades - he was. SHE isn't the one the kids may reasonably expect to carry a bit of a torch for Linda - he is. So why resent HER? Why not resent HIM? If there's any "betrayal of Linda's memory," it is HE who is doing it, not she.
Life is for the living, IMO, and if Paul wanted to get married the day after he buried Linda, everyone else should bugger off. Including his spoiled children.
You just know Sir Paul buried this before they got married but now has secretly had them released. What is he? Britain's version of Tomm Cooze?
When you were young and your heart was an open book
You used to say live and let live
(You know you did, you know you did, you know you did)
But if this ever-changing world in which we live in
Makes you give in and cry
Say live and let die
jennifer | 06.05.06 - 12:08 pm
YES! that's it....the mental picture is hilarious...
Linda died in 1998 and he married Heather in 2002. How exactly is that "so soon" after Linda died???
life may be "for the living", but that doesn't mean with disregard for those that you love - especially those in your care (i.e. one's kids)
OakRaiderFan: love YOUR new avatar too!!
My, My, everyone's avatars are so cool - I'm going to get a new one too!
Stella needs to support her Dad at this time, not chastise him. Stella also has many friends that could make life VERRRRRY difficult for Heather. We shall see.
£200million,hardcore sex slut,amputee-sign me up,she's my ideal slutmonkey!!
El Bastardo | 06.05.06 - 12:02 pm | #
Slutmonkey...ha. Coulda been worse. You coulda called her your stubmonkey...that'd be mean lol
Linda died in 1998 and he married Heather in 2002. How exactly is that "so soon" after Linda died???
Anonymous | 06.05.06 - 12:11 pm | #
'cause he started dating heather right after linda died
Eww!
I breast fed TWO babies and my tits are hotter!
gross...
.
Morticia, how is marrying someone almost 4 years after your wife died doing it with disregard for your (grown) children? Shouldn't they want him happy? If banging a decades-younger, loudmouthed amputee made him happy, they should have shut their spoiled mouths about it.
peggy - i wasn't necessarily talking about this situation, i was making a more general statement. i honestly don't know the details of this scenario - but if the kids are grown...absolutely. he should do what makes him happy.
Linda died in 1998 and he married Heather in 2002. How exactly is that "so soon" after Linda died???
Anonymous | 06.05.06 - 12:11 pm | #
Thank you anonymous for posting that. I was just about to post the same thing. I think people get protective over Paul, that he can't think straight, especially since the death of Linda. A lot of men get remarried--and sometimes quickly after the death of a spouse--because they dont want to be alone. Paul waited four years! I think the reason for the divorce was more about the age difference between the two. I'm 35 (Heather Mills is 3 and marrying someone Paul's age would be like me marrying my dad. That's just too much of a generational gap!!
Linda died in 1998 and he married Heather in 2002. How exactly is that "so soon" after Linda died???
Anonymous | 06.05.06 - 12:11 pm | #
His relationship with Heather Mills started in 1999, only a scant year after Linda, his beloved wife of 29 years, died. That is too soon. Just ask all his kids.
Oh, btw, Heather Mills was ENGAGED to someone else when she met Paul. She quickly dumped her fiance.
I still can't get over that Paul didn't have her sign a pre-nup. How dumb or naive can you be?
Cindyloo | 06.05.06 - 12:02 pm | #
Now, someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure prenups aren't really worth the paper they're written on in the UK. I don't believe that they have much legal clout over here.
We love divorcees here! if you want to get rich, marry a rich man in Britain, our courts will give you half of everything he's got, no problem!
LA, with due respect, bullshit. His kids don't have to live in a big, empty house all alone. His kids don't have to sleep with the emptiness that his beloved wife filled for all those years. His kids don't have to be suddenly solo after being a duo for decades.
"Too soon" is what the bereaved feels is too soon, not what his grown-up kids think. If his children were young and had to live with a new "mommy," that might change things. But not in this case.
His relationship with Heather Mills started in 1999, only a scant year after Linda, his beloved wife of 29 years, died. That is too soon. Just ask all his kids.
LA | Homepage | 06.05.06 - 12:19 pm | #
Who says what is an appropriate mourning time? You? Me? Shall we go back to Victorian times? He mourned his wife, he met someone else, they fell in love and got married. Big deal. My mum and I discussed his childrens reaction when he got married and we both agreed they were being very selfish. Their concern should have been their fathers happiness. It's not uncommon for people who have bene happy in marriage to want that again, and no one can control when or where they meet the one to move on with. Linda died..Paul didn't.
His relationship with Heather Mills started in 1999, only a scant year after Linda, his beloved wife of 29 years, died. That is too soon. Just ask all his kids.
LA | Homepage | 06.05.06 - 12:19 pm | #
Maybe he was sad about her passing, but he wanted to find somebody new. Who knows if he was totally ga-ga over Linda.
Dang, I can't believe this shit didn't come out sooner.
Her nipples are really huge.
"Suspicious timing, isn't it?"
You know?! Isn't it strange how these pictures surfaced as they are about to get divorced.
My mum and I discussed his childrens reaction when he got married and we both agreed they were being very selfish. Their concern should have been their fathers happiness. It's not uncommon for people who have bene happy in marriage to want that again, and no one can control when or where they meet the one to move on with. Linda died..Paul didn't.
Anonymous | 06.05.06 - 12:24 pm | #
And who says his children wouldn't have LOVED it if he had remarried someone who wasn't a money-grubbing, slut? Perhaps his children weren't being selfish at all. Perhaps they were concerned about the character of the woman their father was involved with and the fact that Paul, blind from his grief or whatever, was unable to see the truth about Heather Mills. There's lots of legitimate information about her to support the question of her character, including the fact that he's divorcing her now.
On E! Online, her biography says that she tried to get regular modeling gigs back in the 80's but being a 32E made it difficult!
http://www.eonline.com/Holly/Sho...ws/Mills/Facts/
I'll tell ya why people hate on her... she is a big skank ho phony! Her first husband divorced her when he found out she was fucking a Slovenian ski instructor. Just because she's missing part of one leg doesn't suddenly make her a saint. And she was jaywalking when she got hit by the motorcycle in the first place.
Yeah, she's gonna hold her own against a Beatle. Uh huh. Yeah. Um, Mills? You listening? YOKO is still being burned in effigy daily, and all SHE did was love the guy.
Mills is incredibly ugly, too. I mean, no one ever says that, but like, she's fugly.
LA, calm down!!! You seem to be very pissed off about your beloved Paul marrying Heather! Are you jealous of her?
I, for one, like Heather Mills and think she has done more to help other people than probably you and I will ever do. Paul met Heather when she was being honored for a prestigious award for her humanitarian work. You and I will never be honored for this. She risked her life in war torn countries before she even met Paul.
Read her profile: http://www.eonline.com/Holly/Sho...ws/Mills/Facts/
Of course she has skeletons in her closet. We all do (except maybe you of course). Have you ever thought that maybe she dumped her fiance because he was a bum or not good for her? I've done the same thing in my life in order to have a better life with someone decent.
I know that some form of animal crueilty was involved in that video shoot.
Yeah, Lee Eastman had nothing to do with Eastman Kodak, and neither did Linda. But um, no one cares about the actual truth of the matter. They just like the myth. Shhhh.
There's some haters/losers on this board!!!
And who says his children wouldn't have LOVED it if he had remarried someone who wasn't a money-grubbing, slut? Perhaps his children weren't being selfish at all. Perhaps they were concerned about the character of the woman their father was involved with and the fact that Paul, blind from his grief or whatever, was unable to see the truth about Heather Mills. There's lots of legitimate information about her to support the question of her character, including the fact that he's divorcing her now.
LA | Homepage | 06.05.06 - 12:33 pm | #
A money grubbing slut? That's nice, considering she wanted to sign a prenup and he REFUSED. Paul isn't an idiot and he certainly isn't simple. They dated for 4 years before getting married. He was hardly "blinded by grief" when he said "I Do". And no one knows the inner workings of their relationship but them. I certainly don't think Star Magazine or the Sun know what went on. And I doubt you have any insider information.
I think that fugly Stella McCartney is hanging around this site and posting. She hangs around Kate Moss. That should say enough. Of course she's not going to like someone coming in and taking her inheritance! LMAO
Especially someone prettier than her fugly face!
Mimi, it wasn't just any award:
In February 1998, she was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize for her assistance in war-torn areas.
Also:
In May 1999, Mills and Paul McCartney were presenters at an event honoring the animal-rights work of McCartney's late wife, Linda. Mills flew off to Cambodia to film a documentary about victims of land mines and promptly fell in love with a man there. Ten days later, they were engaged. Two months later, they broke it off.
So, it wasn't where Paul and Mills hooked up immediately, And, yeah, I would break up with a guy I became engaged to in 10 days also!!
It's not like she's in a porno. Big deal.
It's not like she's in a porno. Big deal.
Al | 06.05.06 - 1:01 pm | #
Did you even read the article?
"One shot shows Heather naked and smothered in baby oil as she performs a sex act on a nude male porn star. The curly-haired man is then photographed performing an act on her with the help of a sex toy."
IT WAS IN 1988!!! WHO CARES!!!
I THINK SHE REDEEMED HERSELF SINCE THEN!!
ALSO, I'M SURE EVERY WOMAN ON THIS SITE HAS GIVEN A BLOW JOB OR USED A SEX TOY WITH A MAN OTHER THAN HER HUSBAND/BOYFRIEND. AT LEAST HEATHER WAS BEING PAID FOR IT, UNLIKE THE UNPAID WHORES HERE ON DLISTED!!
pssst - nobody panic - that's what REAL tits look like! I know! It's terrifying not to see them under a womans chin and perfectly round! Don't be afraid!
thats' true, but good lord, she has huge aeriola's.
ALSO, I'M SURE EVERY WOMAN ON THIS SITE HAS GIVEN A BLOW JOB OR USED A SEX TOY WITH A MAN OTHER THAN HER HUSBAND/BOYFRIEND. AT LEAST HEATHER WAS BEING PAID FOR IT, UNLIKE THE UNPAID WHORES HERE ON DLISTED!!
ANON | 06.05.06 - 1:19 pm | #
LMAO Thinking back on it, I wish I was paid!! It soooo wasn't worth it!
I'm digging the guy's feathery mullet.
No wonder they love David Hasselhoff in Germany.
"LADY Heather McCartney posed in depraved pornographic clinches which are bound to sicken her estranged husband Sir Paul and his army of fans."
well, thats overkill. they didnt look that bad to me. would be hot if it werent for the distracting 80's hairstyles, and because the fact that these images make me have to think of Paul having sex by association. gag
These pics are old news. Everyone in England knows that Heather is an ex glamour model. The tabloids have smelt blood on this one and they are going in for the kill. Before McCartney, Heather did have a bit of a reputation and was a tabloid darling for her willingness to tell all about her relationships. That all changed when Heather met Paul and she was seen to have become a bit grand and aloof. The tabloids have been waiting to tear her to pieces ever since the confetti was swept away.
I think Paul was incredibly lonely and got in over his head. I think Heather was very flattered by the attention and given her past, her intentions were probably not entirely honourable.
I feel really sorry for Paul, but I don't feel the need to slag off Heather. I just think it is a sad, sorry mess.
I agree Scorpio, it's just sad that they have a young daughter together. Really, what 60-year-old needs to be a parent? Paul should've gotten the ol' snip if he wanted to bang younger women. Now little what's-her-name (Beatrice?)is going to suffer because of this mess.
Geordie my arse, she's not from Newcastle!
That's my two cents.
Where did she model? Was it here in the US, to be honest I'd never heard of her until she got with Paul
you can get paid for giving a blowjob?
That was a long time ago. And I heard that McCartney already knew that she was a soft core porno bitch before he married her. IF she does it now, it would be really gross--fucking herself with her own leg....UGH!
What Heather is doing in those pics is pretty mild compared to what Paris Hilton, Lindsay Lohan, and Nicole Ritchie do on a daily basis.
I take these "porno" pics with a grain of salt because no one does cheesy things like that unless they're desperate for cash. Looking at her past and the fact that she was 21 at the time, it's more than likely that she needed the money. I read her book and her younger siblings have said that Mills pretty much took on caring for them.
you can get paid for giving a blowjob?
nippy bits | 06.05.06 - 2:38 pm | #
What planet are you from? Of course you can. That's what most prostitutes do for money.
Not that I know this for a fact or anything! LOL
she is too young to have those saggy titties.
I posted this before but it's worth repeating that she once was a 32E. (I didn't think that was possible!) She had to get them reduced because they were too big.
Whatever the outcome,there were SO many red flags about this woman before he married her.
Too bad she will be a rich woman with a title now after 4 years of marriage AND the UK will hate her,she will have to move!
Listen, I'm not going to judge this woman but holy hell she has the nastiest boobs I've ever seen
Oh my. I'm shocked.
Her breasts look great. Let's not a little reality not creep into our minds.
Yeah, like Paul was a total angel when he was younger.
Gross. They look like gourds.
Now, someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure prenups aren't really worth the paper they're written on in the UK. I don't believe that they have much legal clout over here.
4Queen&Country | 06.05.06 - 12:22 pm | #
They are far less useful than in the US. For one thing, the courts have generally refused to honour them if the terms are too one-sided; for another, they aren't generally enforced after the birth of the first child of the marriage or after a certain amount of time (differs in England, Scotland, etc.). The best way to void a prenup is to get yourself knocked up - or to knock up your wife.
Since they have a baby, the entire debate over whether they had a prenup is irrelevant with respect to Sir Paul's British wealth. (He owns property in the US and I think Germany, so there are some legal questions there.)
Yeah, like Paul was a total angel when he was younger.
anon | 06.05.06 - 5:21 pm | #
Isn't that the case! I bet he knew all about this and didn't give a damn.
However, I think there are going to be allegations coming out in the next few weeks of things that happened during their marriage which will be much more damning of Lady Macca than something she did to pay the bills 18 years ago.
Maybe next time he will marry someone closer to his own age.
She is about to become one RICH *itch!
Bitch needs a waistline.
Meh, figured it wasn't going to last, but what's the controversy over these pics. A lot beautiful yet barely talented women who try to be famous wind up doing pictures like these.
As for her breasts, there's not that bad, that's what REAL large breasts look like. I'd rather see that than Jordan's flotation devices.
How is it that these pictures have never surfaced before? Did Paul purchase them when they were dating? Is he leaking them now? I hope this does not turn into an acrimonious divorce. He doesn't deserve that legacy.
I wouldn't expect any less from a self righteous twat.
Wow I think she looks older in those pics than she does now. I never knew how she lost her leg. When she wears short skirts, you can hardly tell poor thing.
When will people learn this shit always comes back to haunt you. Surely this types of things don't pay that much. Is it really worth it?
Jessucka | 06.05.06 - 11:53 am | #
When you haven't much in the two or three weeks and the rent is do and the power and phone was cut last week and it's freezing cold inside your apartment...you aren't thinking too much about whats going to happen to you eighteens into the future. That filthy, mean, and nasty British press was put up to this by McCartney's people. Funny - this never came out before, even with all the excitement when she first started dating Sir Piece of Shit McCartney.
Why John? Why couldn't it have been Paul!
Two many keystroke errors...I'm too pissed off.
When will people learn this shit always comes back to haunt you. Surely this types of things don't pay that much. Is it really worth it?
Jessucka | 06.05.06 - 11:53 am | #
When you haven't eaten much in the last two or three weeks and the rent is do and the power and phone was cut off last week and it's freezing cold inside your apartment...you aren't thinking too much about what's going to happen to you eighteens into the future. That filthy, mean, and nasty British press was put up to this by McCartney's people. Funny - this never came out before, even with all the excitement when she first started dating Sir Piece of Shit McCartney.
Why John? Why couldn't it have been Paul!
WTF about her breasts? If they were fake people would give her shit about that. Here's a wild thought....real tits sag!
I don't like the timing of it either. There is something really sick about the media always trying to dredge-up something about a celebrity's past in order to degrade them.
Take it from someone who has worked on that blue side of motion picture making and print media. The finished product conjures up ideas in your mind and therefore makes you assign all those emotions and feelings that you want to feel and experience. When creating these images the process is very mechanical and controled. She probably made to take any one of those pictures a couple dozen times.
Now --- a Girls Gone Wild video is something completely different.
oh god i just laughed my ass off at all the beatles song title puns with the pictures. that was too damn much!
Question for any straight men in the audience: do you find this woman at all attractive? Or was she like a minor celeb in Britain who did a naughty book for kicks/ free publicity?
Even if I was het, I would pass this one up. She's plain and has ugly tits.
another greedy no hoper,not suprising
the marriage broke up.The Brits are going to annhilate this 1 & a 1/2 legged whore & she'll deserve every bit of shit that flies her way.At least Paul's been gracious about it all unlike his cunting soon to be ex
1 & a 1/2 legged,thin lipped,big mouthed typically fake blonde headed
wife.
shes a fucken cunt.
yoko #2
CORRECTION: Linda Eastman is NOT affiliated with George Eastman or Kodak. It is coincidence that she was a photographer.
Paul has $300 million because..well...he's PAUL MCCARTNEY.
See what Cindyloo wrote too.
Get your facts straight, god dammit.
Lol. She's gonna be fucked up.
Hey.... LOL....
Scorpio Minx Sharper | 06.05.06 - 2:25 pm | #
I agree with you 100%. Neither Paul nor Heather are completely to blame, but they aren't helpless victims, either. They're both adults that went into the marriage knowing that the other had a lot of baggage coming along for the ride.
I think our emotions concerning this situation would be better served in hoping that this divorce doesn't adversely affect their young daughter.
Serves Macca right for writng the song"Give Ireland back to the Irish",Slap it up ye Scouse twat.F.G.A.U
Dirty peg leg slut!!!!!Pooor Macca gave her a plane for her birtday.......he gave her a Ladyshave for her other leg,hahaha.Slap it up ye Macca,you no talent Scouse/Irish TWAT!!!!!
well you can call her a porn star, slut, golddigger or anything you want , but she'll be realy pissed to learn that people are calling her a 'Geordie', thats just below the belt.
I never liked her. Paulie shouldn't have married her in the first place. But I'm sure he was awfully horny, she was pretty, and he probably dreamed that it'd be a marriage just like his and Linda's. How about a little sympathy for Paulie, since his dream has disappeared? I am a die-hard Beatles fan and have loved Paulie since 1963. So now all the Beatles have/had a divorce. I wish him luck in the future. As for the slutty, little money and fame monger, I wish her the very worst.
Pretty pathetic calling her a slut and making comments on her breasts. I feel sorry for you who talks about women as sluts and at the same time jerks of to other similar pics.
If a guy would have done the same thing - he would probably be a hero for you.
you are all fags, slut slut slut slut slut slut slut slut.
So what? This isn't even new news...
When she lost her leg, the sun posted these pics... when she did her interview, it was revealed that she was an escort... next thing you know, the sun is going to report she lost her leg in an accident.
So who cares? 20 year old pictures and all Paul had to have known. She's just hated now cus of her association to Paul, how dare she tarnish his reputation. The media needs to get a life.
where can the porn videos be found?
some link.
Damn, it's like ya can't even make cheesy porn anymore without someone getting in your shit about it 20 years later!
Gosh, She even Loks like 80's prn Queen Ginger Lynn in these pics!haha!
I can't understand why Paul didn't see her for what she really was. It is a great disappointment for Paul, as he clearly had a really great marriage with Linda and maybe thought it could happen again.
In the event Heather has proved a mere two-bit slut. Amputee or not, Landmine campaigner or not, she lacks style and integrity ... is no 'Lady' for sure.
Paul married a "money slut" and everyone knew it except him. Heather slowly climbed the later (with or without clothes?) up to the top of the money tree. Each guy was richer and richer. Jackpot for poor old Paul. Pathetic rich old guy was desperate to believe in her. Maybe he should have had a prenup and married someone that really did care about him. Maybe someone just a little closer to his age. He looks like an old fool. Heather is no fool. She knew what she wanted and went for it with no trouble. Oh, well another one bits the dust!
So what, if he is using this as a reason for divorce he is a shallow person.
Some of your personal comments about Heather Mills is absolutely appalling. I hope that YOU dont lose a leg and have people ridicule you for it! And as for her physical appearance, people get old..it comes to us all...what goes around comes around! ....sick and sad idiots is what you are
good site
http://www.healthcare.net.in/
manoj kumar
good site
.accomhttp://wwwodationsmotels.org/
good site
http://www.bestjewellerybox.org/
msnoj kumar
good site
http://www.bitautoparts.org/
manoj kumar
good site
good site
http://www.childplanet.us/
Commenting by HaloScan
