Why would they call the baby a runt? That's wierd.
The kid is going to be a nutcase
Third??
not yo' bebe. if it's a real bebe at all.
Photoshop on a baby...how lovely. Natural-looking photos a la the Jolie-Pitts may have looked a tad more presentable.
How is it a runt if it was only 1 week premature?
Poor child, since apparently the Suri-Squatch is real, she actually has to grow up with those people.
How much did TC get for the pictures?
And is the money going to CO$?
That's sad that people expect a baby to look perfect. What kind of world do we live in where a baby has to be photoshopped to be presentable to the world?
I'm wondering if Cruise and Holmes dont want the public to see their baby because it's not "perfect".
a bit of a runt? hahahaha.. that's why tom cruise doesn't want the public to see. god he's pathetic.
The baby MUST have something wrong with it if a FIVE MONTH OLD is being described as a runt. Little tiny newborns, yes -- babies almost half a year old, no.
Either that, or the cult didn't didn't get a kid the right age.
I (sort-of) understand taking numerous photos to get a *perfect* shot... but why Photoshop a baby?
Is she....:
a) Nothing like Tom so they Photoshopped one of his baby pics on her face.
b) Hideously deformed by some medical condition that took *all that time* to disguise?! Or just plain funny-looking.
c) Not there at all and she's just a photo composite of Tom and Katie as babies.
I'm hoping all the reshoots and touchups were for the PARENTS. This is all sad and weird.
katie & tom are all about image
all image, no substance. i hope this kid gives them hell.
Hopefully it was Katie and Tom that needed the retouching and not the baby.
Give me a break! Photoshopping a baby??!! I actually have some respect for Britney for showing SPF, flaws and all.
I wonder how much they got paid for these pics?
For a couple all about image, I'm sure they're shallow enough to keep the baby hidden because it's not that cute.
How the fuck did it end up a runt? Wasn't Katie pregnant with it for about three years?
Everyone is being so nice and commenting on valid subjects like how society expects perfection and stuff, so I guess I'll be the first to be tasteless and say that it probably took three days to photo shop the scales off.
If they are feeding that kid that stupid barely formuala rather than breast milk or formula it wouldn't suprise me if she was a little malnourished looking.
Ted C wrote that an insider was saying that Tom Cruise told friends she was a well behaved baby but that she spits up a lot.
so I guess I'll be the first to be tasteless and say that it probably took three days to photo shop the scales off.
Cammie | 08.18.06 - 8:15 pm | #
So when is this Vanity Fair issue gonna be released?
Did they mean 21 days of Earth time, or space time?
No one buy that freakin magazine all the money is going to that freak church of his.
I do not understand either how it could be a runt. Katie was huge during the last few months..Or at least the pillow was huge.
If Suri exists, she must be one homely baby- I'm talking Tori Spelling homely.
Tom says she's a "well behaved baby" ??? WTF?? You mean she says please and thank you and doesn't interrupt?
aww i luv that lil mouse or w/e it is..i want one.
SPF, Shiloh, Kingston, Moses, Bluebell, August, Henry, we saw these babies, days after they were born. We all saw pictures of newborn BABIES! WTF is going on with Suri? This is really getting scary........
GO YANKEES 
Maybe the baby is hideous looking and that's why they've chosen to keep her hidden from the public!
well, the gerbil in the pic is cute!
A bit of a runt? WTF?
The gerbil is adorable. Awww, they're so cute when they sleep in your hand. Those little paws are just like hands.
And I agree that it's kind of weird to say a baby is well-behaved.
It's especially weird to photoshop a baby at their peak cuteness months. In the first few months, I could understand a little photoshopping -- the skin redness, that matted hair during the first week. But now? It's probably just one of those lame composite photos, pasted onto a different baby's body.
how do begin to photoshop a newborn unless something is wrong with this baby...
the baby is totally fug and we all know it.
OMG WTF? effing freaks these 2 are, to have the gull of photoshopping the baby's pic!!!, they f*cking suck, I feel sorry for that child.
they have to photoshop the baby. we keep hearing how beautiful she is so if that kid comes out looking average or even less than they'll never hear the end of it.
WORD. bitch had that beast in her forever. "premature", possibly...we aren't sure of the normal gestation of a freaking extra-terrestrial/humanoid hybrid.
The kid was supposedly born 7 lbs -- puzzled by the runt comment. Must be that barley formula.
99% of newborns are expected to be ugly. They should just have released the photos early so she had nowhere to go but up. Don't they know the pressure and analysis will be much worse now? What fuckin neurotic nutjobs.
No one buy that freakin magazine all the money is going to that freak church of his.
boycott | 08.18.06 - 8:23 pm | #
--------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
I AM GAME!!
of course the baby's a runt!!! look at her daddy, tom "don't wear heels in public when we're together" cruise. kid's gonna be a raven haired, laser beam eyed hyper active loony tune. i shall call her "yob."
oops, she's a she. Then i shall call her "lirg."
MK you are tooo hilarious.
hahaha lmao you guys are funny! So true everyone! So true!
The kid is deformed because of the birth defect inducing vitamin regimen that new scientologists must undergo. They probably had to photoshop out the 3rd lip.
No one buy that freakin magazine all the money is going to that freak church of his.
boycott | 08.18.06 - 8:23 pm | #
I'll second that. When he starts sending money to African orphans or Brazilian lepers or something, I'll buy. Money to buy another e-meter for the Cruiser? I think not.
I'm just curious. Why VANITY FAIR? They don't strike me as the kind of magazine, that would have a baby on the cover. Look at their track record........
GO YANKEES
i so fucking hate rats!
Maybe she was very premature and this is where the rumors that Katie gave birth in December come in?
No one buy that freakin magazine all the money is going to that freak church of his.
boycott | 08.18.06 - 8:23 pm | #
MK will have the pics before Vanity Fair publishes, anyway 
That's why all children should be adopted. That way, you can weed out the ugly ones, and not lose your figure, only to suffer for eighteen years, with an ungrateful brat who doesn't appreciate the nice things I give her!
Maybe she was very premature and this is where the rumors that Katie gave birth in December come in?
little gloria | 08.18.06 - 10:38 pm | #
She was a 7 pound baby.
Joan Crawford | 08.18.06 - 10:39 pm |
And no wire hangers, DAMN IT!
GO YANKEES
they had to use photoshop so they could make her look like the 2 of them. LOL
I couldn't agree more mommy.
I bet VF only shot for maybe a day or possibly two, but Tom is such a maniac he demanded they shoot for 21 days. He probably stood 2 inches from the touch-up guy's ear screaming, "NO! SHE DOESN'T LOOK LIKE ME! CHANGE IT YOU CUNT! NO! THAT DOESN'T WORK! YOU SUCK! L RON IS GOING TO BE SO MAD!!! CHANGE IT AGAIN!"
little gloria, premature babies are only born after eleven months on soap operas.
I refuse to contribute to anything that might go to that little twerp and that cult.
Do I have to explain everything? The rumors are she gave brth last dec & faked the last part of her pregnancy-- if suri was born 3-4 months premmie she could still look odd & runtish now.
hahahahaha @ mommy dearest!
I'm down with little Gloria's theory, makes sense to me... and I am so not buying anything that has to do with TC, I boycott it all! None of my money's going to those alien lovin'nutjobs.
if suri is just a normal baby it's a shame tom chose to turn this whole thing into a circus. now instead of people wanting to look at her pics to see if she's cute, people are wanting to look at her pics just to see if she has two heads!
Don't know about Suri, but that little gerbil (?) or whatever is adorable!
Poor thing. Who knows, the baby is probably fine but because of all the hype they had to photoshop in a glowing halo around her head and minimize any perceived flaws.
Little Gloria.. I understand your theory. Tom is just screwy enough to think hiding a premature baby was a good idea! But even if Suri does exsist and it's actually Tom's baby..would we expect anything BUT a runt?
One week is not premature. Estimating the birth date is at best a calculated guess. Both of my babies were supposedly born 1 week after the due date, but personally I felt that they were right on time at 7 pound and 7 pound 11.
Most new born are small and generally lose weight after birth sometimes dramatically, due to them getting used to the different way of feeding and the mother getting used to the breast feeding. The milk is also very thin at first which would also account for the loss in body weight.
So I am more inclined to think the theory of her giving birth in December may hold some weight or they had the real mother induced a little too early to coincide with his movie premier...hence the runt comment. The conspiracies are really endless. Personally I feel we should definitely not buy the magazine or support this freak show any more. There I have had my say.
whenever Suri was born or whoever her father is y'all are right it's not so funny anymore knowing that a helpless baby is at the mercy of this sick fuck & his cult.
Strange how he never let his other two children be in the eye of the media....what makes her so different?
I think Tom's publicist did a good job with creating intrigue around this baby that otherwise would've been lost in the slew of babies born to celebrity parents around the same time. At that time, people were more intrigued with Brad and Angelina's baby.
So, this issue of Vanity Fair is going to be huge because everyone's curiousity is peaked. So, I'm sure the pic has to be just perfect.
Do I have to explain everything? The rumors are she gave brth last dec & faked the last part of her pregnancy-- if suri was born 3-4 months premmie she could still look odd & runtish now.
little gloria | 08.18.06 - 11:30 pm | #
3-4 months premature? You saw the photos of Katie in October, right? Bitch was at least 5 months along then. Unless you believe her belly button popped at 3 months?
Uhm, MK? You been highjacked? This is what I see at Dlisted.com
---------
Are you looking for Dlisted? It is temporarily out of service. Please try again in a few minutes. Meanwhile, discover a better blogging tool.
------------
The "better blogging tool" is linked to wordpress.com
I saw this one on ONTD arleady.
I bet Suri is a beautiful baby. But not as beautiful as Shiloh Jolie-Pitt.
A Runt? WTF? Is she a puppy? A Kitten?
And had to photoshop a baby?? Sheesh!! That is going to be one fucked up kid.
How can a baby be born 3 months premature and not be in the hospital ...monitered 24/7 by Doctors and nurses?
Sorry,There would be no way TC would handle a preemie at home and not in the Hospital.
Nice try...but doesnt work out.
suri wasn't born premature.. wasn't she pregnant for like 9 months?? and her belly was HUUUUUUGE
The preemie thing would explain a lot about the runtish report.
Except Suri, if she exists, was definitely not a preemie. When the pregnancy was announced, Katie was at least five months along -- she had the big belly and popped out navel, and no woman who's only two or three months along with her first child looks like that. Maybe if she's spawning quadruplets.
And given when they very pubicly got together and let us know when it happened (during Katie's "lost week"), it's quite obvious that date of conception was before they did anything.
Tom's little ploy could not have been more obvious -- Katie suddenly lost all her fluid weight in her last trimester, which does not happen in real life. She just happened to have an eleven-month pregnancy. And the due date just happened to coincide with MI:3's release.
The most unbelievable thing is that there are people who insist that it's all perfectly normal, and only wackos could believe that the Cruiser is doing something funky. This man genuinely believes with all of his little bipolar heart that he is a special, godlike person, and he's trying to convince the entire world of it. What's a few lies?
And yet he's not bright enough to try the Victorian ploy of a seven-month baby. Instead, he tries to convince us that a normal pregnancy produces a giant belly at two-three months.
If she exists, then Suri probably has some kind of disease that the egotist Cruiser doesn't want the world to know she has. Or perhaps the rental baby was too young.
if they're saying it's a runt, then it obviously wasn't that "baby" in the pic taken from a helicopter....cuz that one looked the size of a toddler...
I really think Tom's publicist might not really, you know, like him
I am with Maddi I am boycotting TomKat because it's too sick. Starting after this comment.
imapepper - WORD!
When VF comes out everyone bring a sharpie to your local newsstand, hide in a corner and draw the real Suri over the pics. Then leave the mag there for the idiot who purchases it.
Toilet Water -- if Tom had an ultrasound machine at home, he could have a whole damn NICU too.
If they did have a 21 day shoot, how come NO ONE saw Suri coming or going?
I don't believe that so called leak info.
Wow that is so weird. My son was almost 18 pounds at that age, no one in his right mind could call that a runt. We are not talking about a newborn after all. Babies that age can turn around on their own, hold their heads up, they are not that tiny any more!
And 21 days??? How many times can you take a baby's picture in 21 days??? Like a million times. There should be like ONE photo among them that doesn't take three additional days of photoshopping ... come to think of it, in three days I could photoshop a picture of my cat into a perfect baby ... and I'm not even a pro.
You know, this whole thing makes me thing of "Wag the Dog". For those of you who don't know, it is a movie about two producers who fake a war in order to draw attention away from the president's illicitous affair.
Sinking careers +baby scandal and controversy= new media attention
This baby may be theirs or someone elses, the point is Tom and Katie are very shrewd. They (or their publicists) have been manipulating this whole thing from the begining of their relationship.
...Does the dog wag the tail, or the tail wag the dog?
I don't even give a shit about this chatty kathy doll, I mean, baby Suri
Personally, I think Suri would be better in "Ben Hur"
I think it's got something wrong with it because remember they did buy that ultrasound machine for home use and the office staff did show them how to use it properly...omg that poor kid.
o.k., there has to be some BIG story attached to this coming out of Suri. Think about it.. the only way ANYONE gets on the cover of vanity fair is if they were molested by their uncle or some other travesty we never heard of until they need press. They will announce something about her. Probably right before Tom's next movie comes out. Watch.
you can bet on whether suri exists or not on bodog.com, the gambling site
no i am not kidding
*sighs* Picky picky picky people! and I mean the parents, and for the millionth time, there is no baby. Even my dad knows this and he doesn't pay nearly as much attention as i do to the celeb world (no one does actualy) Too much evidence behind the no baby theory. Tom, Katie, you waited too long, now lets have somethin' else to talk about like the weddin' (assumin' we'll get one that is) so i can gush about the wedding dress and find ideas for my own here (yes, i am that helpless in plannin' my own weddin', i have no idea what the hell i'm doin')
You mean the baby looks enough like Cruise/Holmes now it's had 21 days of Photoshopping touch-ups and neutered down lighting shone all over it to be plausible.
Yawn. Next Tom, next. Hit us with the next one...
They have obviously Photoshopped a melon into existence.
aww that little mouse(?) baby is adorable
suri doesn't exist. you guys crack me up. keep it up mk, you rock!
I agree, "runt" is a strange word to describe a baby. If this photoshop/excessive shooting story is true, it is truly, truly sad. Way to start things off on the wrong foot, Tom! Thanks to Tom's asshole attitude, this kid will be in rehab by the time she's 3.
Man, if they have to do 21 days of shooting, plus photoshop your ass for days when you are five months old to get you presentable, you got a ROUGH life ahead.
When you're five months old, you've got the best skin you're ever going to have. You have no sun damage yet, you haven't smoked a pack a day for ten years, your diet is fucking pristine. Wrinkles are so far in the future as to be laughable.
So I'm trying like hell to figure out what in the WORLD you'd have to photoshop off or on to a five month old. They have clear, bright eyes at that age. They're smiling at that age. Skin like buttah. I mean, WTF?
As for the Vanity Fair issue, PREDICTION: at the last minute, Cruise or someone will announce that they decided to pull the pics because of "security fears" and are re-thinking how to introduce "Suri" to the world some other way.
Mark my words.
Commenting by HaloScan
