"The museum never intended to offend people, art should be allowed to provoke a debate."
Bull.
Shit.
Exactly what "debate" did they intend to provoke?
This was about instant publicity, money and mocking Catholicism. I'm still waiting for someone to pull this stunt on Mohammed (pbuh).
Mark--at the beginning of the article we get this: "Austrian media has dubbed Vienna's version of the Muhammad caricature row".
Not quite the same is it? You know what I mean?
Alfred Hrdlicka. If that's him pictured, the initials are sure appropriate! Looks just like the Late Great, although a little older, a bit more portly, less majestic, but still, a shithead.
"Austrian media has dubbed Vienna's version of the Muhammad caricature row."
Oh, of course. Because peaceful protest is the same as destroying property, injuring people, threatening the lives of the "perpetrators," etc.
I think journalists share a mild form of logical retardation.
Commenting by HaloScan
