The frickin' political media -- which has been more celebrity-obsessed this past election cycle than at any time I can recall -- just can't cope with the fact that they're going to have to start writing headlines without the word "Clinton" in them for at least a few months after Labor Day, so we get more questionably relevant examples of this kind of dubious journalism.
Considering that they've always been the biggest proponents of the idea that "Clinton fatigue" would sink the party and that journalists are tired of covering the "Clinton psychodrama" and the "Clinton ego" and the "Clinton sense of entitlement", it almost leads one to suspect that Maureen Dowd can't be believed when she claims to be *so over* the Clintons.
Did anybody get a look at her body language when she wrote her latest carping-about-the-convention column?
I nearly through my TV through the window yesterday when they spent five minutes discussing the footage of Clinton handlers holding up suit jackets to see which looked best against the background. Heeee! Pantsuits!
I had to turn off the ridiculous body language expert. The news has covered everything but what she actually said which was a fantastic Democratic speech.
Commenting by HaloScan
