Frankenstein is the doctor who created the creature. It is inaccurate to refer to the monster itself as Frankenstein.
Jason Latshaw | Homepage | 10.31.05 - 2:38 pm | #

Most of the drivel here is inaccurate.
Jamille | Homepage | 10.31.05 - 3:46 pm | #

I like your blog, Jamille. Do I have to purchase a ringtone?
Mike M. | Homepage | 10.31.05 - 4:29 pm | #

Most of the drivel here is inaccurate.

No it isn't, just go sell your ringtones dude. Geez...
mynym | Homepage | 10.31.05 - 4:50 pm | #

Geez is a shortened form of "Jesus," using it is akin to taking the Lord's name in vain.
Jason Latshaw | Homepage | 10.31.05 - 5:39 pm | #

First:

Main Entry: Fran·ken·stein
Pronunciation: 'fra[ng]-k&n-"stIn also -"stEn
Function: noun
1 a : the title character in Mary W. Shelley's novel Frankenstein who creates a monster by which he is eventually killed b : a monster in the shape of a man especially in popularized versions of the Frankenstein story
2 : a monstrous creation; especially : a work or agency that ruins its originator(Emphasis added)

I ain't sure 'bout that 'innacurate drivel,' but I dang sure knows about 'inane dribble."

Carl
Carl | Homepage | 10.31.05 - 10:10 pm | #

buy the ringtone!
Jason Latshaw | Homepage | 11.01.05 - 12:55 am | #

Franklin was an atheist, you dolt. Ask any historian.

And just because I peddle Ringtones doesn't make me an idiot.

Mynym, on the other hand, is a faith-blinded pseudo-intellectual. A pretty scary one at that.

And Latshaw, for the record, I like you man. The voice of reason etc. I just don't know why you waste your time on the likes of Eminem here.
Jamille | Homepage | 11.02.05 - 11:05 am | #

"A pretty scary one at that."

I didn't see that before. It all kind of blurs together into, "Blah, blah, blah, I believe this charlatan, but you, why! Yada, yada...."

But I see that you are scared. Quite frightened?

Boo!

Maybe you felt a little fright about that too? Hmmm, I heard that ignorance is supposed to be bliss, but perhaps it is rather scary instead.
mynym | Homepage | 11.04.05 - 3:56 pm | #

"It is an empirical fact that living matter behaves very differently from nonliving matter."???

Surely this is not a modern quote. It looks more like medieval thinking, not even up to Renaissance standards. Rocks fail to heal when broken, not because they are a different kind of matter, but because they have no vascular system as bones do, and no cellular repair apparatus, as bones do.

So-called living matter is made of so-called non-living matter. Aside from faulty human categorizations, there is no difference between the two.
Dale | 11.07.05 - 1:34 pm | #