|
|
|
This post is a disgrace. There is nothing here but speculation and innuendo. Why didn't you post the story about the many real illegal financial practices of Kyle Loveless when he was Istook's campaign manager?
Thomas Paine |
07.30.07 - 10:10 am | #
|
|
We did
http://www.okpns.com/2007/05/fec...4-
campaign.html
Editor |
Homepage |
07.30.07 - 10:27 am | #
|
|
Illegal? For an action to be deemed illegal, one must be charged.
Mr. Loveless has not been charged with any illegal action. Y
Ironically, your remark, simply an implication, but not the truth.
Anonymous |
Homepage |
07.30.07 - 11:49 am | #
|
|
City employees taking up political yard signs in people's own yard... sounds fishy to me.
If someone came on my ranch to take my signs, I would get out my bow and they would have an arrow where the sun don't shine.
Foshee versus Loveless is going to be a barn burner.
Ted Nugent |
07.30.07 - 1:47 pm | #
|
|
I don't know if Foshee is liberal or not, he hired Black, who is pretty conservative.
However, he does hang around the unions of public employees alot, and he determined their salaries and such on the council.
I do agree that for a State Senate seat, you have two prominent people running, Foshee and Loveless and it is just only beginning to get crazy...
Rush Limbaugh |
07.30.07 - 4:13 pm | #
|
|
What ties does this site have which cuase it to constantly bash Foshee and run his name into the ground? It doesn't seem very balanced and, after the '06 election season in general,this site has lost all legitimacy and respect.
Norman Law Student |
07.30.07 - 9:11 pm | #
|
|
Wow, this is an absurd piece of reporting, obviously written-- or written with the aid of-- Kyle Loveless. Quote some sources, cite some evidence, or stop making baseless accusations. If Loveless wants to win this nomination, he shouldn't start the negative attacks this early. It's sad that he has to resort to them in the first place.
Sad, sad, sad.
Kyle Pathetico |
08.01.07 - 11:29 pm | #
|
|
Commenting by HaloScan
|