Tattoos are too permanent for my taste, and usually too trendy. Every third woman in hipster jeans is showing off the upper spikes of some biohazard-like design inked into the flesh just above her buttocks, and the random scattering of images on hands, arms, necks, and other more or less visible areas of the body displayed by the hard rock kids and grizzled veterans of the scene show no more than a (perhaps) lowered pain threshold than some others may have, rather than much sense of graphical design intersecting with human anatomy. If you're going to do it, I say go for the large canvas designs, something that makes use of the surface flesh with some daring.
Or get a couple more cats. Over the long term, you're less likely to suffer from disappointment with your choice.
My standard is anything more than two cats means you're crazy, increasing exponentially with each cat. So you (and Andrea) are still OK.
Okay, so I stand alone here, but I actually think 3 cats, 5 pets all up (meaning maybe 3 cats, 2 dogs) is still within the normal range. And I don't mind ppl having more so long as they look after them well. Two cats can be fun Bill, they chase each other around and it's hours of entertainment for the family. Except it's better if they're put together when young. How's old Lancaster taking it?
Keep in mind that I hate cats. But a friend of mine, an ex-cop said that cops had a saying about cats based on the police's experience entering the homes of people who have died alone with their pets:
"A dog will sit by you for months. He'll starve to death guarding your corpse. But with a cat, you're meat as soon as you hit the floor."
More than one cat means less for the relatvies to bury, so there's that.
ewww. ewww. that's just...eww. besides, lancaster probably wouldn't eat me, she's as devoted as any dog.
anook though...idk. mum'd better watch out for that one.
Hey!
Commenting by HaloScan
