A Revolution is the Solution
thats some Serious bandwidth burnage PG that story bounced around the world so many times lol nice to See Mozilla up there on the browser Stats, im one of those who uses Mozilla when im unsure about a site
And your adsense revenue?
The main thing is that Firefox accounts for 65% of slashdot audience. Since most of the traffic generated comes from slashdot, most of the traffic will be using firefox...
The main thing is that Firefox accounts for 65% of slashdot audience. Since most of the traffic generated came from slashdot, most of the traffic will be using firefox...
Share the adsense revenue over those 4 days? Around $80?
unless ur blog hosts major videos, it seems odd to me that the calculations don't add up. 16,000 uniques the first day and 3,000 gigs of bandwidth. That's a couple hundred megs per unique?
Nice writeup. Excellent to see a good quality analysis. That's some traffic!
Now, was it quality traffic? Did it convert into sales/leads/signups, etc...?
THAT is the million dollar question in such matters.
I think you got MB/GB mixed up there, 190MB per user seems a tad high bandwidth consumption
The Digg that where classified may be from digg mirror, digg gets mirrored to a group of server that help serv up the content. they are distributed archetecture so you go to one site and it redirects you to the mirror with the least band width.
No idea how those would be classified but they may be your other.
this is all just hearsay, it is what i was told..
Hm? You mean you don't use Mozilla when you're sure about a site? 
Very interesting compilation of data here! I saw Marc at Evolving Trends had a similar big hit like yours alluded to at the end, but he didn't have the same impressive array of visuals to match as you do... nor the trifecta for comparison. I think the real question here is, did you at least get a decent CTR from all that? Something has to cover bandwidth costs
Elhost - thanks, I had a feeling in the back of my brain there was an error in there somewhere. Doh. Corrected 
wow, i didnt even notice the gb - i just assumed it was mb anyway. i was more interested in the spread of traffic and how one merged into another. does this mean i get a cookie? :P
So which was the story?
Nice visuals, did your webstats package generate them? If so which package are you using?
It seems to me stories on the Digg front page have been changing faster recently, incidentally reducing the Digg effect.
Commenting by HaloScan
