|
|
|
This is just what I expect from him, God bless him. For the past few years he'd been trying to resign his Vatican posts and retire, but John Paul II wouldn't let him. He certainly never wanted to be Pope. Indeed, it would be a bad sign if he, or anyone, had such an ambition. Who would want such a burden? Only if the Lord wills it should a man agree to wear the Fisherman's Ring.
Jordanes Ceramistes |
04.25.05 - 6:54 pm | #
|
|
I sure as heckfire wouldn't want to be pope! Can you imagine the HUGE pressure?
jayson |
Homepage |
04.25.05 - 8:09 pm | #
|
|
I would never want to be pope. I want to be the guy with the pointy red bag on his head that stretches liberals on the rack and roasts Comic Book Guys like lovehandles over an open fire. Now THAT'S a vocation!!
ralph roister-doister |
04.27.05 - 2:39 pm | #
|
|
I love the smell of roasting heretics in the morning.
ralph roister-doister |
04.27.05 - 2:41 pm | #
|
|
And we've definitely been stretching that teller of tall tales "lovehandles" on our rack here, haven't we? He/she has provided us with hours of fun, so let us extend him/her our thanks for the entertainment.
Jared Olar |
04.27.05 - 5:54 pm | #
|
|
For the sake of anyone not familiar with "lovehandles" and what this person has done, you may read my comments here:
http://www.haloscan.com/comments...4914779/
#494478
Dr. Blosser has banned this individual from his weblog, but apparently he or she has switched to a different IP address or something.
Jared Olar |
04.27.05 - 5:59 pm | #
|
|
Wrong again Jared, I got a "banned" notice for a few hours, but then Dr. Blosser in his infinite wisdom decided to let me stay! Oh happy day! *VBG*
lovehandles |
04.28.05 - 3:47 am | #
|
|
Well, we all know you are a liar, so you might be lying about Dr. Blosser changing his mind. Dr. Blosser can let us know whether or not you've figured out how to tell the truth this time.
Jared Olar |
04.28.05 - 8:55 am | #
|
|
Give me one example of a lie I have told *S*
lovehandles |
04.28.05 - 10:26 am | #
|
|
Why list just one? Your very first comment here included a lie. You said the election of Pope Benedict XVI would cause African children to contract and die of AIDS, whereas you know it is violation of the Church's teachings on sexual conduct that spreads AIDS, not obedience to the Church's teachings.
"what I and many other liberal Catholics are smelling with this election are the rotting corpses of Africa's children who have been given a fresh death sentence with this conservative stitch-up.
lovehandles | 04.20.05 - 5:15 am"
Then there was that time you stated that the Church not only can but must violate Christ's teaching that reserves ordination to men.
I also seem to recall a time when you represented yourself to be someone's employer and put words in that employer's mouth that made it seem that a commentator here had received a public reprimand for participating here on company time.
Then there was that time you said a commentator here was advertising his status as employee of a certain business, when you knew you had no evidence of that accusation -- an accusation you repeated even when your falsehood was exposed.
There's also the times you've said a commentator here accused you of being a pedophile.
I might also point to your statement that one or more commentators here has "murderous thoughts about burning heretics."
Finally, and most seriously, you have several times called yourself a Catholic, even though you congratulate yourself on refusing to believe what the Catholic Church teaches.
Jared Olar |
04.28.05 - 12:50 pm | #
|
|
Tell you what, "lovehandles": how about you just post a formal apology for what you did on Sunday, and then I post an acceptance of your apology, and no longer remind the readers of this weblog of what you did.
Jared Olar |
04.28.05 - 1:10 pm | #
|
|
Commenting by HaloScan
|