|
|
|
>>What is the law when the highest court says P, ~P and "P is consistent with ~P"?
1. The final word on the subject, for now, for the reasons Humpty gave Alice; or
2. The SCC version of incremental change? or,
3. Making it easier for the Ontario Court of Appeal to say the SCC didn't change the prior law; or
4. More billable hours for litigators?; or
5. None of the above; or,
6. All of the above.
David Cheifetz |
06.12.07 - 3:11 pm | #
|
|
Commenting by HaloScan
|