Comments on this post - please leave your e-mail address
That's kind of funny.
I remember saying back in 99, who ever becomes President next year is gonna get blamed for the Dot.com crash.
Hehe. Now you are saying same for chairman. You are right though, Bush spends way too much. If the Reps want to hold my vote next Presidential election, they need to have a fiscal conservative nominated. Or if Hillary gets the nod from the Dems.
Try as I might, I can't see the US getting out of this dilemma. The only solutions are hard, painful solutions, and there appears to be zero polictical will to tackle the real issues.
A few more thoughts along similar lines here:
http://www.gilgamesh.ca/index.ph...merican-empire/
From what I can gather on the many sites that I visit, it appears that
60% of printed US dollars reside outside of the USA. Could Bernancke
solve the monstrous deficit by re-
pudiating all offshore US currency?
The concept is not unique seeing
that Nixon did it to DeGaulle re:
the French's attempt to exchange US
bucks for gold in '73.Or is all that
paper money miniscule compared to the
huge amount of T notes held by Japan and China? If the USA could screw DeGaulle, it would not be that outrageous for Bush to aggravate millions of individual US buck holders. It would be extremely diffi-
cult for a world of individual US
buck hoarders to mount a solid front
of resistance to such a revocation.
Commenting by HaloScan
