Cob Pile
She looks like 1)alice in wonderland for christs sake 2)Cover of an old Beatles
album 3) Tranny
Much better, PTG! Those losers at Time just can't help themselves--they even screwed up with "protest" pictures!
Nice job, PTG, in bringing out the real Ann again.
Interesting restoration, but I would suggest that you went a bit too far. Her legs actually are really, really skinny. Not as skinny as they showed her on the cover, but skinnier than your "restored" version.
I've got the magazine sitting right in front of me. Look at the pictures in the article, and you'll notice that she is noticeably more thin than the average woman -- you seem to have beefed her up to about average build.
Frankly, I'm not so sure what all the problem is -- I kinda thought the picture was cool. It was dramatic, sure, but not distinctly negative. (Yes, I'm conservative, though not a particular fan _or_ detractor of Ann.
Right you are, Strider. She really is a skinny one. I didn't spend but about 10 minutes on this image, and the main goal was to make the magazine look distorted instead of Ann. I guess I wanted her legs not to look painfully thin. Where I come from, emaciation isn't considered attractive or healthy.
Commenting by HaloScan
