document.write("

COMMENTS

$\"Gravatar\"$ Granted that there are races. Granted that natural selection favoured different evolutionary paths on different continents. Yet, I would like to hear your thoughts on the more important question of what do we do about it? Not in the sense of PC refutal or such non-sense, but in terms of how should this piece of science reflect on how we go about the business of life.

For example, you keep asserting that hispanics do not constitute a racial group. What then? Are they going to vote any differently? Are they going to stop thinking of themselves as culturally similar? Are you suggesting that no such thing as \"hispanic\" appears on college application forms? What would be the implications as to affirmative action?

Also, if Caucasians and Africans are both derived from different continental niches (neither of them north american), does this change anything about the founding ideas and attitudes regarding them in the US?

What about Europe and her relation with Russia or Turkey?

Great Blog!!
abu-al-alaa | 01.25.07 - 4:29 am | #

$\"Gravatar\"$ >For example, you keep asserting that hispanics do not constitute a racial group. What then?

So-called \"Hispanics\" can actually be of any racial background (Caucasian, Negroid, Amerindian, etc.) or \"mixed\" (Mestizo, Mulatto, Zambo, etc.) They are not a \"race\" per se.

>Are you suggesting that no such thing as \"hispanic\" appears on college application forms?

That's because of ignorance. Some people appear to be under the mistaken impression that \"Hispanics\" are all the same. Take a look at Sammy Sosa, George Lopez and Julie Gonzalo and tell me they are all the \"same\" race. LOL!
Anti-Morellian Front | 03.22.07 - 7:39 pm | #

$\"Gravatar\"$ What about people from the subcontinent. They are not Caucacian, Asian or African
avi | 03.25.07 - 10:50 pm | #

$\"Gravatar\"$ I miss your guestbook you goddamn motherfucker!
John | Homepage | 04.21.07 - 9:06 pm | #

$\"Gravatar\"$ Hi,
I have a question regarding this ancient skull from Yemen.
Is it a negroid or caucasoid type?

Thanks for a answer.

Picture link
http://img524.imageshack.us/img5.../5025/jhho1.jpg
Anonymous | 06.01.07 - 2:28 am | #

$\"Gravatar\"$ Your old foe \"Anon\" is still around
http://www.geocities.com/race_ar...cles/index.html

By the way he uses AOL.
oh | 06.04.07 - 5:35 am | #

$\"Gravatar\"$ *swig* yeah, what about the sub continent? and if all this turns out to be absolutly true then what? and if it turns out not to be true then what.
Dumbgirl | 01.25.08 - 6:27 pm | #

$\"Gravatar\"$ Of course they cluster along \"racial\" types!

But if they sampled every damn population in every country instead of sampling only populations who live far away from each other, they wouldn't get any clusters!
anonymous | 04.09.08 - 3:49 am | #

$\"Gravatar\"$ Hi,

First,
Jewish people are the most intelligent. They win almost 40% of the Nobel Prize's and they have a small population of only 14 million. So by far they exceed the other races in intelligence. The other races having huge numbers and such small contributions.

Second,
IQ tests, test intellectual conformity, not creativity and originality. This would explain the Asian high IQ's. They as a people are the ultimate conformists.

In IQ tests there is typically only one answer to the problem. That problem being a social conformity to reason. But everyone knows that Genius's and all of the greatest developments in the world are not the product of conformity. Conformity never breeds creativity. We can see this in the lack of influence the Asian population has had on Science. China used to be called the \"sick man\" of Asia. Their population is massive and their contribution to innovation is almost nil. We can see this lack of originality in their adoptation of European philosophies, I.e. Communism.

Friedrich Nietzsche and other Philosophers have critized Asians. Nietsche used the words \"Pallid osification\" to describe Orientals.

Pallid: lacking sparkle or liveliness.

Osification: The process of becoming set and inflexible in behavior, attitudes, and actions. Inflexible conformity, rigid unthinking acceptance of social conventions.

The reality is Asian people have yet to understand that laws and rules are arbitrary. Europeans make the rules and Asian's follow them.

It also doesn't make sense that Asian's are considered smart because of the fact that they have destroyed their own countries. This is due to over-population and their basic lack of enviromental understanding.

It is also common scientific fact that women who have many children are ignorant, and those who have less children are more intelligent. This has already been proven in studies. So it seems strange to say that Asians are smart when the obviousness of their backwards countries, and medieval lifestyle makes them contrary to that premise.

Europeans have the most advanced civilizations and every other race has yet to meet these levels other than the Japanese. The Japanese only being good at copying other people's inventions and making them better. Other than that their original creativity is lacking as well. They took American cars and made them better. They took the German camera and made it better. And they took German steel and made it better. Otherwise the greatest advances still come from Europeans and Jews. Other than that the Orientals have yet to produce an Einstein or a Thomas Edison.

When it comes to Black people. It makes sense that they have low intellectual comformity, I.e. IQ tests. They are far too creative to be trapped in this unoriginal form of conditioning. You can tell their creative capacity in their athletics, music, dance, and the way they talk. They by far exceed
E.C. | Homepage | 06.03.08 - 9:02 pm | #

$\"Gravatar\"$ Kick E.C.'s ass.
Maya | 01.11.09 - 6:48 pm | #

Commenting by HaloScan

$\"\"$ ");