|
|
p-ter
I like the fact that, so far, the evidence we find for natural selection in humans is only skin deep
of course, the genetics of things like skin color are now pretty well-known (am I really saying that? how times have changed...). so if you see 20 strong signals for selection, 15 of them are on genes of unknown function, and 5 are involved in skin color, you end up writing the paper about selection on skin color. but what do those other ones?
Email | Homepage | 10.17.07 - 1:02 pm | #
|
Jon Claerbout
"This is a very delicate time, and a dangerous time, as people start to come up with things that the general public, or the media, or various groups might misinterpret," Sabeti says. "I like the fact that, so far, the evidence we find for natural selection in humans is only skin deep."
Reading her article I find this quote is not so much her conclusion as it is something she throws in at the end to deflect hostile blowback.
Email | Homepage | 10.17.07 - 1:37 pm | #
|
Brian
She has a great phenotype by the way...
Email | Homepage | 10.17.07 - 5:47 pm | #
|
chet snicker
She has a great phenotype by the way...
sir,
i will not dispute the veracity of your claim, but truly is such public comment befitting a civilized gentleman? let us pay tribute to grace and beauty without a word but within our hearts.
sincerely
c.v. snicker
Email | Homepage | 10.17.07 - 6:24 pm | #
|
gene berman
Then we are to gather, Chet, that in a gentlemanly way, you're telling us "I'd hit it?"
Email | Homepage | 10.17.07 - 9:17 pm | #
|
Sandgroper
Like a rat up a drainpipe.
You can hardly blame her for the 'skin deep' pre-emptive defensive strategy.
Email | Homepage | 10.18.07 - 7:26 am | #
|
chet snicker
Then we are to gather, Chet, that in a gentlemanly way, you're telling us "I'd hit it?
sir!
a dark day indeed that a gentleman of senior stature as yourself should find it worthy to emit such vulgarities!
c.v. snicker
Email | Homepage | 10.18.07 - 12:04 pm | #
|
gene berman
chet:
A "gentlemen of senior stature" might point out that it's "utter" rather than "emit," while acknowledgeing that, though emissions are most frequently gaseous, utterances, including my own, occasionally fall into such category.
So, to express the original intended profundity in manner most deserving of your esteemed attention, I resort to the form practiced by those of the most advanced understanding (and whose most outstanding practitioners were William Shakespeare and Ogden Nash):
He who wouldn't say "I'd hit it"
Is, of course (and, alas) an idiot.
Email | Homepage | 10.24.07 - 4:58 am | #
|
gene berman
chet:
And, yes, I know (and both anticipate and forestall your pointing it out)--I seem to have a preference for doing it doggerel-style.
Email | Homepage | 10.24.07 - 5:04 am | #
|
Comment Preview:
|
|
|
Commenting by HaloScan.com
|