There's no scientific paper so important that Dembski will not overlook it; there's no intelligent design paper so obscure that he will not praise it. This is an artifact of the apologetic mindset.
Yeah, with this talk of renaming creationism again they certainly sound like they've consigned themselves to defeat. I wonder how truly deluded he's become after all these losses one after another.
Speaking of, wasn't Kansas supposed to be evolutions waterloo?
Wellington was at Waterloo, too.
kdn
Typical evolutionists.
Attack the person and not the issue at hand. Do you folk even know what ID is all about ? It is not a religeous following/science but a search for intelligence in various components within our universe. It is that simple.
Yes, some ID'ists are Christians but not the majority. But then, you all wouldn't know because it is far too easy to remark about a person and never look into the issue.
As to the graveyard comment, sounds like wishful thinking to me.
I apoligise in advance for being somewhat rude but the backlashing someone instead of the issue, is pure foolishness.
Waterloo? Just another stop on my commute. I can bet that if I'd read a Dembski essay, I'll probably be asleep by the time my train reaches Waterloo (one stop).
Seriously, though, he really doesn't get it. Waterloo, today, to the average Londoner, is not the place you want to be. It's a big, noisy railway station. Hardly conducive to rational thought or overthrowing the materialist blinders of Western science, whichever of those two mutually exclusive pursuits you wish to take part in. 
Wally said:
"Yes, some ID'ists are Christians but not the majority."
If the majority aren't Christians, then what are they? They're certainly not agnostics or atheists.
I think somebody (Wally) needs a reality check.
Commenting by HaloScan
