Red Tory v.2.0
Damn right Red...what a sad pathetic excuse for a human being that woman is.
While my libertarian leanings may have me favour less government intervention in life, I would not want mass starvation and death to occur to "teach us a lesson". Indeed, I would see less government intervention to prevent such horrors, not cause them.
She seems to enjoy suffering and she seems to like inflicting it on others. Psychopath perhaps?
I’m sure she'll get the desired reactions from the usual suspects… another one of her little "traps" I suppose. Then she will have the satisfaction of crowing victoriously that anyone who found her diatribe offensive simply didn’t get her satirical "joke" thereby proving her "point" — or something like that.
Perhaps she should follow some of her own advice about re-learning the "survival skills of our ancestors" and get off the computer and mind her own damn business.
What is it with her propensity to whine about whining? It's like the self-awareness section of her brain was surgically removed.
From Hare's Psychopathy Checklist Revised (PCL-R)
Factor1: Aggressive narcissism
1. Glibness/superficial charm
2. Grandiose sense of self-worth
3. Pathological lying
4. Conning/manipulative
5. Lack of remorse or guilt
6. Shallow affect
7. Callous/lack of empathy
8. Failure to accept responsibility for own actions
As KKKate would put it: Just sayin'...
I can say with the utmost pride that I've actually managed to get banned from her ridiculous site.
Needless to say, her article is a HUGE hit with the flying monkeys. They’re practically wetting themselves in delight! Here’s a classic comment from “Neil”:
Absolutely excellent Kate!! I can't wait to hear the leftards screaming that the right hates puppies and that Kate should be taken to court for suggesting cooking them, and then having to backtrack when they later find she is a dog lover. Leftards never do any research.
This is what passes for rational discourse over there.
Hmm, as opposed to calling someone KKKate, which obviously passes for "rational discourse" over here. The denizens of this site and their pack leader have no lessons to teach regarding "raional discourse", and they certainly can't credibly claim to offer any; certainly not by example.
My dear Barkman, KKKate earned that moniker through years of racism and bigotry, and the likes of you will not take it from her.
As for rational discourse, while we are snarky, here, and in other places, we are discussing how dear Kate completely misunderstood and misread Swift (if she ever indeed ever read him at all) so badly that she is actually proposing the exact opposite.
To believe we would be upset about the eating dogs comment shows just how much reason and rationality are missing from her fan base.
I suppose cracking a joke about the holocaust was the hight of rationality...
Now run along while the adults talk, like a good boy.
Nice stab at sanctimonious “holier-than-thou” snottiness there, Barkman. Why, I didn’t even called Kate a nasty name; something that many folks on the Right are always WHINING about. “Boo, hoo, hoo, hoo… those uncivil Leftards are always namecalling!!!” Isn't that how the great collective WHINE goes?
Hare's Psychopathy Checklist Revised (PCL-R)
Factor1: Aggressive narcissism
1. Glibness/superficial charm
2. Grandiose sense of self-worth
3. Pathological lying
4. Conning/manipulative
5. Lack of remorse or guilt
6. Shallow affect
7. Callous/lack of empathy
8. Failure to accept responsibility for own actions
Thanks b-nichol for posting this. It is a handy reference for describing many members of the Liberal party. In fact, you've nailed them perfectly.
Nice stab at sanctimonious “holier-than-thou” snottiness there, Barkman.
Hardly. Just pointing out the hypocrisy of you looking the other way when your little goblins say what they do while you squeal about "civil" or "rational" discourse". Heh. Convenient how that little trick always works for you, eh?
LindaL, especially 2, 4, and 8. Bang on.
hitler was a cunt!
i'm sorry. that was uncivil of me....
KEvron
Barkman — I said nothing about “civility” whatsoever. That's an absurd pretension of the Right these days, it seems. By the way, "civility" and "rationality" aren't the same thing.
At Tuesday, May 29, 2007 1:48:00 PM, Red Tory said…
Oh well. Leave her to her happy little insulated bubble of so-Con cheerleaders and liberal-haters, I guess. So much for civil discourse.
At Tue May 29, 04:17:00 PM EDT, Red Tory said…
In taking this position however I don’t think you’re doing much to bolster the case for civil discourse, but of course you’re perfectly entitled to insulate yourself from dissenting opinion that you find troublesome or irritating in some way.
============================
Barkman — I said nothing about “civility” whatsoever. That's an absurd pretension of the Right these days, it seems. By the way, "civility" and "rationality" aren't the same thing.
So what if they are obviously not?More "pretensions of the Right", as if you've never used both terms interchangeably "whatsoever" before.
*TSK, TSK* more of that #4 and #8 again. It must be the reasons why its so easy to be a Liberal. Google cache.....such a wonderful thing, n'est pas? :D
Hey, I'm not a Liberal. I'm a libertarian. And I don't give two shits about "civil discourse".
Respect is earned, Barkman, and when people like Kate belch out vile racist insults at natives, Jamaicans, and get their jollies out of making fun of the holocaust, they deserve everything they get, with both barrels. Her entire article is a mean-spirited misunderstanding of Swift. Unsurprising with her long line of angry rants against anything she doesn't agree with.
In short, she is hate-filled idiot and she is wrong. You can try to paper that over with some nonsense about "civility" and "discourse" and be an apologist for the worst kind of person there is, but it won't work.
Oh and for good measure, your quotes from Red are actual him skewering the conservative-held position that there should be more civil discourse - he is throwing it back in the face of some fairly uncivil BT and CPC supporters who often whine about it, not advocating it himself. Apparently, you are too stupid to understand the concept of sarcasm. No surprise there.
Now run along before the words get too big and the ideas get to complex for you. I wouldn't want to be uncivil to a whiny racist fool like you.
Hey, I'm not a Liberal. I'm a libertarian.
Well goody for you! :D I never said you were a Liberal, and
I really don't care WHAT you claim to be.
And I don't give two shits about "civil discourse".
Obviously.
Unsurprising with her long line of angry rants against anything she doesn't agree with.
This thread is a prime example of exactly that, as well as many others that are claiming to be Liberal or "progressive" blogs. And THAT is exactly why its hypocritical
In short, she is hate-filled idiot and she is wrong. You can try to paper that over with some nonsense about "civility" and "discoure" and be an apologist for the worst kind of person there is, but it won't work.
I didn't "apologize" for her. I'm sure Kate can handle the people here with ease. The words "civility" and "discourse" were not mine. They were the words of a hypocrite whining about its practice when he clearly doesn't even follow that idea himself, or conveniently and blatantly turns a blind eye when his syphocants do likewise.
Now run along before the words get too big and the ideas get to complex for you. I wouldn't want to be uncivil to a whiny racist fool like you.
Yes we wouldn't want THAT from a person who doesn't "give two shits" about being "uncivil". And lets see, what racist statments did I make, hmm? Oh thats right, none. Well, there we have #3. I wonder how quickly you can nail the other ones bang on.
As for the rest of your screed, well I leave you to your incoherent shrieking. Try not to at least not rack up the other numbers on that checklist too quickly.
Barkman — As a matter of fact, I don't use both terms interchangeably. But feel free to keep making up stuff.
"Google cache.....such a wonderful thing"
it certainly is. you should try using it to prove some sort of point sometime. even wonderfuller!
"as if you've never used both terms interchangeably 'whatsoever" before."
what? no cache? lol!
KEvron
"I've actually managed to get banned from her ridiculous site."
got dsl? re-boot your modem. i've gotten around a couple of her bans, and i'll eventually get around the current one. >
KEvron
friggin fancy emoticons?! ugh.
KEvron, old school
"your quotes from Red are actual him skewering the conservative-held position that there should be more civil discourse"
notice how dorkman conveniently failed to respond to this point? acknowledging this cogent point would undermine the obdurate little wad's silly game.
KEvron
KEv — People like "Barkman" lie through their teeth. They're not worth a warm bucket of spit.
By the way, were you serious about that comment regarding blogrolls over at StageLeft? I've thought of bringing mine back to life.
Commenting by HaloScan
