|
|
|
Maybe I'm just cynical, but there are a lot of people who will lie to make money. I'm not even surprised the NY Daily News is among them.
I am a bit wary of this juror though that you're talking to RWS. I can't think of a motive to lie in this case, but it seems awfully unlikely to be real to me.
Ben in Boston |
08.04.05 - 11:57 am | #
|
|
well the motive is a book deal of course.
I'm not saying they are lying, but it seems to me that if ALL the other jurors say they are, then they might have a credibility problem.
Rightwingsparkle |
08.04.05 - 12:02 pm | #
|
|
This is most likely semantics such as we saw from the O.J. Jurors. They thought he did it, but didn't think "beyond a reasonable doubt" that he did it.
We'll have to wait for the book to get the explanation. (Please God, don't let this trash make the best seller lists)
jandrewmorrison |
08.04.05 - 12:52 pm | #
|
|
You might be interested in the drift of the comments on my Beth Geisel post. The 'no big dealers' have hit their stride.
The Commissar |
Homepage |
08.04.05 - 1:31 pm | #
|
|
Commissar, OMG! It was like stumbling onto a Penthouse forum or something. I will not comment. I will just get grief!!
Rightwingsparkle |
08.04.05 - 2:52 pm | #
|
|
oh go ahead, get grief.
Dave in Texas |
08.04.05 - 8:06 pm | #
|
|
Commenting by HaloScan
|