How about a shameless (yet selfless!) plug for my effort to raise money for cancer research in memory of my friend Tom, who passed away this week?
Click for the link
I think that's a fine topic. I will be walking the survivor's lap tonight as a 14 year survivor of breast cancer. Beside me will be my mom as a 4 year survivor of lung cancer (non-smoker).
RWS: Your silence about the Bush leak says volumes. Bearshaft
Speaking of leaks... why does it seem that every lefty troll who comments here has already had all of their own brains leak out long ago. I never thought there could be that many people living without brains, but every time a lefty comments, they prove that thought wrong.
Bearshaft, your silence about the power of the President to declassify documents speaks volumes.
Once a President makes the decision to release info. to the press and public, it is NO LONGER CLASSIFIED.
He can do that. He's the Pres-o-dent!
the thread started out so positive.
Good job to andy and Linda. I love people doing things to make the world better.
bearshaft,
lauraw put it well. I've been reading about the leak thing with Pres. Bush and it seems like Pres. Bush can leak anything he wishes. I don't see the big deal. The only problem with leaks are when they affect national security.
The sudden press flap over Scooter Libby’s alleged “revelation” that President Bush declassified intelligence information related to Iraq is silly but all too predictable. The entire flap relies on mixing terms and “misunderstanding by innuendo” — a technique of demagoguery, not journalism. The flap is yet more evidence that the national press is more interested in playing “gotcha” with the Bush Administration than reporting the news.
Presidents and vice-presidents can declassify information based on their own good (or bad) judgment. That is a privilege and responsibility of the office. Their authority is near-absolute.Disseminating unclassified information isn’t a crime — no matter the technique used. The information can be disseminated at a press conference, in a press release, in a speech, or — yes– via leak. (UPDATE: Background links I should have included in the original post– though the president’s power in the sphere is common knowledge. The president is at the top of the Classification Authority hierarchy– he holds the ultimate clasification/declassification power. The vice-president is granted authority from the president. See this link to the relevant executive order regarding the vie-president. And I just found this article by Byron York which details the estension of presidential powers to the vice-president. York’s article emphasizes the formal codification of the vice-president’s classification powers, which is a change from past administrations.)
Reporters thrive on “leaks” because a leak usually means “scoop.” A leak can also mean “spin” but that’s an understood aspect of Washington’s political carnival. However, leaking properly declassified material isn’t a crime. Leaking classified material is illegal– and so is publishing classified material in a press release.
read the reat at Austin Bay Blog
http://austinbay.net/blog/?p=1025
Linda - despite any of our differences, glad you and your mom are still in the world. Cancer's an awful, awful disease... worst for my friend, he was only 40 and they don't even encourage regular colorectal exams until 50.
So, everyone, there's my advice: even if you're not 50 yet, go pay the doctor out of pocket to put a camera up your butt.
It's true, we are not promised tomorrow.
We might all do well to think about that today.
I was only 39 when I had breast cancer. They don't suggest mammograms for women of that age either. I found it myself and pressured the doctors into tests. Sometimes we have to take responsibility for our bodies when we know something is not just right. I needed to live as I was raising 3 children alone. Had I waited for the doctors...I wouldn't be here.
Sorry...off my soapbox.
"We might all do well to think about that today."
True enough. Please take a moment on behalf of a young colleague. He was a good doctor (neurology resident), just starting out. http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/m...ws/
14262466.htm
How very sad.
Sometimes we have to take responsibility for our bodies when we know something is not just right.
Agreed. Unfortunately, Tom had no inkling of what was going on inside of him until he developed really severe abdominal pain while we were at lunch one day - a couple of weeks later he told me the news, Stage D colorectal cancer. Just too late to stop it. 
Heh - sorry to hear about your colleague.
Someone say something happy and joyous to balance out the three of us...
Well I have two friends who totally beat breast cancer and have been fine for years.
My mom has emphysema from 50 YEARS of smoking. and they just came out with a new drug that has made her feel 20 yrs younger she says.
My new dog is still adorable and I LOVE HER!
I've lost 5 lbs just in time for bathing suit season.
My daughter is dating a WONDERFUL boy that I introduced her to in hopes of love......I can't beleive my devious plan actually worked. Jewish moms have NOTHING on me.
My son is coming home today for Easter break and I'm very very excited.
Enough good news????
I just saved a bunch of money on car insurance with Geico
My oldest son, the political science major, is headed to France for a week (dates a girl at his school from France). I sure hope the riots are over as I can see him jumping right into the big middle of it!!!
And Dave makes me laugh for the third time today.
Wanna go for four?
Four? Please baby, I am not from Havana!
I'll give you a laugh. With all this cancer talk...I remembered it was time for my mammogram so called to make the appointment. The guy on the phone was asking his list of questions and asked if I had my breast removed due to cancer....I thought about it for a moment and then I said...no, I did it to lose weight!!! What in the world kind of question was THAT????
C'MON beer thirty!
Gee Linda,
You raised your kids alone and then went through that hell and you are still standing strong.
No wonder your boys turned out so great.
The hand that rocks the cradle rules the world.
Stage D colorectal cancer.
===============
So was he a homosexual?
RWS, For once you disagree with the little baboon, i.e., he has been telling us all along that he despises leaks. You seem to think that if the king leaks it is o.k., but anyone else does it, woe be to them. Is it because the little baboon is smart and he just knows what is appropriate to leak. If so, why doesn't he just say it, "It is o.k. if I leak because I am so smart, but nobody else can leak because that just don't know what they are doing.
Bearshaft
I just lost another loan to Ditech.
Poor Bearshaft. This latest non scandal lasted all of 5 minutes before it was shot down.
Back to the drawing board. Lol.
The president ordered information be released, and people released it for him to channels of his choosing. This is completely legal and within his powers.
Your BDS is showing, and it amuses us.
So was he a homosexual?
(Assuming alessandra actually posted that).
No, you worthless sack of shit disguised as a human being. He was a happily married newlywed to a beautiful bride. He was generous and compassionate and accepted everyone regardless of who they were. He was the kind of person you could hold up as an example for us all, on how we should live and treat one another and embrace life to the fullest.
That you even think such a question is remotely funny, let alone appropriate, is an indicator that you are an examplar of what is wrong with humanity, a walking genetic defect whose dad should have kept his dick in his pants and spare the world such a stinking twat of a woman.
Of course, if that was just someone pretending to be you, then simply cut and paste and apply it to them.
The issue is wether the the President's image in the New York Times is more important than revealing the identity of a covert operative who gathers information on the WMD capabilities of countries in the Middle East like IRAQ and IRAN.
The President is the one only one who can make that decision and this President chose to leak the information to help his image. His approval rating last July of '03 was around 58%, and he was willing to do this to "protect himslef". Damn, can't he even do that right?
alessandra, that might be the rudest thing I've ever seen you write. No small feat, that.
That you even think such a question is remotely funny, let alone appropriate, is an indicator that you are an examplar of what is wrong with humanity, a walking genetic defect whose dad should have kept his dick in his pants and spare the world such a stinking twat of a woman.
+++++++++++++++++
oh look! a liberal vomitting excrement! how cute that you think you call people all kinds of vulgarity every time they ask something you don't like.
If you have anything work that requires a licence, it should be taken away.
And, in case, other people aren't completely ignorant as you are, the question is totally pertinent, given the much higher incident of rectal cancer in male homosexuals. Now what could cause that, I wonder??? Hard to figure out...
That's just how natural homosexuality is.
Really alessandra, totally wrong and rude. No more please.
And andy, although she deserved your rip, no 's' word Please! I really hate that word.
alessandra,
The question might be perinent in a scientific study BUT NOT WHEN SOMEONE HAS JUST SAID THIER FRIEND HAS DIED.
alessandra, that might be the rudest thing I've ever seen you write. No small feat, that.
+++++++++++++++++
And why is asking if someone with rectal cancer was a homosexual rude?
Does it break the silence on a topic that you all polite-pretending people don't like face?
If you think there is nothing wrong in being a homosexual, why is it rude if anyone asks if someone is a homosexual independently if they are dead or alive?
Uh, you don't get that? You're homo obsession actually made you ask a guy if his dead friend was gay?
I suppose that's how obsessions are, huh? People don't actually get it that they're "obsessed". Then they say stupid insulting stuff and go "whaaa?" when called on it. THEN they dance around with crap like "what don't you think you can FACE my truth"?
I'm not the one having trouble facing things.
If Andy thinks people sexually torturing each other is "mentally healthy," as he has already stated here, what is he complaining about someone asking if his dead friend was a homosexual with colon trouble?
Noooooo contradiction there whatsoever.
Dave, btw, what's your position on SM?
Are you like Andy?
"Then they say stupid insulting stuff "
What's so insulting about asking if someone is homosexual? In your enlightened view of the world, isn't it like asking if he was French or Italian?
My position on sadomasochism? Sick stuff. If we are using the terms in the same way.
Somehow I suspect you're not.
And you didn't ask the dead guy if he was gay. You asked his friend.
Recognizing you don't get it, I'll leave the topic alone now. Personally though you might want to consider brushing up on your manners. I disagree with Andy politically and culturally, but I'm not an ass about it.
usually.
manners?? In my neck of the woods talking like that will cause profuse bleeding of the mouth, even if the one doing the talking is a girl.
Not directed at you Dit, directed at the human waste that "thought" her comment was appropriate.
How about how to get Google to remove the sex predator blog they have appearing on blogger.com.
Read more at my site. Trust me, you'll be outraged.
Good luck Stacy, Google loves free speech except in China. You've got a full plate.
And why is asking if someone with rectal cancer was a homosexual rude?
Because (a) it's irrelevant and (b) I know your bigoted angle on the whole affair, and given that I read your asinine question not 10 minutes after returning from the memorial service for my friend, my reaction, as rude as it was, was wholly justified.
Gosh, maybe next you'll display your amazing ignorance by asking an AIDS victim if they ever sat on a public toilet seat.
If I was talking to a complete dipshit who associated being Italian with every societal ill and medical ill, I'd go off on him if he asked "Oh, was he Italian?"
If I was talking to a racist asshole, I'd go off on him if he asked "Oh, was he black?"
It's not just the question being asked, it's the fucktard doing the asking. Christ, if he was gay you'd probably be tap dancing on his grave, huh, you damnable idiot?
RWS, my profuse apologies for my language. However, I would ask that you keep my words as they stand, as I think they are a justified response to alessandra.
dave and Dave in Texas, thanks for your support. I'm sure we'll argue about something again, but for now it's nice to agree that alessandra's a headcase.
That's just how natural homosexuality is.
And I suppose all those STDs readily transmitted through heterosexual intercourse are just the "cost of doing business," huh, alessandra?
God, but you're an imbecile.
P.S. Still waiting for your "yes" or "no" on whether or not you were sexually abused.
RWS, my profuse apologies for my language. However, I would ask that you keep my words as they stand, as I think they are a justified response to alessandra.
Can't blame him for his response, it was provoked, RWS... I push the rules too, but it may be time to lower the boom. You've had a few other complaints, maybe it's time to let the chips fall...
RWS - I rescind my question on the sexual abuse. To bring up the subject is unfair to others who might not be comfortable with the topic for whatever reason.
I'd like to use it to verbally bludgeon the woman, but I think even my friend Tom would be disappointed in that.
sounds like a good place to let it rest, but your milage may very
andy,
I would have gotten just as angry.
I think the entire blogging community could use some lessons in manners. I don't see why people can't make their point without personally insulting someone.
We say things on the net we would NEVER say to a person in person.
I have a nieghbor who I dislike. I could tell you the many reasons and I think you would agree with me, but suffice to say he is a jerk. There are not many people that I don't like. I usually find something interesting in everyone.
He has been my neighbor for 3 yrs and he still invites us over all the time for cookouts and the like. Sometimes I go, most of the time I make an excuse.
My point is that he doesn't have a clue that I don't like him. It is possible to show your best face even when you don't want to.
Hey Sparkle, the house next door is for sale!
And I know how to do genuine Texas barbecue! You can come over any time. Seriously, I have a hand-welded barbecue rig imported into Ohio by me from when I lived in San Antonio. I doubt there is another one like it in the state. Up here, they think they're doing barbecue when they're just grillin' meat.
Can I give your name to the real estate agent?
I could use a neighbor that pretends to like me.
:>)
Dave Texas : My position on sadomasochism? Sick stuff.
+++++++++++++++++++
OK, so let us suppose Andy here, who thinks SM is just fine, has just gotten back from his friend's memorial service, and he decides to practice this fine SM, like burning cigarettes on people, who for the sickest reasons possible, have "consented" to it.
And then he gets online and screams all this verbal garbage because I asked if his friend was homosexual.
Cute, eh?
Oh, RWS, do you think burning cigarettes on people is polite or, like Andy, do you think it depends on the context?
alessandra,
The question might be perinent in a scientific study BUT NOT WHEN SOMEONE HAS JUST SAID THIER FRIEND HAS DIED.
Rightwingsparkle
===================
RWS, andy is a guy who has stated he believes sexual torture is legitimate and fine. How am I suppose to know that his friend didn't die from having so much junk violently shoved up his ass which caused so much damage it started off a cancerous process?
If andy here thinks sexual violence is quite legitimate, just what kind of people could he have for his friends? It could be anyone who does anything, as far as what he states here.
andy: And why is asking if someone with rectal cancer was a homosexual rude?
Because (a) it's irrelevant and (b) I know your bigoted angle on the whole affair
======================
If the medical stats show that homosexual men have much higher rates of backend cancer, first of all, this is a fact, secondly, it's relevant, and thirdly, it's knowlegde, as opposed to your ignorant denial.
If RWS said a friend of hers had died of pneumoconiosis, and I asked if her friend was a miner, would that be ghastly rude, irrelevant, and bigoted?
This is why your fanatical pro-homosexuality is so detrimental to society. You choose to ignore every type of death and harm causing problem related to sexuality because of your demented liberal politics.
And you should be verbally bludgeoned for it.
How am I suppose to know that his friend didn't die from having so much junk violently shoved up his ass which caused so much damage it started off a cancerous process?
====================
Oh, Andy, the above is just one example of what you think is mentally healthy and legitimate sexual behavior, it's what happens in homo SM. Not to mention all the emotional violence involved.
Whether you practice it, we don't know, but you endorse it and promote it publicly.
You know what I think of people who endorse sexual violence? You are the scum of the earth.
"you worthless sack of shit disguised as a human being"
Yes, that's you, all right.
Gosh, maybe next you'll display your amazing ignorance by asking an AIDS victim if they ever sat on a public toilet seat.
+++++++++++++++++++++
No, it's like asking them if they share needles or practice unsafe sex.
It's like asking when someone who was diagnosed with advanced lung cancer if they are a chain smoker.
Hey, RWS, did you see the testimony regarding child porn on the O'Reilly factor? ("Protecting Our Kids")
There is a moving testimony by a teenage boy who tells how he abused for five years by men, starting at 13, including online pornography. That's because homosexual and bisexual men do not prey on adolescent boys. Never. Listen to Andy's lies about homosexuality if you want to hear more and more testimonies like this in the future. Hey, maybe one day, it will be a child you know.
Meanwhile you can spend your energy saying how little polite some people are on your blog. It's easier than doing something about how sexually violent homosexuals and bisexuals are.
You know, if it were for pro-homosexuals we would only be allowed to talk about how heterosexuals prey on kids - they want complete silence about how violent non-heterosexuals are.
Another reason why pro-homosexuals are so detrimental to society.
Andy: And I suppose all those STDs readily transmitted through heterosexual intercourse are just the "cost of doing business," huh, alessandra?
=================
Actually, the epidemics of STD transmission can only be the result of mass sexual promiscuity, another dandy aspect of liberal sexual culture. And of legitimizing and endorsing prostitution, as opposed to ending it.
You also endorse sexual promiscuity, don't you, andy? And prostitution?
alessandra, do you know why it was wrong for Robertson and Falwell to speculate that 9/11 was God's judgement on our society for it's sexual deviance?
Because they focused on one sin, and judged it right along with God. Because they presumed that homosexuality is worse than my unspoken lust, or cheating on taxes, or selfish flash of anger, or any number of the thousands of sins I commit.
You are in Fred Phelps territory right now. Uncontrolled screeching over the one sin you judge the most. And you need to quit it.
Not for us. For you.
alessandra, that might be the rudest thing I've ever seen you write. No small feat, that.
Dave in Texas
+++++++++++++++++
Dave, funny, isn't it, how I don't have all that much respect for people who endorse sexual violence, rape, battering, (which are all part of SM) or child abuse and a myriad other types of violence in society.
Really, I can care less about politeness when talking to such garbage of people.
bet you can't stop.
I can
alessandra, do you know why it was wrong for Robertson and Falwell to speculate that 9/11 was God's judgement on our society for it's sexual deviance?
Because they focused on one sin, and judged it right along with God. Because they presumed that homosexuality is worse than my unspoken lust, or cheating on taxes, or selfish flash of anger, or any number of the thousands of sins I commit.
You are in Fred Phelps territory right now. Uncontrolled screeching over the one sin you judge the most. And you need to quit it.
Not for us. For you.
Dave in Texas
=================
Actually, you've just made a big distortion. Lots of people think that God goes out and does violence in the world and I recently wrote a long post about some problematic fundaments in Christianity, you can read it here, if you would like, but it counter argues part of your post.
"Because they presumed that homosexuality is worse than my unspoken lust, or cheating on taxes, or selfish flash of anger, or any number of the thousands of sins I commit."
The issue is, Dave, we have several multi-million dollar political groups who do nothing but legitimate every form of sexual violence and deviance that exists on the Earth. This includes the pro-homos, the pro-pornography, the pro-SM, the pro-prostitution, the pro-prosmicuity, the pro-abortion-anytime people. I would say the pro-homos are the loudest, but certainly not the only garbage of organized detrimental group in society.
Is there a huge organized political group trying to institute cheating of taxes as right and moral at the same time they decry citizens who pay taxes as paranoid, bigotted, and full of hate?
This is the difference between your (false) comparison of cheating taxes and criticism of pro-homosexuality.
"You are in Fred Phelps territory right now. Uncontrolled screeching over the one sin you judge the most. And you need to quit it."
The personal is political. And politics is made for talking, not for censorship. You would like silence in view of this monstrous reality we have? How cute.
You have arguments against something I state? Put them forward. I am writing lots of stuff that contradicts your views? Is that the reason for the characterization of "screeching?" Not surprising. But I think your characterization is profoundly distorted.
alessandra : You are perhaps one of the most vile, insulting, sanctimounious asses that we have seen around here.
Andy, sorry for your loss.
At the same time, I would not ban the one that seems to be so mortally terrified of "the gay". Just like hateful speech, bringing those types of beliefs and attitudes into the light of day is good for us all.
JD - thanks for your support.
alessandra -
Yes, colorectal cancers are higher among homosexual men. However, the most recent documents at pubmed indicate that insufficient work has been done to determine the role of STDs and HIV in this fact. I've not seen a study that investigates "so much junk shoved up there violently."
Of course, you've just given the lie to your entire argument. You argue against homosexuals themselves, when the only things you can even remotely logically argue against are (a) promiscuity and (b) anal intercourse. Given that heterosexuals engage in said behaviors as well, your argument against homosexuality itself illustrates that you are nothing but a sad, jaded bigot.
Further, I provided a link to my friend's story - very first comment. Had you clicked on it, you would have known the answer to your question without even having to let your gnarled witchy fingers touch the keyboard.
That you didn't do this is yet more evidence that you wanted a statistic to support your bigotry. Well, bitch, he was my friend, not your statistic.
Not that you'll see the error of your ways, as your worldview has obviously been warped by the trauma we shall not mention, but the general response to the news that someone's friend has died is: "Oh, I'm sorry to hear that?" You lack even the most basic human decency.
Hey, if nothing else, you've encouraged my continued atheism. My friend, a beautiful human being, dies a horrible death, and yet you still walk among us.
P.S.
Yes, that's you, all right.
Snappy comeback! I see your humor and sarcasm are as refined and developed as your interpersonal skills!
I suppose I missed andy's endorsement of sexual torture.
This is the thing. I probably agree wtih alessandra on what is sexual sin or deviance. But there is a way to make a point without insulting everyone around you.
I think I can say without a doubt that andy does not approve of homosexuals or bi sexuals abusing young boys.
I am also sure that there are many sexual practices that andy does approve of that I do not.
I think andy is of the mind that those who are adult and consenting may do as they wish. In a democracy, with privacy and such, I must agree. But that doesn't mean that I don't think that those practices are not sinful or, in the long run, unhealthy and wrong in every way.
But people are free to make bad choices and as long as it doesn't involve an unwilling partner or a child, then I have to live with that because I live in a free country.
I have no doubt in one well known phrase though "You reap what you sow." People are free to be sexual perverts, but they will suffer the consequences of those actions. In this world and in the next.
But people are free to make bad choices and as long as it doesn't involve an unwilling partner or a child, then I have to live with that because I live in a free country.
Ding ding ding. We have a winner. 
I also don't approve of heterosexuals abusing young children, which - apparently - alessandra thinks doesn't happen. Of course, she's a whackjob.
(Rom 12:17-21 NASB) Never pay back evil for evil to anyone. Respect what is right in the sight of all men. {18} If possible, so far as it depends on you, be at peace with all men. {19} Never take your own revenge, beloved, but leave room for the wrath of God, for it is written, "VENGEANCE IS MINE, I WILL REPAY," says the Lord. {20} "BUT IF YOUR ENEMY IS HUNGRY, FEED HIM, AND IF HE IS THIRSTY, GIVE HIM A DRINK; FOR IN SO DOING YOU WILL HEAP BURNING COALS UPON HIS HEAD." {21} Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.
Gee Michael! You are such a holy roller!!
alessandra : You are perhaps one of the most vile, insulting, sanctimounious asses that we have seen around here.
Andy, sorry for your loss.
JD
=================
Don't tell me I was describing you in my criticisms above? My opinion of you mirrors yours of mine.
Another violent cheap ignorant liberal calling other people vile for breaking up their self-denial party?
you worthless sack of shit disguised as a human being.
you are an examplar of what is wrong with humanity, a walking genetic defect whose dad should have kept his dick in his pants and spare the world such a stinking twat of a woman.
a complete dipshit
racist asshole,
the fucktard , you damnable idiot?
RWS, my profuse apologies for my language.
RWS - I rescind my question on the sexual abuse. To bring up the subject is unfair to others who might not be comfortable with the topic for whatever reason.
=======================
Oh cmon Andy. Who are you fooling? The more sexual torture you hear about, the more you salivate, the more that sick mind of yours just gets going.
Your dying to hear about ANY sexual abuse aren't you? Sexual abuse really makes you comfortable, doesn't it? Just like your verbal abuse here. it's not others "comfort level" you're worried about. You took back the question because it showed to this little crowd just how sick your mind is. But you came to my blog to post it. Too much of a tripe to show who you really are here? Keeping up the façade to fool RWS?
That's why you can't say two words of any argument without profanity and some sort of verbal aggression. That's what your little homo-obsessive sanctimony amounts to.
As I answered you on my blog, calling on people like you about their violent and irresponsible minds does not require having been abused. It requires knowledge and character. Both of which you are missing.
==================
RWS: But there is a way to make a point without insulting everyone around you.
==================
Apparently that illudes liberals who can't say two words without vommiting the excrement they have between their ears.
You also endorse sexual promiscuity, don't you, andy? And prostitution?
=================
So Andy, aside from spitting out swearwords in every post, and endorsing varied forms of physical and sexual torture, you haven't yet confirmed how much your mind stinks regarding other sexuality problems such as promiscuity and prostitution.
Cute sanctimonious position you "stand on." Or sink completely through.
This is why pro-homosexuals are obsessive. They have the most stinking minds that denigrate sexuality in every possible way and get on the highest hypocritical high horse.
alessandra -
No, I rescined the question because, at the time, I felt it was not appropriate. Now that you've continued your irrational blathering, I have little problem asking it, because I think it would help others to know just what made your mind go so wonky somewhere along the way.
As for your other questions:
a) I'm not promiscuous; I'm not going to stop others from being so.
b) I don't frequent prostitutes; I'm not going to stop others from doing so. It's a violent and dangerous profession because of people like you that force it into the dark corners of society. Legalize it, regulate it, and you'd have nothing to rant about.
You're quite possibly the most amusing idiot I've met on the internet.
This will pain you to hear, but you're no different from a far lefty liberal - you both want to control the lives and livelihoods of others, just by different means. You're both the worst kind of moral offender, thinking you have the right to dictate to others how they should live; to tell them that what they own, from their money (the lefty liberal) to their body (the crazy conservative), is not theirs and that you know better how it should be used. You're a little dictator-wanna-be spouting off on the net.
(P.S. I voted for Dubya - go figure that one out. I suspect you can't, given your us vs them, black/white, simpleminded mentality that makes my 3 yr old look like a genius).
Sparkly, you wonder why I don't comment here much anymore? Take a look at the above.
Sorry, Wonderduck, but when someone wants to use my dead friend, not even in the ground yet, as some kind of justification for their bigotry, I'm not going to be nice about it.
Andy, it isn't you I'm talking about. Your comments are completely understandable under the circumstances.
Oh, nevermind then.
andy with the ugly mind wrote--
That you even think such a question is remotely funny, let alone appropriate, is an indicator that you are an examplar of what is wrong with humanity, a walking genetic defect whose dad should have kept his dick in his pants and spare the world such a stinking twat of a woman.
+++++++++++++++++
alessandra:
oh look! a liberal vomitting excrement! how cute that you think you call people all kinds of vulgarity every time they ask something you don't like.
And, in case, other people aren't completely ignorant as you are, the question is totally pertinent, given the much higher incident of rectal cancer in male homosexuals. Now what could cause that, I wonder??? Hard to figure out...
That's just how natural homosexuality is.
alessandra | Homepage | 04.07.06 - 6:13 pm | #
================
Anal Cancer: Homosexuals are at increased risk for this rare type of cancer, which is potentially fatal if the anal-rectal tumors metastasize to other bodily organs.
· Dr. Joel Palefsky, a leading expert in the field of anal cancer, reports that while the incidence of anal cancer in the United States is only 0.9/100,000, that number soars to 35/100,000 for homosexuals. That rate doubles again for those who are HIV positive, which, according to Dr. Palefsky, is "roughly ten times higher than the current rate of cervical cancer."[49]
· At the Fourth International AIDS Malignancy Conference at the National Institutes of Health in May, 2000, Dr. Andrew Grulich announced that the incidence of anal cancer among homosexuals with HIV "was raised 37-fold compared with the general population."[50]
50. "Studies Point to Increased Risks of Anal Cancer."
================
andy the slur-thrower wrote:
You're quite possibly the most amusing idiot I've met on the internet.
=================
speak for yourself, you're ignorant, fanatic, and have a putrid little mind.
It's not just the question being asked, it's the fucktard doing the asking. Christ, if he was gay you'd probably be tap dancing on his grave, huh, you damnable idiot?
===============
Please save your ad hominen attacks.
PRO-homosexuality, PRO-pornography, PRO-prostitution is the problem. Whoever endorses sexual violence, sexual exploitation, sexual dysfunction as healthy is a monster, andy. They can be heterosexual or non-heterosexual, white or black, men or women, young or old, the harm is the same.
I have to say, though, that the day you and all those PRO-sexual-violence people like you are off the surface of the Earth, not only will it smell better, but the world will be less violent.
That's what you amount to.
Yes, colorectal cancers are higher among homosexual men. However, the most recent documents at pubmed indicate that insufficient work has been done to determine the role of STDs and HIV in this fact.
==================
It doesn't change the fact that the numbers are tremendously higher for homosexuals and specially those with certain STDs.
It is a FACT.
It is not irrelevant. It shows the extent to which a society that is obsessive with pro-homosexuality will do to lie and deceive people about the problems with homosexuality and its biggest sexual practice.
That's why you have an ugly mind. It's your bigotry that I'm referring to.
RWS:
I think I can say without a doubt that andy does not approve of homosexuals or bi sexuals abusing young boys.
================
That's right. andy here just thinks that rape, and prostitution, and promiscuity, and the desecration and destruction of everything that is beautiful and sacred and healthy in personal relationships, like taking a cord and asphixiating people, or burning them with cigarettes, or battering and breaking their bones, or inflicting humiliation and verbal abuse and psychological abuse and terror and enemas and mutilation and renactment of every form of child abuse dynamics in adults is just fine.
He's such a good person! After all the above, he adds that doesn't think child abuse is right. What a lofty mind he has.
An example: there is a boy being raped to death by some homo monster is andy here is like "Oh yeah, that may not be right, because they are under 18." But it just goes on, because little pro-homo shits NEVER take action or speak out against it. Have you ever heard andy here speak out on how homos abuse adolescent boys? He's too much of piece of garbage to do that (and so is every other pro-homo that thinks like him).
Continuing the story, so the boy is being abused, for years on end, and he gets so destroyed inside that he doesn't know anymore what it is to have mental health. And andy here is just salivating until this boy turns 18, because then he is not a "child" anymore and andy can say in his most vile and devious mind, 'oh look, SM time, I'm going to rape you till you die and burn you with cigarettes and that's because you like it! And yeah, it's a free country! God bless American and freedom fighters like me. Oh, and Alessandra, you are a pile of shit because you don't clap at all of this.'
You pro-homosexuals have such ugly minds.
b) I don't frequent prostitutes; I'm not going to stop others from doing so. It's a violent and dangerous profession because of people like you that force it into the dark corners of society. Legalize it, regulate it, and you'd have nothing to rant about.
==================
that's because you don't stop anyone from perpetrating any kind of sexual violence, exploitation, or harassment.
"people like you that force it into the dark corners of society. "
Another one of your strawmen distortions. I haven't written that, so try arguing something I wrote.
And try reading up on how destroyed the emotional lives prostitutes are before you post here again. Not to mention the history of substance and alcohol abuse. The same with a lot of porn people.
Oh I forget, I'm talking to someone who favors sexual torture of people, you wouldn't be able to grasp what I am talking about here, like having a human heart.
alessandra : You are perhaps one of the most vile, insulting, sanctimounious asses that we have seen around here.
Andy, sorry for your loss.
JD | 04.08.06 - 9:26 am | #
===================
Maybe you oughta take that bloated head of yours out of the sand and hear what child abusers say when they are abusing children.
You've never heard of that before have, you? Oh I forget, that's not vile for people like you.
Or when pimps are battering and raping prostitutes. You don't think that's very vile.
Or when there is one more incident of domestic violence that ends up in spouse murder. Not very vile, is it?
Or when another teenager is raped on a date. Or when some sadistic garbage decides to sexually torture another human being for fun; or when every form of deviant behavior is touted as fun on video games or the largest and most profuse database of every type of vile and violent sexual attitudes, values, and behaviors, which is pornography.
Well, for a deaf and dumb and alienated piece of garbage like you, I'm sure the most "vile" thing your sick mind has ever managed to take notice of is a question if a rectal colon cancer guy is a homosexual. And given that homosexuals do have higher rates of colon cancer, just like miners have higher rates of lung disease, your characterisation of the question as vile is nothing but a hate post, an ad hominen attack.
You pro-homosexuals have such ugly minds.
andy:
JD - thanks for your support.
andy
================
Any sick and violent minded person who is looking for support has found the right blog! hahahahh
all you child rapists, molesters, the adult sickos, pimps, spouse batterers, pornographers, come one and all to RWS's!
As long as you don't ask about ugly FACTS regarding homosexuals and disease, they will give you all their support and more, there may be money to be made. Right here.
If you are selling your stuff, lots of opportunity, given that here is the blog of the free, the liberated, the pergrassives!
(and they call other people extremists!! ooh boogie man!!)
This will pain you to hear, but you're no different from a far lefty liberal - you both want to control the lives and livelihoods of others, just by different means.
===================
Speaking of yourself?
What are you trying to achieve here but control? You want no accountability for destructive, violent behavior (physical, psychological and sexual). You are a total parasite.
"You're both the worst kind of moral offender, thinking you have the right to dictate to others how they should live; "
I do have the right to tell child abusers, rapists, torturers, and all others who perpetrate violence that not only they aren't healthy, they don't belong in society.
It is my right not to live in a violent pigsty.
It is my right to protect other people from your monstrous attitudes which then engender and ensure a very violent society.
It is my right to care and not to be a sexual insensitive nazi like you.
"You're a little dictator-wanna-be spouting off on the net."
It is also my right to expose how ugly your mind is even though you try to camouflage it behind a discourse of freedom and rights.
Alessandra-
I think it fair to warn you that someday, I will find you, and when I do-I will punch you in the face.
That's all.
And it will hurt.
. . .
You're not a very good person, I don't think.
What are you trying to achieve here but control?
Errr...by wanting others to control their own lives, I really want to control their lives?
You're not so good with this whole logic concept, are you?
Oh wait, of course you're not.
I do have the right to tell child abusers, rapists, torturers, and all others who perpetrate violence that not only they aren't healthy, they don't belong in society.
Are you against boxing? What about rugby? Professional wrestling? Football?
All very violent. With willing participants. Of course, no weiners or hoohahs are involved, so you probably don't mind.
It is my right not to live in a violent pigsty.
Awesome! When are you leaving? I'll throw you a going-away party - with strippers!
It is my right to protect other people from your monstrous attitudes which then engender and ensure a very violent society.
Attitudes don't hurt, punkin - actions do. I support punishing actions against unwilling victims, not the thoughts inside someone's head.
It is my right to care and not to be a sexual insensitive nazi like you.
Does this mean the discussion is over? Calling Godwin...
It is also my right to expose how ugly your mind is even though you try to camouflage it behind a discourse of freedom and rights.
Yeah, freedom and rights are evil in your world, I know. Remember, dear, you're the dictator wanna-be.
And a complete wacko.
After reading so many of her comments in this thread I can confidently assert that Allesandra is not a troll. She is not a good troll in that nothing she writes is even remotely amusing. Nor is she a bad troll, because even bad trolls sneak off sooner or later to giggle about their dubious wit.
She's a perpetual 15 year old. A woman-child insisting at great length and in great volume how the world is supposed to be. But utterly incapable of accepting the world as it is.
Allie, child, you can develop colo-rectal cancer. Sometimes it just happens. Polyps in the poopchute happen to the just and the unjust fellow.
Now go to your room and think long and hard about your behavior. And no tv.
After reading so many of her comments in this thread I can confidently assert that Allesandra is not a troll. She is not a good troll in that nothing she writes is even remotely amusing. Nor is she a bad troll, because even bad trolls sneak off sooner or later to giggle about their dubious wit.
She's a perpetual 15 year old. A woman-child insisting at great length and in great volume how the world is supposed to be. But utterly incapable of accepting the world as it is.
Allie, child, you can develop colo-rectal cancer. Sometimes it just happens. Polyps in the poopchute happen to the just and the unjust fellow.
Now go to your room and think long and hard about your behavior. And no tv.
===============
Alan, please go on accepting all the violence and destruction there is in the world, thanks to your endorsement, inanity, and collusion.
I won't ask you to reflect about your parasitical attitudes and views, because it's clear it's out of your grasp. Just as it is for Andy.
It is my right to protect other people from your monstrous attitudes which then engender and ensure a very violent society.
Attitudes don't hurt, punkin - actions do. I support punishing actions against unwilling victims, not the thoughts inside someone's head.
=====================
Where does the concept of "hate speech" being a crime come from, andy? Where do actions come from? Oh you are far too moronic to know. There's no relationship between what people think and the attitudes they have and how they behave.
Can you possibly be more stupid, andy?
Any sick and violent minded person who is looking for support has found the right blog! hahahahh
=================
Alessandra-
I think it fair to warn you that someday, I will find you, and when I do-I will punch you in the face.
That's all.
Foster
=================
As I was saying about the violent people who make speeches on morality here...
What are you trying to achieve here but control?
Errr...by wanting others to control their own lives, I really want to control their lives?
=================
Any time the state has crumbled in a society, what you have ensue is chaotic violent behavior, a lot of it directed from civilians to civilians. But that's just when it's extreme, our society has a huge amount of violence, even with the state and those a tiny amount of ethics and rules you hate.
you love to see adults practicing violence without accountability, so, yes, what you end up enforcing is the lack of human rights, by taking away the controls which are necessary to ensure them.
I do have the right to tell child abusers, rapists, torturers, and all others who perpetrate violence that not only they aren't healthy, they don't belong in society.
Are you against boxing? What about rugby? Professional wrestling? Football?
All very violent. With willing participants. Of course, no weiners or hoohahs are involved, so you probably don't mind.
====================
I look at Mohammed Ali with his retarted brain functions because of boxing, and I see, well now that probably explains where andy comes from.
oh and playing a game of rugby is exactly the same as being tortured to death.
That sicko mind of yours is showing again.
You're not a very good person, I don't think.
Foster
==================
That's right, Foster. You see, I don't approve of rape, of sexual abuse and harassment, of mental diseases, of prostitution, of conditioning people to have attitudes that support and endorse a sexually violent society (which includes pornography), of degrading human beings in every which way regarding personal relationships and sexuality.
So you are so right, that's the picture of a very bad person. I'm sure your parents were the very opposite of me, at least that's a plausible explanation to have a kid like you.
I think it fair to warn you that someday, I will find you, and when I do-I will punch you in the face.
That's all.
Foster
=================
Oh and you know what is really interesting, you will never go out and punch a person who sexually abused a child or who raped an adult, or who sexually tortured a human being, or who produced child porn. Never.
That's just how cowardly you are. That's how sordid your mind is. Those are not a problem for you, are they?
But you threaten to punch a woman who speaks out on how much sexual violence you and andy endorse in this world, Foster?
That's the stuff you're made of.
Wow, alessandra spent 14 days on a rant. Just another example of why not to use meth!
Commenting by HaloScan
