I am appalled and disgusted by BlogActive outing Republican gays. It is disgusting! How dare he feel he has a right to reveal personal information on people just because they disagree with his politics! These people aren't cheating or stealing. They are just working and want their private life to be private. Shame on BlogActive.
RWS 10/11/06
So if it is weeks before an election, the media should not report on this type of activity. If the seat is safely Republican, then Craig is the villian, not the reporter, and should be run out of the Republican party.
If you can't see the difference between a stranger outing someone and me encouraging someone to admit to themselves what they are, then I can't help you.
Sparkle - There is no help.
Why not attack Roll Call for publishing this "disgusting" and "appalling" story like you did when Mike Rodgers ran the same story about Craig in Union Station in D.C.?
Why should Craig be let off the hook then as it was neither "cheating or stealing" before the election, but now the exact same allegations are grounds for being run out of the Republican party?
This sounds disgusting at first, but I think he was setup. The Senator says he is not gay - why dont people believe him?
I see two different reactions to the same allegations by the same person. The first time it is alleged, the media and democrats are to blame and the sitting Senator should have his private life left alone.
The second time, the Senator is portrayed as a lying cheat who is a disgraced his party and his family.
Why the change?
publishing this "disgusting" and "appalling" story like you did when Mike Rodgers ran the same story about Craig in Union Station in D.C.?
When did I do that?
jandrew - Rogers made threats to out people, and was citing anonymous rumors as his "proof". He is a dirtbag.
Personally, I do not think Sen. Craig should resign. He was elected, and his constituents will have the opportunity to return him to office if they wish. Their call.
These are not the same allegations by the same people, unless Rogers' source was the policeman, in which case he should have identified the source.
JD:
I have no problem with your take on it, and agree with you most of the way.
It's when RWS attacks Rodgers holding Craig out to be a victim weeks before an election, but when the same allegation is made against Craig after the election by a different source she casts him out of the Republican Party, I start finding it hard to believe that either opinion is actually her own.
jandrew,
You are not that dense. You just want an argument and I can tell you now that I don't have time for silly arguments with you.
In the first case someon is accusing a man who obviously wants his sexuality to remain private or is not gay. In the second case he is doing something illegal and depraved, gets caught and should be thrown out.
Commenting by HaloScan
