If you're interested here's a legal critique of the indictment. (Not that I disagree with your points.)
A tort case of intentional infliction of emotional address should suffice, though I doubt the woman has much money. Perhaps a judgement against any assets she does have until the end of time would be a start. Harrassment as a crime, perhaps. But the computer stuff does seem like glory-seeking. Prosecutors like to get patted on the back for how they stretched a law to get at someone through the backdoor. The Al Capone approach.
SD: The Volokh post is interesting, measured and well reasoned. But I prefer to fly of the handle.
H: If I were Megan's parents I'd sue the pants off that bitch--if only to make her life a living hell.
I'd also recommend that we reinstate the pillory to handle cases like this.
Commenting by HaloScan
