I think there is a certain groinal Ken doll expectation among professional men -- I mean in the office worker world. I was horrified, for instance, one day recently when I saw a man in a light colored suit who clearly was wearing no underwear.
So much so that I could -- as we say in the South -- "see his religion"
You know, I saw the religion of a neighbor a long time ago and nicknamed him The FreeBaller.
Barbie has a lot more breast definition than Ken has penile definition. But then Barbie has no genitalia. Not that I recall precisely. Hmm..
"You just have to be proportionate. For women who are small busted, that may mean a little padding. For well-endowed women, that may mean a minimizer."
Ugh. I cannot believe that she is saying these words and serious about them. Because *men* view women better if they have a certain size, that means the women should change, rather than men getting over themselves?
Wow.
Much like how Carl Bernstein thinks a critique of how Hillary Clinton isn't physically pleasing to him is valid....
And, ck, proportionate to what is what I'm wondering....each other? my head?
Commenting by HaloScan
