Tell me about your mother....
I can't enlarge the type to see what others have written in response to another piece written here. I'm sure they were all brilliant writers.
I came to this site looking for "Left Fascism," and stayed because of the notice on Jung. If you can direct me further to his associations with the Nazis, if you have further information on fascist Irrationality and Naizism, on fascism and gnosticism, all things to do with Jung there, I'd like to put it up for my readers if you're willing.
The Left has betrayed its principles entirely, according to me, and I'm posting the degeneracy by showing where I can the history of the movers and shakers who are today icons of the Left but who arre historicially fascists, eg. Jung, Campbell, Heidegger, oh so many others.
And if I can make the print large enough to read I'll find out what your other readers have to say.
Oh fer cryin' out loud!
Thank you, Nat.
"The home of man is his wife." One has aspirations on a human scale and seeks to pass along gifts, the other lives in a tragic drama of conflict and aspires to death and destruction.
The devil's purpose is indeed the destruction of creation. What can one say but no? This is why I cannot accept pacifism as an absolute ideal.
No one can say that the negative ideas and purposes by which some men live their lives don't have more impact than all the natural disasters put together.
Well said, MOM.
One people asserts it's viablity with a committment to life.
The other seeks to kill.
It is that simple.
Hi there.
Saw your comment on Mango's blog and thought I'd come say hi and look around.
Interesting stuff here, I've added you to my blogroll.
You have good tase in blogs, WebKittyn- mango is first rate.
You compare the family of a murderer with the family of a Nobel Prize winner. The lesson you draw is the differences between "two peoples."
A more apt comparison would be to compare the murderer's family and the family of murderer, Baruch Goldstein who walked into the Cave of the Patriarchs in Hebron and opened fire, killing dozens of Muslims in prayer.
Then, compare the family of the Nobel Prize winner with, say, the family of Nobel prize winner for literature, Naguib Mahfouz.
Because the way you are setting up the comparison is illogical and in the tradition of inflammatory racist reasoning.
Well, my mistake. I have enlarged the type, with attendant problems of a whole new sort. My plea for direction or contribution is open, and so large now that I have to stand back to read it. There seems to be no middle ground here.
I don't see myself ever being in line for a Nobel prize, but I have to say that I'd get up on stage, say, "Thanks, but I refuse to accept an award associated, even indirectly, with Yassir Arafat." and walk off the podium, end of speech.
It'd be nice to see someone else with the cojones to drop that bombshell on them, I must say.
I finally got a key board that doesn't have sticky keys, and now that I can read the comments in a reasonable size I'm looking at this old post. How smart some of the comments are, and imaginative.
My offer still stands, that if anyone has opinions or direction to offer regarding Jung's Nazi sympathies, I'd like to find out, that being, of course, if there is any concern here for such things. Perhaps not, and that would be fine too. And yes, I'm also happy to get such clever comments as Nat posted above. I'm just way too easy.
Commenting by HaloScan
