Tell me about your mother....
You can quote as many blogs and religious texts as you like, but I am sorry to say, there is still no evidence of any mullahs having any nuclear weapons.
Of course, you're right.
You'd rather wait for these people to have them before dealing with them.
Your stupidity is breathtaking.
How will we know when the Mullahs have them?
When they launch on us, that's when. GOD WILLED IT! GOD'S WILL! GOD'S WILL! GOD'S WILL!
Did anyone catch the Washington Times editorial about how the Iranian Mullahs have their own End Time Prophecy cult going? And how starting a nuclear war will usher in the Return of the Twelfth Imam, the end of the world, and the eternal triumph of Islam?
Of course I'm right. You made an assertion with zero evidence to back it up. I'm not sure how it makes me stupid to point that out.
If you feel that we should take over Iran BEFORE they have a nuclear weapon, then fine--but see, that's not what you said.
From what I can tell Isaac, you made a opposing assertion with zero evidence to back it up and some evidence to the contrary.
Besides which, "taking over Iran BEFORE they have a nuclear weapon" is a thought, not a feeling.
As my spouse would say, you may be right, but you're only half right.
smm- don't waste your time. He's cluless.
smmtheory, how do you propose that I provide "evidence" that there is no evidence of something?
Isaac is right. We should WAIT till Iran has weapon.
Good we waited for Hitler, too.
I know Isaac. This is where you tell me you're Jewish, or your best friend is Jewish, your mother is Jewish, your father is Jewish, your girlriend is Jewish, your car is Jewish...
In fact, there are people smarter than you that believe Iran already HAS the bomb.
That said, even if they don't, we ought to wait until they DO have the bomb, to act.
Whoever says public schools work is an idiot.
My, you get touchy when someone calls you on an irresponsible assertion. Lookee, you even updated your post.
Enjoy your descent into the world of strawman-building, ad-hominem-ejaculating hackdom. Are you a big Sean Hannity fan, by any chance?
Actually Isaac, that wasn't your assertion. Your assertion was that the terrible turban-topped theocrats of terror that lead Iran are harmless. That's what you don't have evidence to support.
When did I assert that, sir?
Isaac- why are changing the subject? What is it your afraid of? Being called an idiot- is that it? Fear not- everyone who reads this blog already knows that!
So let me ask you again, Isaac- do you think we ought to wait for Iran to have a nuclear weapon? Or do you approve a regime openly committed to Israel's destruction and the slaughter of Jews?
THINK before you answer, Isaac- THINK.
You can do that, Isaac- really, you can.
Isaac, it occurs to me that you might have been one of the 9/11 dancers.
Please, do tell
Now you're accusing me of changing the subject, and telling me you're asking something of me AGAIN when you never asked me in the first place.
Do you have any idea how silly you are making yourself look? Learn to read, people.
To answer your question, no, I do not approve of the Iranian regime, nor do I think we should be caught in the position of Iran having a nuclear weapon. However, you have provided zero credible evidence that Iran is anywhere close to having a nuclear weapon. Blog entries, religious mythology, and quotes from people you admit are crazy don't cut it. Therefore, I do not support any invasion of Iran at this time until credible evidence is presented that shows they are a threat.
Why didn't YOU answer MY question? Are you a big Sean Hannity fan? You argue like he does, but you're not as good at it.
You really are irrelevant and what you say is irrelevant. There is no question (not even by the IAEA- notwithstanding they arern't as smart as you) that Iran is capable of building a nuclear weapon- and there is also no question that Iran sought, bought and paid for plans to build a nuclear weapon from Khan in Pakistan.
They also sought, bought and paid for missile technology needed to deliver nuclear payloads.
Yup, they spent all that money NOT to build a bomb.
In the end, you may refer to me as Sean Hannity. I shall refer to you as Barbra Streisand.
Still, you're entertaining. We'll keep you around. You are an amusing idiot.
You are hereby annointed the SC&A Court Jester.
What people like Isaac don't realize is that when we see the Iranian mushroom cloud, whether over Tel Aviv, Washington or New York, perhaps Riyadh, it will almost certainly mean the end of the ancient line of Persia in very short order. These dolts do not realize that the entire purpose of our invasion of Iraq was to make it unnecessary to annihilate our enemies; once Iran uses a nuke, as they have maintained they will, we will have no choice but to cauterize them.
The issue really isn't about nuclear weapons or President Ahamdinejad- that's just a pretext used by Bush to sell his war on Iran.
Here are the known facts about Iran's nuclear program:
1- Iran has a legitimate economic case for nuclear power, which the US (including some of the members of the current Bush administration) encouraged. (see http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp...-
2005Mar26.html and http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Mid.../GH24Ak02.html)
2- Iran's enrichment program was not clandestine, and was widely reported in the nuclear industry literature & on Iranian radio. Iran's deals with countries like CHina to make the necessary plants had been reported to the IAEA, and the IAEA had even visited Iran's uranium mines in 1992. (See Le
Monde Diplomatique: "Iran Needs Nuclear Energy, Not Weapons" November 2005 http://72.14.207.104/search?q=ca.../2005/11/
02iran )
3- While there were undeclared facilities in Iran, the IAEA reported in Nov 2003 that "to date, there is no evidence that the previously undeclared nuclear material and activities referred to above were related to a nuclear weapons program." In comparison to the US accusations on Iran, other countries which HAD actually conducted secret nuclear weapons experiments -- such as Egypt and S. Korea -- have been given a free pass.
4- In Nov 2004, the IAEA reported that "all the declared nuclear material in Iran has been accounted for, and therefore such material is not diverted to prohibited activities."
5- In Jan 2006, the IAEA reported that "Iran has continued to facilitate access under its Safeguards Agreement as requested by the Agency . . . including by providing in a timely manner the requisite declarations and access to locations."
6- Repeated offers of compromise by Iran that would have addressed the risk of proliferation of nukes were simply dismissed without any consideration. Most recently, Iran's Jan 2006 offer to continue the suspension of enrichment for another 2 years of additional negotiations were summarily dismissed, and not even reported in the US press though it
was reported in the Iranian press (see
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Mid...t/
HB07Ak01.html )
7- The people of Iran are intensely proud of their country's nuclear achievements, regardless of their other political opinions, and also have historical grudges against foreign powers that tried to bully them. Read Kinzer's All the Shah's Men.
8-Ahmadinejad makes for a good boogey-monster but in fact IRan's nuclear program started long long before President Ahmadinejad was elected, and he has no
legal control over Iran's military or foreign policy. The US is just aggrandizing him to scare you.
Oh yeah, there's also a "magic laptop" which has literally fallen out of the blue sky, and conveniently provides all the evidence of a nuclear weapons program in Iran that no one else has found after 3 years of inspections.
antique caille machine slot antique caille machine slot antique caille machine slot. bonus online slot bonus online slot bonus online slot.
american equity express home loan american equity express home loan american equity express home loan. home loan phoenix arizona home loan phoenix arizona home loan phoenix arizona.
Commenting by HaloScan
