Read the commenting rules carefully because they will be enforced!
Politicians make the decision to make war. Generals fight the war. Once the fight begins, the politicians need to back off.
I completely agree Snooper.
Looks like I hit a "liberal nerve" in my last post.
http://www.haloscan.com/comments...76843631/
#74441
HEH.
They hate hearing the truth about themselves, don't they?
"Bottom Line, we are halfway to the September date for the actual full report and half of the benchmarks have been satisfactory and half have not."
A little basic math here:
8 out of 18 does not equal half.
Why do Loyal Bushies always have the need to stretch the Truth this way?
8 out of 18 satisfactory = 44% = F in my grade book
Now, all I wonder is, what are you going to say in September if it's still 8 out of 18?
I have no doubt our military can hold their 8 military benchmarks forever. Our military has never been the problem in Iraq.
Their Commander-in-Chief has been the problem since May 1, 2003.
Do you honestly believe the other 10 POLITICAL benchmarks will be met by September?
If not, do you have a plan B? Because I don't think the Commander-in-Chief does.
One again YOU misrepresent the facts Jan, 8 satisfactory, 8 not satisfactory, 2 mixed which brings both totals to 9 and 2 are too early to determine...
That is half and perhaps you should start using a calculator since you have just shown you cannot read NOR see the graph that was presented to help the "challenged"
.
WHAT?!!?
QUOTE:
"H-A-L-F THE BENCHMARKS HAVE BEEN S-A-T-I-S-F-A-C-T-O-R-Y."
TRUTH:
8 satisfactory benchmarks. Period.
TRUTH:
18 total benchmarks. Period.
Please explain how I have "misrepresented" the FACTS.
This is why we think you guys are just completely nuts!
You lie.
OK.
But then you friggin' turn around and LIE about LYING!
I thought President Bush done a good speech. Long over due I want him to go after congress, just like congress is going after Gen. Petraeus & our Troops.
Frankly, I'm tired of their d@mn whining, do they in congress really expect a war to be "nice"?
They should stick to the video war games. For congress only sees & hears what it wants to.
President Bush said it very clearly leave running the war to the Military & the President, but he knows it comes down to our Military.
And he was right polls don't run a war.
Now if congress could figure that out we'd get somewhere.
People like you LOVE to distort the truth. I stand by my last comment and Jan, you need a shrink, yanno?
Distractions and distortions do not work here, they simply show my readers how assinine and how low you trolls will go.
Amazing how you do not seem to understand what the words "too early to determine"mean Jan.
That means, cause you obviously cannot understand it, that it is "too early to tell" if they are meeting that benchmark or not.
http://bp2.blogger.com/_Xn_O-
mM2...RAPHIC.full.jpg
(Correction to my numbers, there are 8 satisfactory, 7 not satisfactory, one satisfactory and one not satisfactory in the mixed and 2 not able to be determined, which actually makes it MORE satisfactory than not satisfactory that have been met.... thanks.)
that the graph.....try actually READING IT.
Keep making an ass of yourself, I have a pool that is calling my name.
See ya.
Damn straight Cassie, I loved his words, right on target and he should have sounded like this for the ast 2 years.
Good going BUSH!!!!
Another analysis from http://www.nsnetwork.org/node/168
Benchmark Report Fact Check
By Ilan Goldenberg
The National Security Network reviewed the benchmarks labeled by the Bush Administration as "satisfactory." Unfortunately the facts show that this moniker is misleading. Some benchmarks claimed as "satisfactory" only demonstrate minimal progress, not achievement. Others have been achieved on the surface, but fail to accomplish the overall purpose of the specific measurement. A point-by-point analysis follows.
Benchmark (i)
--------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
Assessment: The Government of Iraq has made satisfactory progress toward forming a Constitutional Review Committee (CRC) and then completing the constitutional review.
Response: The committee reviewing the constitution has experienced numerous delays. Most of the highly contested issues have been put off. Even if the government managed to pass the constitution, there would still need to be a national referendum.
--------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
The initial version of the constitution drafted in 2005 was viewed as unfair by the Sunnis, who only accepted it after a clause was added to allow them to amend it later. The key issues regarding the constitution are: federalism, or the right of provinces to attain “regional” status with more power than one province alone, the future of a referendum on the status of the oil-rich city of Kirkuk, whether Iraq should be considered an Arab country, and the reduction of the power of the Prime Minister while granting more power to the President. The way the Constitution is currently structured, Sunnis are put at a significant disadvantage on all of these fronts. [NY Times, 6/13/2007. Iraq Slogger, 5/17/07]
The Constitutional Review Committee has been slow to show progress. The Committee was originally scheduled to complete its work by May 15. Instead, it delivered a draft that did not address many of the key issues, and tried to pass the responsibility off to the political leadership. The deadline has been extended multiple times because of a failure to come to an agreement. A new draft is due at the end of July. One of the leaders of the Committee, Sheik Humam Hamoudi, believes that it might take even longer stating, “We have not committed to doing it by September... Maybe the American Congress has made such a commitment, but we have not.” [Washington Post, 6/27/07. NY Times, 6/13/2007.]
Even if the Constitutional Committee came to an agreement on step one, actually getting the amendments passed would be extraordinarily complicated. The parliament must vote on the amendments after they make it out of committee. If they pass parliament, the amendments must then win a majority from the public in a nationwide referendum. As an additional hurdle, at least three of Iraq’s eighteen provinces would have to register two-thirds
continued:
approval. [Council on Foreign Relations, 05/15/07]
Benchmark (viii)
--------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
Assessment: The Government of Iraq has made satisfactory progress toward establishing supporting political, media, economic, and services committees in support of the Baghdad Security Plan.
Response: Establishing committees has had little impact on Baghdad’s population which still lacks access to many basic services like water and electricity.
--------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
In late May and early June, Baghdad suffered severe power and water shortages of up to 23 hours per day. Baghdad’s water pumping stations require electricity and currently, more than 8 of the 12 supply lines are down. With average highs topping 110˚F in July and August the situation has the potential to get even worse. Meanwhile, Baghdadis are forced to find their own water supply. Neighborhood co-ops are purchasing and running their own fuel-driven generators. Those who can afford to try and dig wells in their backyard, an expensive operation which also seriously affects the water table. [NSN Staff Interviews. Institute for War & Peace Reporting, 6/8/07]
Baghdad is still averaging only 5.6 hours of electricity per day. This number represents only 20% of prewar production levels. The Bush Administration’s Coalition Provisional Authority initially targeted 6,000 megawatts per day by June of 2004 and made the creation of a stable Iraqi electrical and water infrastructure a top priority. Iraq is still 40% below those levels. The average amount of electricity generated nationally in May (The last full month of reporting) was only 3,722 megawatts, a 6% drop-off from prewar levels. This, despite an effort to distribute electricity more equitably on a national level. [Brookings Institution, 7/9/07]
Not enough potable water exists in Iraq. According to the International Red Cross, “both the quantity and quality of drinking water in Iraq remain insufficient despite limited improvement…water is often contaminated, owing to the poor repair of sewage and water-supply networks and the discharge of untreated sewage into rivers, which are the main source of drinking water.” [Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction, 4/30/07]
We do our own independent analysis Winnie, we can read, we can reason and we can deduce, we don't depend on others to think for us.
continued:
Benchmark (ix)
--------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
Assessment: The Government of Iraq has made satisfactory progress toward providing three trained and ready Iraqi brigades to support Baghdad operations.
Response: According to military officials the three brigades that came to Baghdad were understaffed and poorly trained causing a major delay in Baghdad security operations.
--------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
The Baghdad Security Plan is failing to meet its security targets partly due to a lack of Iraqi Security Forces. As of June, three months after the start of the Baghdad Security Plan, American and Iraqi forces controlled less than one-third of the city’s neighborhoods, far short of the initial goal. Brig. Gen. Vincent K. Brooks said that while military planners had expected to make greater gains that have not been possible in large part because Iraqi police and army units ― which were expected to handle basic security tasks like manning checkpoints and conducting patrols ― have not provided all the forces promised, and in some cases have performed poorly. [NY Times, 6/4/07]
The number of available-for-duty security forces (including police) is only about one-half to two-thirds of the 330,000 Iraqis that is cited by the military. The discrepancy is due to the fact that many troops have gone AWOL, quit the military, or are on leave. [DOD, 6/07]
Benchmark (xiii)
--------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
Assessment: The Government of Iraq with substantial Coalition assistance has made satisfactory progress toward reducing sectarian violence but has shown unsatisfactory progress towards eliminating militia control of local security.
Response: Estimates of civilian casualties in Iraq remain roughly the same as they were when the surge began in February.
--------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
Sectarian violence has remained constant despite the “surge.” Although sectarian violence in Baghdad dropped in the first two months of the surge, civilian casualties nationwide rose and averaged more than 100 per day in June. Despite the early drop in sectarian killings, data from the Baghdad morgue gathered by The Brookings Institution shows the civilian casualties to be higher in June than when the surge began in February. [Washington Post, 6/13/07. Brookings Institution, 7/9/07. Department of Defense, 6/07]
Some of the ugliest instances of sectarian violence have occurred during the “surge”. In late March, a truck bomb in a Shi’a neighborhood killed 150 people. Shi’a controlled police units responded by systematically kidnapping and murdering 70 Sunnis. Just this past week, a suicide truck bombing in a remote village in northern Iraq claimed a death toll around 150, making it one of the deadliest single bombings, if
Susan writes, "We do our own independent analysis"
OK, I won't post the balance then. Seeing all the cross posting on your blog, I thought I'd do the same, but I will refrain.
I REPEAT:
We do our own independent analysis Winnie, we can read, we can reason and we can deduce, we don't depend on others to think for us.
Pool time,be be back later
Winnie, they say they can read, they say they can reason, they say they can deduce.
But they also say that if 8 benchmarks out of 18 benchmarks are rated "satisfactory" then that equals HALF of the total benchmarks that have been rated "satisfactory."
And then when I let them know that their math is a little skewed, they attack me for... ready? ... "distorting the truth"!
Would that be the "truth" that 8/18 = 1/2 ???!!!
L.M.F.A.O.!!!!!
Once again Jan, you do not seem to comprehend the meaning of "too early to be determined"... maybe you should invest in a DICTIONARY, or to make it easier for you, one of those little books that help you "deduce" the definitions of "words"
You distort and you are just pissed because your little troll liberal trick of distortion doesn't work here.
http://bp2.blogger.com/_Xn_O-
mM2...RAPHIC.full.jpg
Again, look at the graph. 8, thats EIGHT benchmarks are satisfactory....only 7 that SEVEN are not satisfactory, TWO are mixed with one being satisfactory and one NOT satisfactory and TWO are "too early to make a determination.
That means out of those that CAN be determined, 8 satisfactory/7 NOT satisfactory, what YOU have managed to do is show us that we have MORE that are satisfactory than are not.
Good job wondergirl.
Talking to you is like talking to a two year old, things have to be said VERY SLOWLY for you to grasp the meaning.
Maybe it is that "mixed" that is in the graph that seems to be sooooo confusing for you.
Understandable since we have already shown how SLOW in the head you are.
.
For those just getting here, welcome and as you can see, I am lucky I had a child and learned that the only way children learn is through repetition.
Jan is a perfect example of that.
Back to regularly scheduled programming.
Good grief Spree...when are the trolls going to learn 1) the media is controlled by the defeatists so there's not going to be any good news for them to see (I mean what do you expect when 87% of the journalists donate to the DNC?); 2) the current congress and it's lapdogs are invested in defeat and couldn't stand a good thing if it bit them on the ass; and 3) what is it with their total dependence and co-dependence on polls? Why don't they go to the milblogs and see it from the troops themselves?
Oh....wait...that would burst their little defeatist bubbles and they wouldn't be able to cry wolf anymore....
Beth, yanno, normally I would see sarcasm there but in reality, you are 100% right and the fact that they are too blind to even see it, too dishonest to acknowledge and too stupid to challenge it, says it all.
They call us intellectually dishonest...when they can't even comprehend the first facet of honesty in acknowledging bias and revel in being pablum-fed their opinions.
Remember the old bumper sticker, "Question Authority?" They don't even know how to do that anymore, not with any kind of integrity, reliance on polls to tell them what to think and a heavy dose of conspiracy theories...
Yeah, Elvis is running the war and the little gray men must be part of the army huh?
It IS kinda funny watching them though, like freaks at the circus show.
Beth... read this:
http://newsbusters.org/node/14050
Seems everyone BUT the liberals know about the media bias.
Diane Sawyers feelings were hurt...poor thing.
TOO Funny! I've noticed lately the "softballs" the media keeps throwing at the liberals while doing their dangdest to scr*w conservatives---fair and balanced my behind!
Down here, there's a particular news station, the ABC affiliate. They have a propensity for hiring people from my high school (one of those overachieving places). One night, the sportscaster (an alum) just couldn't contain himself--and got in trouble for showing his "bias" for his alma mater's success. It didn't work--too many of the journalists just couldn't stop their conservative views, patriotism, support of high school sports...lol...but then they all started getting fired. Interesting, that.
Yup, rooting for sports teams is a FIREABLE offense...hahahahahahah
Gotta try to eat, maybe it will make my stomach feel better. Be back soon.
Left wing liberals suffer from a host of maladies running from severe to extreme.
The three top ailments are;
1.) Severe Acquired Leftist Anencephalic Dementia, aka SALAD.
2.) Extreme schizophrenia.
3.) Cognitive dissonance.
There are also those that deserve honorable mention;
ADD, CRS, SJS for males of the moonbat species.
Why anybody would think they can educate, inform, or otherwise have coherent dialogue with these people is beyond my comprehension.
Now for you liberal lefties who may have trouble understanding the "big" words, you can, A.) look them up on the internet, B.) look them up in a good dictionary. Please allow me to suggest Websters New World College Dictionary, C.) ask and I will do my best to explain so that you can understand.
Any questions?
Solo! You forgot my favorite---Black's Law dictionary! LOL!
"Yeah, Elvis is running the war and the little gray men must be part of the army huh?
It IS kinda funny watching them though, like freaks at the circus show.
spree"
DAMMIT girl, you just STOLE my next posting for the AP!
You know if congress had half a brain they all could see what is going on, BUT this is not possible because most of them have ignored reading skills or for that matter people skills.
We all know that congress can't regulate a baseball team and all of a sudden they want to be Generals. They pass bills into law that they don't read.
They take more days off from "w o r k " than anyone else. And to top it all off they try to run a war without "equipment". Now how lame is that?
The media is crazy so I don't expect much from those dinbats.
And if anyone can answer this please do:
How can congress conduct a war without being there on the ground to see what is going on?
Guys, I think we stumbled onto some shows:
Congress
1. Sale of the Century
2. The Price is Right
3. Name That Job- after Name that Tune
4. Jeopardy
5. What's My Line
The media is differnt:
1. The dating game
2. Password
3. Family Fued
spree! I just got the official Loyal Bushie talking point!
Here it is:
"We met NEARLY half of all the benchmarks."
You MISSED a word, dittohead.
Cheers!
As I know for a fact that spree doesn't listen to talk radio, I'm going to go out on a limb here and guess she has no idea what a dittohead is.
Jan, do you sit around all day doing nothing but think of new and brilliant ways to show your ass?
She's just showing her desperation at not being able to think for herself, that's all, Hawk.
One good "mugging" for the night, though...my sister had turned traitorous democrat...and decided to start arguing politics with me tonight. Silly girl, never won a fight with me in her life.
While we were on the phone, she changed her designation on the computer back to republican. Something about the Michael Yon stories--that she admitted she'd never heard--got to her--and she wondered out loud why the media wasn't running with his stories.
Hmmm...good question. She didn't like the answer.
You know what they say--a conservative is a liberal that got mugged! One back to our side!
WHOOWAHHH
Outstanding 
I think that they get so wrapped up in wanting to feel good about themselves that they realize that there are SO MANY "causes" out there that they wind up miserable. Explains the yelling, name calling, snide remarks, and lies, methinks.
Generally, I think you're right. My sis, though, married into a 'crat family in texas, and well, let's just say violence ensues if she differs in her opinion and God forbid she should ever agree with me (her husband and I don't get along because I don't like lazy, live off their wives, wife-beating drug addicts for some reason).
He wasn't home tonight so we could talk freely--and she was able to get to the computer and erase her tracks before he knew a thing.
Talk about a brainwashing...can you imagine not being able to voice your opinion or you get beat?
Oh...wait...that's what's in store for us if we surrender...even more so for women before they stuff us in our burquas.
Sad, isn't it?
I'll be a dead sonofabitch before I live to see that happen. One thing that the taliban and al queda aren't counting on is the southern patriotic veterans, men like myself who enlisted in the military right out of high school, took our shooting skills into combat weapons training, and learned how to kill the enemy. We may be heavier, we may be older, we may be a little more rickety, and we may not meet the criteria for reenlistment and deployment, but by God southerners know how to fight a rebel war...
I can also relate about her being in a family of dem's. I'm the only republican in my family, my parents, my grandmother, are all democrats. My brother works for a liberal newspaper, and he leans even further left than the rest of the paper a great many times.
A shame he has to resort to physical violence to convince her of his "opinions," but then we're learning from the highest levels the true cowardice and nature of the left, methinks. No wonder the rank and file seem to follow suit.
No, btw, before you ask, my father is NOT a veteran. He missed being drafted during Nam, I'm not sure of the details, something to do with the way drafting was done being changed. I honestly, though, am surprised that I wasn't born in Canada, considering how vehemently they opposed MY enterance into military service. I can remember being told "I don't understand why you would do this of your own free will. When I was your age, we were planning our escapes to Canada so we didn't have to go in."
Now that I've depressed myself with memories of things best left forgotten, I think I'm going to turn in...heh.
I haven't been happy with Bush on immigration and a few other things, but you have to give him credit here. He is standing firm.
The Democrats don't have any choice but to push for pullout. That's what they were elected for and their base is very upset with them.
I'll be a dead sonofabitch before I live to see that happen. One thing that the taliban and al queda aren't counting on is the southern patriotic veterans, men like myself who enlisted in the military right out of high school, took our shooting skills into combat weapons training, and learned how to kill the enemy. We may be heavier, we may be older, we may be a little more rickety, and we may not meet the criteria for reenlistment and deployment, but by God southerners know how to fight a rebel war...
Hawk | Homepage | 07.13.07 - 12:08 am | #
HOOAH! DAMN SKIPPY!!
LOCK AND LOAD.
RUCK UP.
WATCH SIX.
KEEP FIVE.
HOOAH?
Snooper what are you still doing up? Dang, I swear you keep worse hours than I do!
I was late getting in to trounce a troll
Winston The Whiner does nothing but whine.
IT has no brain of ITS own.
Wow, It sounds like they have achieved more in the few months allotted to them then our government has in many months. This from a government in place for a few short years and we, who have had a working government in place for over 200, can only come up with renaming post offices. I don't think our government has a lot of room to talk about what they have or have not achieved. Crimminy we can't even get a fence built!
"Southerners know how to fight a rebel war."
Hawk, a dose of reality:
Southerners lost the rebel war.
WEll Now.. My cat just drug in a SHREW.. Oh no! It is Winston the troll.. How about that folks... the slime left its hole and got zapped!!!
But seriously.. How about that Namcy eh?? Crowing about defeat... I suppose that in the drug induced lunatic vernatcular she'll call it patriotism...
PS Have you all seen Maxine Waters " off the farm" proposition to have all future Govenment documents published in many languages??? And here I was thinking that we had ONE official language all along.. Guess that Ebonics might be her only way to communicate...
The South lost the war due to lack of resources, Jan, not due to lack of ability.
We have a saying down here, "Lee surrendered, I didn't."
Study your history, something OTHER than revisionist leftist inclusionist history that paints the war as being over nothing more than slavery.
And HAVE a nice day...
And, to add to Hawk's comment, Jan...study which region of the country has spilled the most blood FOR this country--it's the SOUTH and all the good ole boys and girls who KNOW WHAT PATRIOTISM IS, AREN'T AFRAID OF IT OR TO SHOW IT, AND ARE WILLING TO FIGHT AND DIE FOR OUR COUNTRY...
Maybe you should thank them for the freedom THEY'VE given you with THEIR lives to spew your nonsense and garbage
Go Beth!!! Stop holding back, tells us how you REALLY feel!
HOOAH!!
Did y'all see the latest OBL video?
LOL, was just checking it out via your site as I saw this comment.
We have NOTHING to worry about, do we?
Spree, I just saw your comment about not holding back...lol...i didn't hold back at snoop's troll trouncing here: http://www.haloscan.com/comments...983144/?
a=43078
And all you Southerners, what about me? I can't believe you all are arguing over who's the best.
At one time Pennsylvania had the most especially ARMY you see we have a whole lot of Veterans here.
I happen to belive they are all the best. And Jan cool it.
To one very special Veteran in memory- I LOVE YOU BABE.
Ok, Cassie, here's the deal. We'll be happy to ADOPT you as a Southerner, but you have to do a few things first to prove your worthiness of Confederate Nationalism.
1. Learn to use the word "ya'll" instead of "you all, you guys," or any other plurals of "you"
2. Know the definition of the word "nekkid." Most people from across the Mason/Dixon line are clueless to the difference between naked, as they say up there for wearing no clothing, and nekkid, which is a term we use in the south for "you ain't got no clothes on, and you're up to something."
3. If you DON'T have a beagle, a coon hound, or a laborador retriever, you need to make arrangements to get one, preferably a small puppy, soon.
4. All of the above can be covered in what we call "the unwritten fourth rule," which I am including here for your benefit. Know the difference between Southern and Redneck, because there IS a difference, and while one can BE both, it does not HAVE to be the case.
Enjoy, and let me know when to notify the board that you are ready for adoption
Me Hawk--Adopt me! I was born in Oklahoma and live in Arizona now, but dang it, I use y'all ALL the time, know what nekkid means--just have to get a dog (live in an apartment--however...my daughter adopted a retriever puppy and she lives in the house I bought--does that count?)
Cassy, Pennsylvania is splendid...and I know you miss your veteran so much. I'm going off all the posts about the confederacy times on forward--people always put down the confederacy as racist when it's not--there's a rich history behind it. Besides, for all my "genteel airs" I'd much rather be screaming a rebel yell than sipping tea! LOL!
Consider yourself adopted already...I adopted you after our first set of communications..LOL
The committee has spoken, you're in
Jack Daniels, anyone?
Woohoo! I'll take some of that there Jack!
I am a Southern Redneck Texican. And that's the best there is.
You know I love ya'll, better now?
And I know the diff btwn rebel & redneck, a redneck likes shiny things, etc.
My belief is that both & all of them were great guys, sorry can't give up my guys. So I guess you must adopt Miss Beth. She's a darlin anyway.
And I'll have a Jack Daniels too if you don't mind.
I accept the adoption ONLY if you adopt Miss Beth.
One thing please use english, can't take much more of spanish from raoul.
Will ya'll hold it against me for not being ablle to eat hot foods?
I can't even eat hot peppers, stomack has a fit.
Don't forget my Jack Daniels.......
Thank ya'll love you.
I hate spicy food Cassie, you fit right in, no worries.
Our only true requirement is that we support the troops the way THEY ask us to, not the way the liberals claim to by ignoring everything our fine soldiers say.
Patriots forever.
Will this do:
A Founding Spounser of the US Army Museum
The USO
NAUS
Soldiers Angels
Wounded Warrior Project
I could go on but I think you get the picture.
There are two things that I am passionate about
1. Our Troops
2. Our Veterans
Don't forget to vote for the WWP at ReZoom every day until August.
They will get a lot of much needed money.
Thank you.
Ack... whats the URL and vote I will?
Here it is Hawk: http://rezoom.com/ You have to join as a member, but it's well worth it!
Will join the second I finish this post I am working on.
Joined and voted!!!!!
Ok, cassie, that works, you're in. I'll take the jalapeno's when you get them, just pass'em my way and enjoy your Jack
LOL.
Many Thanks to ya'll. Listen, I know you have to log in and all. I put it in my favorites. Our Wounded need this.
And thanks for helping, love you all.
Oh Hawk this may come as a shock to you BUT YES you can have them I'll take the Jack Daniels. LOL
Also love SoCo.
Hush, raoul will think I'm a drunk.
Actually I'm not, at certain times of the year I have have some.
Cassie, thank YOU for bringing that site to our attention and I will be voting every day.
cassy...raoul is a Jihadi troll...IT admitted to it. Who cares what IT thinks?
Thank you for taking the time to vote for the WWP, Spree anytime.
Snoop, yes I know what it is. You should see what he's doing over at Pastor Ed's blog.
There is no shame to this nutb@ll.
He's saying things that make me ill about our Troops. About President Bush, Pat Tilman's death.
Yea and us.
Like I care what he thinks. I can't tell if the moron is a dope or on dope.
My pleasure Cassie, and I will go vote every day.
Thanks Spree. You don't need to be a member of it.
All you need to do is sign in and they will ask for a
Username
password
Cassie
I happily joined, didn't take long and it is a movement I am proud to now be a member of, thanks to you letting me know about it...weeeeeeeeeeeeee
I just hope the WWP win. It's well worth the money for our Wounded Warriors.
We just need to keep reminding people to vote every day.
I will do my best.
Commenting by HaloScan
