Read the commenting rules carefully because they will be enforced!
Hillary will not be subject to much scrutiny from her supporters as to why she is supporting Obama now after having told us all how inexperienced he was. When you consider the fact that we are talking about people who are not taken aback in the least by boldface lies such as those of sniper fire in Bosnia, it is easy to see how it will all make sense to them that she supports him now.
I strongly supported Hillary because of her superior intelligence, reputation for hard-word, well thought-out proposals, commitment to public service and established record. But MY SUPPORT FOR HILLARY DOES NOT MEAN SHE CONTROLS MY VOTE. Only I control my vote and, no matter what Hillary or anyone else says, I am not voting for someone who is an untrustworthy, anti-Semitic, racist, snake oil salesman. Nobama for me.
I am a strong supporter of Hillary. She had to face the world and know everyone was judging her when Bil cheated, but that showed her strength. She chose what she wanted, not what others wanted in HER life. Poitically she is awesome, and Obama is a joke, he is an underqualified man leaping over a more qualified woman for a job that she earned, 18 million people said so, and he counts uncommitted votes as his? Sketchy!!All I have to say is "RAIN MCCAIN!!" No Obama vote here not in my house!!
Are you all nuts? How can you vote for a candidate that Hilliary Clinton opposed? You were nothing but "fake followers!" "SIMPLE" as that. Jinny Lee
What is true?
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=YR...h?
v=YRCRHBNxgdQ
I am another democrat who quit the Dem Party and I am now a registered Independent. I will not vote for Obama period and I am planning to vote for McCain instead. I believe McCain is someone who you might disagree with on some issues but he is a straight shooter and a tested veteran. Moreover, I am convinced that he is more sensitive about issues affecting the Latinos.
I lost all respect and loyalty for the Democratic Party after what they did to the voters of FL and MI on May 31, 2008. The DNC betrayed the majority of Democratic voters and with the help of the media help Obama steal this nomination, just like 2000 when the candidate who won the popular vote lost the election. However, in 2000 it was the GOP with the help of the Supreme Court who took that election from us. This time it was the Party we supported and were loyal to who stabbed us in te back.
Join McCain or vote for the Green Party instead of Obama.
I definitely can't wait for November to vote for Obama. The republican failures will be history.
One more thing. I sure hope Obama makes lobbyists and special interest groups on the brink of extinction.
Here's a clue Esteban and everyone else parrotting about 2000---the popular vote was BUSH's not gores. PERIOD. It was gore and the dems tearing things apart then, and doing it now. It was gore ordering the Fl. Sec. of State to commit a felony when it was shown--repeatedly--he didn't have the votes. it was gore who insisted on the SC.
Get over that talking point, go find the facts and find some reality. it's not the GOP in 2000, 2004 or 2008---it's the dems then and the dems now. learn the reality and accept it.
I would have voted for Hillary Clinton, but I can't; I am not American. My husband and I are Clinton supporters; he is European and I am Asian. I need to let out my frustration and disappointment and share my opinions on this issue.
I have been watching CNN, The Situation Room, AC 360... religiously the past weeks. It is not easy with the time differences...
Except for Anderson Cooper (who is first class and very objective), I think the American media has been extremely biased against Hillary, while favouring Obama. It attacked her relentlessly no matter what she did or said. The worst culprit must surely be Gloria Borger in "The Situation Room". At times, I wished someone would lock her up and throw away the key.
What is wrong with America (the remaining Democrats minus the 18 millions)? Why do you not see something that outsiders can see so clearly? It seems to me that Obama is all sleek talk, has not enough experience, even gave up his own church, and changed tack to use the domestic issues that Hillary had been championing in her campaign in an attempt to win over her core women and blue-collar voters. It seems to me that he will do anything just to achieve his objective, which I feel is to make history and be the first black American president. That is, in my opinion, the only promised "change" you can expect from him. So what ever happened to talking to Iran? He cannot side both - it is either Iran or Israel. To try and be a friend to both is an illusion.
Hillary has nothing to prove - she has been at the White House for 8 years and she knows the workings. She knows it is a very tough job, she has been there (or close to it), and yet she is willing. Why did America not give her a chance? You would have gotten two presidents for the price of one! America is supposed to be the leader of the world, yet you cannot even transcend that conservatism to let the woman who deserves it be the commander-in-chief. Britain had Margaret Thatcher, Germany has Angela Merkel, even third world countries such as Myanmar has Aung Sung Su Kyi, and Pakistan had Benazir Bhutto. I don't get it. Why not America?
Obama should endorse Hillary as his running mate, or Democrats will not have a chance.
If I were American, I would have done what a lot of you are doing - switched to the McCain camp. At least he has a track record, honesty and integrity. I thought he was brilliant standing firm and saying "by the way, I will never give up in Iraq, never".
Hillary, I do not blame you for endorsing Obama. It was what the party and the media expected of you. Just like Princess Diana was the people's princess, to me - you are the people's president. God bless America!
Obama, or I should say Axelrod, ran a very clever campaign. He was trolling for delegates from the very beginning knowing Clinton would not spend her resources in Red States that would never go Blue if God himself was running on the Democratic ticket. I congratulate him on winning the nomination in such a slick way. My only problem is I firmly believe he is incapable
of being leader of the free world. He lacks experience. His speeches have been like high school pep rallies, inspiring words without any real substance. He has made no real commitments and offered even fewer solutions.
As a Hillary supporter I just cannot bring myself to support Obama or McCain. The whole thing was just far to offensive to forgive the DNC, Obama and his nasty supporters, MSNBC, CNN, and other so called news networks. We lost the only candidate that was worth voting for as far as I am concerned.
I cannot forgive Obama and his nasty supporters, the DNC, MSNBC, CNN and other so-called news outlets, for the way they treated Hillary Clinton during her campaign. As a life long Democrat, I will sit this one out. They did enough damage for my decision to hold well into November!
I think that Hillary should quit the back stabbing Democratic Party and run Independent. That, other that being the VP, would give me a reason to vote Democratic. I fully expected the Media to try and sidetrack her campaign, cowards, kniving back stabbers. What about all those years spent championing Black causes? Some major back stabbing too. I can't remember such betrayal by people of a political party, her own. If Obama survives being turned into hamburger by the Republicans and makes it, his Black Skin is not going to save his sorry ass once he starts to screw up. He clearly has no experience. God help us! I will be leaving the Democratic Party to be an Independent. Republicans sure as Hell don't represent me and Democrats have shown their treacherous nature. I think I'll write in my little dog for president. He has more experience than this Obama guy.
Here's a question that may have not occurred:
What do you all think the president DOES?
Because it feels like we're taking direct executive power a little bit too much for granted. Now, if we were voting for KING, yes! Experienced warrior!
But honestly now, there exists more than two mantras besides "Obama is a racist" and "Hillary is a ho", and there exists an essential understanding of the role of President that might elucidate who, and what, we're really voting for.
One might also point out that a vote for McCain, no matter how many puns are made, is a slap in the face to Hillary. Such a move requires a profoundly unsettling political chameleonism that is (or should be!) insulting to any citizen who claims to have principles. While you should vote for whomever you please, don't be irresponsible and childish, as if one could describe the Hillary-McCain dynamic as "they may not have agreed on everything". They may not have!
I have always voted democratic. This year for the first time in the 22 years I have been a registered voter, I will cast my vote for a McCain. I think he is the better of the two evils. I don't prefer either one, but I don't think Obama has any experience and is far to libral even for this democrat.
Finally there is some press about the huge contingent of loyal Clinton supporters. We are allready hearing about how young Obama supporters will throw tantrums if he doesn't win. PLEASE. These people have nothing to risk at his inexperience. The rest of us have lives and resposibilities. The USA is disliked by the world and we need someone with experience and judjment to navigate. The Obama's (both) arrogance and self aggrandizing do not play as qualifications to two thirds of voters. Sorry, but all the people who will ever vote for Obama already have.
Thanks to all of you for your comments.
Those that say they are voting for John McCain due to Obama's inexperience, associations, lies or for whatever reason.....welcome and thank you for putting country above party.
Sanchia, welcome, feel free to vent anytime!
To all the Hillary supporters refusing to vote for Obama. It is rediculious the fact that Hillary supporters "suppossedly democrats" are so against Obama when his & Hillary's platform for the country are more alike than different. Then they blame Obama for how the media treated Hillary. Excuse me, since when did Obama own the news media? Whenever I listened to the news media (Fox, MSNBC, CNN) they were blasting Obama for something or another. CNN seemed to be kinder to Obama than the others. Hillary continued to blast Obama throughout her campaign, so what's the problem. I am a female but am I supposed to say "Poor Hillary" - Obama was kind to Hillary considering her reciprocation to him. So let's be real!!! What is the real issue here? You say that it's because Obama doesn't have enough experience. Well, let's look at that statement. How much experience should one have? 5 years, 10 years, 20 years. The past presidents had experience and look at the shape of our country. It's not about experience, One's experience doesn't necessarily give an individual entitlement or make that person ready!!! I keep reading all this mess about Obama (rumors circulating on the email - scare tactics) If all that is true then how did he make it to the Senate. Surely, our own administration would have already investigated anyone elected to such a pretigious platform. Give me a break!!! And since when did the Clintons become so upright and honest and free of skeletons. Yet Obama did not once capitalize on that. And he could have. Again, I ask what is this really about? If Hillary supporters are really democrats and really serious about their political future, than they would not be acting as if they were a "cult!!!" So, again, I ask what is this really about?
I personal know about 12 voters in Texas who voted for Clinton who are now going to vote for McCain, four in Ohio and one in St. Louis, and I don't know a lot of people. Who in this U.S.A. with any intelligence would trust Obama to be our commander n chief? People, think, think, and read, read, read, and think again. Don't be fooled by this man.
A website owned by MSNBC that really shows extreme bias against Hillary is Newsvine at www.newsvine.com
At this sight the extreme left truly has a strangle hold on honest news.
The comments supporting Obama run 90 percent. Add your voice in opposition to what the democratic party did to Hillary.
"Mature" White Women, please stop playing the scorned victim role. EVERY SINGLE president has looked like your brother, father, husband or son. Can you come out off Wisteria Lane for 1 second to see how important this might be for my young son of color to see that he too can become president? Had the DNC given Clinton every single delegate from MI and FL she still was not going to surpass BO in the del count. If you want to be mad then channel your negative, abrasive, condescending energy into changing the way that the democratic nominee is elected. Personally, I would like to see the popular vote count for something. People of color will not die if another white man, mccain, is elected president. Actually, that's what we expect the glorious, color blind people of this county to do, so your revenge is moot. Finally, no more threats. Vote for McCain in Nov without all the anger and be proud of the choices that you make because your daughters are watching you and you'll have to explain your choices. I'm sorry that you are so hurt and i empathize. I even understand your being mad and wanting to get revenge. I will NEVER understand many of you viciously going out of your way to "take Obama down". That kind of thinking takes a malicious and unforgiving heart and that makes me feel pity for you. Life is too short.
As a Clinton supporter I certainly share the frustration a lot of democrats are feeling. But to cross the line and vote for McCain? Abandoning so many vital democratic positions in the process? Have we forgotten how close Bush and McCain have been--and remain--on so many important issues? Have we forgotten about the war?
There's all that to consider. But there's ANOTHER issue that no one seems to be paying attention to. One that's deserving of VERY close attention. That's the one jokingly referred to as John McCain's ANGER MANAGEMENT PROBLEM.
McCain has had a lifelong tendency toward sudden explosive anger. Get on Google. Do a search, using a combination of "McCain" and "anger". Choose the most reliable sources you find--some of which will be John's own colleagues--and READ. Then ask yourself: How does John McCain's temperment match with the job description of President of the United States?
Remember: The President is the person who has their finger on the button of our nuclear arsenal. The President is the person who gets a call and decides on the spot what to do with poised, first response military forces. At a word he can launch a bomber.
With McCain, we're not talking about a slight proneness toward the occasional angry word. We're talking about bug-eyed, flushed-faced, give-'em-the-finger fury, often entirely out of proportion to the thing that provokes it. He's been that way for years.
Consider also: When quickness to anger has been a long-term tendency with a male, it ONLY GETS WORSE WITH ADVNCING AGE. The angry responses become more exaggerated, more frequent, and are more easily provoked, even by trivial things. Sorry guys, but it's true. Anyone who has known an aging male with such tendencies can tell you. The ladies certainly know, because all too often they're the ones who have to deal with it.
Don't get me wrong here. I'm a Vietnam vet. I LIKE John McCain. He's been a good Senator. BUT, liking him and thinking he's a safe bet as President are two entirely different things.
I simply won't vote to put a guy prone to road rage in the national drivers seat. Period.
I don't want to worry about John McCain "going ballistic" as having a terrifyingly serious double meaning.
McCain and Obama want to change the bottom-line effects of the tax code. Here's a dollars-and-cents breakdown of what their plans could mean for you.
Black people didn't vote for Bill Clinton because of his color, but black people will vote for Obama because he is black. This is racist. Fellow Hillary supporters, please don't vote for Obama. Obama and his supporters totally disrespected (and still disrespect) Senator Clinton and us Clinton supporters. The DNC, only cares about half of the democrats in their party, so why let them con you into putting the DNC above the country.
Hillary holdouts are seriously deranged. You dont give a **** about America, all you care about is getting your way. No matter who won the primary you should be voting for the democrat... The election was only stolen in your rotten little paranoid fantasies. You are a very vocal minority, and Im glad you are leaving the party. We will lose in November because you want to act like whiny little brats.
Debates over the internet are a joke, any debate in real life you would lose. Obama won more delegates.. period. You wanted to reinstate votes for Hillary in elections that werent sanctioned by the democratic party because they broke the rules. But not only that you wanted to give every single delegate from MI to hillary even though Obama was not even on the ballot. Both candidates agreed beforehand that they wouldnt campaign in those states and the election wouldnt count. But once it was obvious Hillary was losing she wanted to count those delegates.
*censored*
Throw your tantrum and when we lose in November you can claim your hollow victory. It's much more important to spite Obama supporters than what is best for the country right? You make me ashamed to be a Democrat, you are such petty nasty people. Please leave the party and dont come back....
How's that for the Unity pony.
Edited By Siteowner
Derick.... I have never voted for anything BUT a democrat... say what you want but I wont vote for Obama no way...I'll be happy to leave the Democratic party... And when I leave I'll be sure to not only vote for McCain but work for his campaign and contribute money.... Here is a news flash...there are alot out there like me..and readng posts like yours makes me more determined not to vote for Obama... Your no different than the what happened in 2000"Florida"... rules are more important than the voters. well now u have your OBAMA live with him....
BREAKING NEWS: Hillary Clinton has thrown her support to Obama. She is asking all her supporters to vote for Obama. She is voting for Obama herself.
MORE BREAKING NEWS: John McCain voted with Bush 95% of the time in 2007 and 100% of the time so far in 2008.
BREAKING NEWS: John McCain has voted against bills that would insure equal pay for women.
MORE BREAKING NEWS: John McCain's strong suit is foreign policy, but he has often confused Sunnis and Shiites. He often forgets which group Iran has ties with.
MORE BREAKING NEWS: John McCain has stated publicly that he doesn't know much about economics.
SHOCKING, SHOCKING NEWS: Obama is not a Muslim. And he took his oath of office on the Bible. He even had the audacity to stand before the Senate with his hand on his heart and recited the Pledge of Allegiance.
AMAZING NEWS: Obama has almost exactly the same amount and type of experience Abraham Lincoln had when he was first inaugurated.
This letter will be run in a full page ad on a Sunday.
To donate to this ad, scroll to the bottom and click on that link
==================================================
=====================
WE OPPOSE YOUR SELECTED NOMINEE
TO THE LEADERS OF THE FAILED DEMOCRATIC PARTY:
Know that Barack Obama, the candidate that YOU selected to be the Democratic Party's nominee to run for president of the United States in 2008, will have to win the election in November with the votes of those YOU made into half-persons in Michigan and Florida.
Know that the candidate that YOU selected will have to win with the votes of the people in states like West Virginia and Kentucky, people he completely ignored during the nomination process.
AND KNOW THAT YOUR SELECTED NOMINEE WILL HAVE TO WIN THE ELECTION IN NOVEMBER WITHOUT THE VOTES OF MILLIONS OF LOYAL DEMOCRATS AND INDEPENDENTS WHO WILL NOT VOTE FOR ANY CANDIDATE WHO WAS SELECTED, NOT ELECTED.
You may choose to believe that we are “FEW,” and you may try to convince the public that we are a “SMALL” group of sore losers and bitter women. We heard you say publicly that we will fall in line in November and that we will vote for a Democrat when we look at the issues.
Well, you are wrong.
We are not few. We will not validate your corruption of the party’s nomination process. We will not fall in line. And we will not vote for Barack Obama, the candidate that you have selected as our party’s nominee through deals made in smoke-filled back rooms.
We are angry.
We are angry because you failed to uphold our party’s democratic principles. We are angry because you did not ensure that all candidates received fair treatment during the nomination process. We are angry because you stood by and said nothing while sexist, degrading and insulting remarks were made again and again to Senator Clinton and about her. And we are angry because, near the end of the process, you acted directly to undermine our system for electing our nominees by allowing 30 members of a committee to replace THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE with their own flawed judgment and then to STEAL four Michigan delegates that one candidate had earned and give them to the candidate that you had selected.
Indeed, just for running for our party’s nomination, you blamed one candidate--Hillary Clinton--for dividing the party and you tried to force her to drop out of the race by saying publicly that she was only in it to hurt Obama's chances of winning in November and by trying to tell the party’s automatic delegates publicly how they had to vote.
By your actions, you have revealed that you have worked not only to undermine Hillary Clinton’s candidacy, but to undermine our core democratic principles. And so we will work hard to make sure that you will soon no longer be able to call yourselves leaders of the Democratic Party.
In November, we will vote for John McCain and we will vote against every leader of the failed Democratic Party who participated in the corruption of the 2008 nomination process.
Between now and November, we will work hard to make as many Americans as possible join us in rejecting you and the nominee that YOU selected.
TO ANY DEMOCRAT, INDEPENDENT OR REPUBLICAN WHO SUPPORTS OR WANTS TO SUPPORT HILLARY CLINTON, PLEASE COME AND JOIN US AT: www.hcsfjm.com.
This Ad Is Paid For By Members Of The Clinton Supporters PAC
Supporting John McCain for President
Caren Hale, Treasurer, PO Box 147, Wellington, TX 79095
Centuries of pounding racism in its many ways and forms, it can not easily be overcome. Some of us are extremely conscious and/or unconscious racist regardless of the color of skin we have. Just the same, some voters consciously or/and unconsciously have chosen a candidate based in their skin color. It is clear that such organizations like the so called PUMA is one quick solution to hide their real motives to spend time and energy to justify their existence to themselves. Their common prejudices make them spread much poison and bad will for more people to suffer and for our reality to become worse. One can easily perceive their familiar anger when they talk. This group is like the ultimate option for them to hide behind. They cannot control themselves from their inner racist feelings of anger and the like.
In this good country, they are the minority and the troublemakers. This group found senator Clinton as a perfect scape and another mean to "feel more comfortable" with themselves. A few of them found also senator John Edwards as an excuse for these unspeakable purpose. Knowing him, I am sure he would not care much about their support because it was not real, but a masquerade for this group that have no real opinion, no integrity , no good will nor good judgment for this country. Their minds are polluted. Their nature is destructive and troubling. They are incapable to see real unity; much less understand the big picture of anything. They have a very fragmented view of their reality. They feed each other finding a common cause and purpose to fight blindly regardless of the consequences. They are incapable to reason maturely.
They live in a balloon. Some can be nice people, but can not ever be trusted. They are unpatriotic and live under many prejudices that justify their existence. They faithfully follow the philosophy of 'divide and conquer' and spend their lives blaming others for their misfortunes, but cannot see those who directly affect their life. They do not care about the well-being of this country at all. They have a constant chip on their shoulder as they also are incapable to understand it. They will remain blind and deaf controlled by their prejudices. Hopefully, they are the only ones that can educate and inform themselves and possibly change to finally free themselves from the terrible weight they have been carrying most of their lives. Senator Clinton should denounce them and reject their insincere support. We can only pray, feel sorry for them, and hope they will see their reality with different eyes.
For those Hillary backers who want to vote for McCain, especially women:
Do you seriously think McCain cares about you or about the women's issues that Hillary Clinton stands for?
I am an Obama supporter myself, but if she had won instead, I would have sucked it up and voted for her, because so much is at stake--and that is bigger than either her or Obama. Just keep in mind that John McCain showed his true colors when Senator Clinton was the first lady and Chelsea Clinton was a teenager.
He actually made the remark "Why is Chelsea Clinton so ugly? Because Janet Reno is her father."
Now, you keep talking about how Obama disrespected her during the nomination process , but was he the one who went to Richard Mellon Scaife and bad-mouthed her? No!!
She got really ugly during the campaign, and it turned off a lot of us who previously supported her.
Was he the one who made derogatory remarks about her child? No!!
I would like to see a woman get the presidency one day, but the nomination process is over, and we have to move on. I empathize with you to a certain extent, because you have invested so much in her campaign.
I also understand that she is a bit more experienced than Obama, but it would be cutting off your noses to spite your faces to vote for someone who cares so little about the issues you claim to value.
And you know what? When push comes to shove it's MCCAIN who pays his women staffers MORE than he pays his male staffers and gives them the full rights Stinky doesn't. If you truly gave a rat's ass about issues, you would have found this out for yourself. However, you don't give a shit about issues, you just want to propagandize.
Why don't you get the real facts and get off your propaganda? Frankly, I think MO is a bitchy faced ho who's puss is so sour you could make lemonade off it.
Grow up.
McCain may pay his women staffers more, but that is still not enough reason to vote for him. If I had been a supporter of HRC, I would have honored the principles she espouses by NOT voting for McCain. In addition, he has shown a propensity to make major gaffes in an area where he is supposed to be strong--namely, foreign affairs.
And impugning your opponent's patriotism is beyond the pale.
Plus, McCain is aligning himself with people who disrespected him and his family back in 2000, just as the people who want to vote for McCain after Hillary Clinton was not chosen as the nominee
seem conveniently to forget that he disrespected her in one of the worst ways a parent can be disrespected--by calling her child ugly. All this because he despised her parents. If I revered anyone as much as many people revere Hillary Clinton, I could never support a man who insulted her child.
And Biden never disrespected Stinky? Please....and if you had listened to what McCain actually said instead of taking your talking points from the handlers, he said he questioned Stinky's judgment.
Guess you didn't hear that because it's not something you would want to hear.
This election is NOT about who has more houses or calling a child ugly--if that's what's uppermost in your mind, maybe you need to do some serious growing up, along with your candidate. This is not a high school popularity contest, and there are far more important issues. Rather than look at issues, you look at emotions. Sad for you.
As for stinky's patriotism? He has none--neither does his wife or any of his associates.
Of course, we ALL know that Obama's opponents called him inexperienced. That is what all of Obama's opponents, Democratic and Republican, counted on to discount him.
And worrying about someone's lapses in an area where he is supposed to be strong, as well as his belligerence in foreign policy matters, has nothing to do with a popularity contest. It is not reassuring to me for someone to make as many gaffes as McCain has. These are things that should give any thoughtful person pause.
I have been polite to you, because I don't think that getting personal--especially with someone you don't even know--shows maturity.
I am sure we can agree without being disagreeable, don't you think? And furthermore, anyone who has voted with Bush at least 95% of the time is a poor risk.
As we all, know, experience does not necessarily translate to good judgement. The war in Iraq
certainly proves that point.
So what is Stinky's experience? Detail it. ALL of it, the whole 145 days experience. What has he done? Oh, and no more attempts at spin--that's why we get personal. You cannot face yourself in the mirror and see just how inane you sound and look when you espouse such nonsense as "he called her ugly so I won't vote for him". Let's hear your stand on some REAL issues, huh? Go for it--and it's a pretty good bet, there's not a whole lot you can point to as to experience.
You are more worried about a popularity contest than you are about this country--all dems are, particularly if they are backing this empty headed empty suit.
You have your homework--defend your position. In detail.
ms. beth:
I am not going to argue any further with you because you are too emotional to keep from getting personal to get the point. I think that insulting a child does reveal a lot about the character of the person--but far more importantly (a point you totally have missed), McCain's policies scare me.
He claims to be for veterans, but he has opposed important legislation concerning their benefits while Obama has supported them.
Obama has worked with laid-off steel workers to help them become employed while he was in
Chicago.
His judgement about Iraq has been spot-on. Even George Bush is now contemplating a time-table for us to leave Iraq. I also like his calm and deliberative approach to foreign affairs.
These are among the reasons I am voting for him, and I sincerely hope that he wins. I rest my case, whether you agree or not.
He has done nothing that would benefit this country. He has no accomplishments worthy of the highest office in the land. He is not qualified or capable. If McCain scares you and Stinky does not, how sad for you.
He only has a calm manner when he has a teleprompter. He cannot answer questions off the cuff, even to a 7 year old asking why he's running.
He is nothing. He is not qualified.
As far as insults--listening to your pastor insult your country for 20 years and not finding another church speaks volumes.
McCain's opposition to veteran's issues, again had you bothered to investigate, was supported by the veteran's themselves as the bills had severe loopholes and didn't really do a lot for them. Just supporting a bill is not enough--you have to know what's in it.
How sad for you he--and you--think he is.
Now, answer the question and defend--what are Stinky's qualifications for CIC?
BO has NO qualifications to be CiC. 140+ days in the Senate and voting "present" more than aye or nay do NOT a CiC make.
Having 300+ foreign advisers does NOT a CiC make.
And yes, some ARE voting for him because of his colour. It really would be wonderful if there was a black candidate to vote for. One that INSPIRES the nation; one that has not wallowed in the pits of racism and bigotry. (And the public record shows he has.) A black person who has given to America, as a positive role model. BO (nor his wife btw. Great description of her, Miss Beth.lol) is NOT that candidate.
He has done NOTHING for the country.
And that is my opinion as one who LOVES America, and "hopes" that America will not "change".....Just sayin..
Even George Bush is now contemplating a time-table for us to leave Iraq. I also like his calm and deliberative approach to foreign affairs.
Ummmmmmmmmmm I almost missed THAT gem....lol
OF COURSE President Bush is looking at a timetable. In case it escaped you ANNE, our troops had a mission; those who KNOW, know that their mission is almost accomplished. (btw? Have you talked to an Iraqi lately and asked THEIR opinion? I have..) I'll spare you the specifics.Your brain might explode, BUT tell me why our troops would stay once their job is done......DUH!!!
And BO's "calm and deliberative approach to foreign affairs"??????????? Good grief. Ya mean like Georgia (and no - I don't mean the Georgia that *might* be one of the 57 states he was referring to...just sayin......)
You just stay in your bubble of denial over there. (I am being kind here..lol)
Because, brat, that's the pack of lies fed to them with the koolaid, which they willingly swallow in their elitism.
They have no concept of reality because of where their heads (and consequently their branicases) are perpetually stuck. No one said there was anything in the braincases, though...just sayin'
We sure would like to see more of Hillary supporters that will vote for McCain / Palin
Commenting by HaloScan
