Read the commenting rules carefully because they will be enforced!
READ THE RULES OF POSTING----Anonymous postings not allowed.---spree
Edited By Siteowner
"Their has been a concentrated effort on behalf of the Democratic party to country this Victory Tour"
What does that mean?
It is all right here:
http://wwwwakeupamericans-spree....untered-
by.html
The four Democratic organizational websites are counter rallying against the Victory Tour.
Promises to be a lively day in Carson City and San Francisco.
Then tomorrow starts day #2.
The Dems have too much invested in defeat. Well, they are about to get their butts "Rocked" Ref video under "America Rising...Be There!!"
hell yeah!!!!
Oh, you mean COUNTER!! Sorry, I didn't get the phrase-ology
My bad!!! Sorry. Welcome to Wake up America.
3700
3700? huh?
3700 dead beautiful humans for what? a war that was based on lies.
Once again, THAT talking dull... try actually reading the joint resolution that authorized our actions in Iraq, there were 23 reasons listed and ONLY one of which hasn't been proven yet.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/r...20021002-
2.html
There is the actual Resolution and in case you are too lazy to do the actual homework which proves your lies for what they are here are the top 7 reasons why Congress and the Senate authorized this war:
1. Iraq's harboring of Al-Queda terrorists
2. Iraq's support for International Terrorism
3. Iraq's "brutal repression" of its citizens
4. Iraq's failure to repatriate or give information on non-Iraqi citizens detained and captured during Gulf War I, including an American serviceman;
5. Failing to properly return property wrongfully seized during the Kuwait invasion
6. The attempted assassination of former President Bush in 1991
7. America's national security interests in restoring peace and stability to the Persian Gulf
Lest not forget the Democratic statements made BEFORE Bush ever became president:
“One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line.”
President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998
“If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction program.”
President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998
Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face.”
Madeline Albright, Feb. 18, 1998
“He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983.”
Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb. 18, 1998
“Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process.”
Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D,CA), Dec. 16, 1998
“Hussein has … chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies.”
Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999
Then we can look at the statements made by MORE Democrats before we invaded Iraq:
“There is no doubt that … Saddam Hussein has invigorated his weapons
programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue at a pace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of an illicit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies.”
Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, Dec . 5, 2001
“We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical
weapons throughout his country.”
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
“Iraq’s search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power.”
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
“We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction.”
Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27,2002
“I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force– if necessary– to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security.”
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002
“In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons.”
Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10,2002
“There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years. We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction.”
Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002
Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal,
murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime. He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation. And now he is miscalculating America’s response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction. So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real”
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan.23. 2003
So, who lied again John??????
ALL the democratic politicians you say? No?
Explain those statements and do some homework before you make yourself look any more foolish than you just did.
Isupportthetroops.Butthepurposeofthetroopsistokill
people,mostlyinnocentcivilians.Ifwewanttosupportou
rtroops,bringthemhome!
George do you deliberately ignore the troops words and still claim to support them?
Ignoring what they say is not support.
spree; what does democrats statements have to do with having a war that is killing our people. many of them proudly doing the job but not the reason they joined the reserves in the first place, right?
YOU made accusations that the war was based on lies.. "I" just showed you it wasn't.
Considering the war is in the 4th year, that TOO is a lie on your part, anyone joining any branch of military as well as the reserves KNOW they will potentially be sent to Iraq.
Our military deaths have been cut in half since the surge began and progress is being seen at every level in Iraq, militarily and politically as we have shown and linked to on many posts.
Defeat is not a plan of victory and you are naive if you think a premature withdrawal and surrendering Iraq would make our country any safer.
TRY LISTENING TO WHAT THE TROOPS ARE TELLING YOU and get off your "lied" meme, for no one lied and we are fighting to rebuild Iraq and deny them a safe haven.
Get a clue and try doing your homework instead of repeating tired old, debunked lies.
Looks like John is reading from the lefty script. At first I thought I had hit an archive cause I heard these words before.
Yes, the exact phrasing too.
Amazing.
First he claims the war was based on lies, evidently never having actually reading the resolution itself which disproves this, so I provided him with the comments of the Democrats themselves.
Then he proceeds to lie again claiming those joining the reserves don't know they will be going to Iraq.
who cares what the dem's said, they where supplied all the information (lies) by the republican admin. anyway, my point is , every time we don't like what a country is saying and doing we shouldn't invade. imagine 3700 times every country we invade. there are better ways to do it. by the way how many reserves where in when the war started, do you think they joined to go to war, i doubt it.
Did you even BOTHER to look at the dates john?
try to SEE what your eyes are telling you here:
THOSE STATEMENTS WERE FROM THE CLINTON ADMINISTRATION DURING BILL CLINTON'S PRESIDENCY.
Once again you are proving that you either didn't know that Clinton in 1998 was president, OR that you didn't know bill Clinton was a democrat ....either way, that shows you don't really know what you are talking about here.
“One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line.”
President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998
“If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction program.”
President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998
Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face.”
Madeline Albright, Feb. 18, 1998
“He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983.”
Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb. 18, 1998
“Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process.”
Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D,CA), Dec. 16, 1998
“Hussein has … chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies.”
Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999
The information Bush inherited was from the Democratic administration.... so are you saying Bill Clinton and his whole administration was lying????????????????
why don't you publish my whole comment.
Of course he knows clinton was in the wh in 1998 and of course he knows bubba is a democrat (closest thing to a communist/fascist/socialist there is today without actually claiming such--he just wants to argue...trouble is, he doesn't have a leg to stand on, he started facetiously with a number, stated the war was started on lies, when debunked, implies our volunteer reservists (note how he only singles out reservists) are too stupid to know they're going to war and they're volunteering on lies--and now is trying to keep up the ridiculous circular argument which belongs in the circular file. Remember you pic of the dog chasing his tail!
miss beth 3700 dead.
John, haloscan publishes the comments, which is why you see that I separate my long answers. They only provide room for "so much" so if your answers are long, it is best to divide them into two.
In the meantime, what have you got to say to the Democratic administration of 1998 and the comments and information that was handed down to the Republican president, Bush?
You lied when you said the the Democrats made those statements from information given to them from the Republicans.
Why would you lies about that?
Thats three lies you have deliberately tried to spread here on this thread.
This begs the question of: Can you not provide an argument based in truth?
Why do feel the need to lie if you are so sure you are right?
so be it/ bye
LOL at the dog tail chasing picture Beth, yup. But I am curious anyway if he feels he is arguing for the right cause why he is deliberately tring to lie instead of using verifiable facts as we have provided him.
It is curious
He runs!!! Can't answer questions? Cannot argue the facts. Gets called out and proven to be a liar and when called out he runs?
Oh well, we don't call them the surrender crowd for nothing I guess.
Okay John, you got all the answers. What should be done?
3700 dead is a unfortunate number but it is the result of war. I wonder how many babies are aborted each year? I bet you support that. They never "signed up" to be aborted.
200 civilians butchered almost every month. (2400 a year)
200,000 violent acts each year
$20 million spent TODAY on housing prisoners.
No, not Iraq, California. JUST CALIFORNIA
Where is lefty outrage about this?
John, you are on a right wing page, with right wing minded folks, surely you do not expect any one of them to bend and agree on anything. They reach into their bag and pull out the "lefty" comments and now, I wait with baited breath (not really) for the "liberal" comments to fly.
As offensive as I might find some of their comments, the beauty of it is this.....this is what America is about - the freedom to believe how you want, whether anyone supports your belief or not. FREEDOM. I defend the rights of the neocons, whackos, rightys, leftys, middle of the roaders, socialists, etc.. Each and everyone one of us have the right to free speech and the right to freedom.
Which one out of your list Spree was the lie? Cuz I am seeing more than 1, just want to know which one you felt was the lie.
Also, let's be honest here, there are just as many troops who are against this war. You can post comments from troops for it and someone else can go find comments against it.
I am an American, I support our troops BUT I do not support this ill conceived, profit generating war. (Profit generating for a lot of corporations conveniently tied to this administration). By the way, that is not bush-bashing. 3700 and counting John.
Deb... argue ONE point we have made. Show one quote that was misquoted.
Jon came here and deliberately lied, we did not attack him in a partisan manner, we provided FACTUAL DATA.
3700 dead beautiful humans for what? a war that was based on lies.
john goodwin | 09.03.07 - 1:15 pm | #
If you have read the Joint Resolution deb, which the link to was provided above, you would see that was his first lie.
Then he claimed:
spree; what does democrats statements have to do with having a war that is killing our people. many of them proudly doing the job but not the reason they joined the reserves in the first place, right?
john goodwin | 09.03.07 - 1:44 pm | #
Anybody joining any banch of the military or reserves know their is the probability they will be going to Iraq.
Then the BIG lie, after being shown the quotes from the Democratic politicians in 1998, from Clintons administration, he said this:
who cares what the dem's said, they where supplied all the information (lies) by the republican admin.
So, either that was a deliberate lie or he actually didn't know Clinton was president in 1998, OR he didn't know Clinton was a Democrat.
Thhe lie, that those comments were supplied by information by the Republicans when those 1998 statements were made.
Honest? No, that is not honest, on record the amount of troops against the war are under 1/8 of the amount that support the effort and have spoken publicly about being left to finish what they started.
Again, I provided my sources, direct quotes, letters and interviews from the troops in Iraq as well as those that have just returned from Iraq:
http://wwwwakeupamericans-spree....- executive.html
My news comes directly from the horses mouth so to speak...so my question is: where are you getting your news from?
deb,
I can remember the big rally that Ms Sheehan had March 17th, 2007. They promised to bring 1000's of Iraq Veterans who were against the war. I was there with the GoE.
I did not see the 1000's they said would join them. I saw 2 who were wearing some kind of uniform. Of the 2, one was outed as being a fraud. I am not sure about the other one.
The silent majority is waking up to groups such as ANSWER, Code Pink, MoveOn.org. These groups claim to be anti-war but they are ant-American. I am not saying that because they sell themselves as ant-war, I am saying that because the are Soros backed socialists.
Tell ya what Deb, here is a challenge for you right this second;
Here is 3282 from just one place, all active military men and women.
http://www.appealforcourage.org/...rg/
Default.aspx
As an American currently serving my nation in uniform, I respectfully urge my political leaders in Congress to fully support our mission in Iraq and halt any calls for retreat. I also respectfully urge my political leaders to actively oppose media efforts which embolden my enemy while demoralizing American support at home. The War in Iraq is a necessary and just effort to bring freedom to the Middle East and protect America from further attack.
You find me 3282 active military with a different message.
Can you or will you run from the challenge because YOU cannot produce as many active military as we just have?
We are willing to back up our claims with facts, figures and names, are you?
John was partially correct about one thing: the death count, which would have been 0 if we'd sent Little Boy & Fat Man instead of invading. Where's Harry Truman when we need him?
Lets do it right in Iran. No more casualties; no more quagmires!!!
Spree -- you are assuming that these propaganda-spouting robots are going to actually be swayed by the facts.
They HATE facts, they interfere with their stupid hand-me-down opinions.
Hey, what I am asking for is easy....deb said that just as many military are against our actions as are for them... I produced the facts, figures and names of 3282 that support the war, can she produce 3282 that do not...hell can she produce HALF that amount?
I have seen no answers from her.
Ben... I truly hope that if we are forced to take Iran's nuclear facilities out, that we do it from air and sea and not a boot touches the ground.
BUT, lets not get ahead of ourselves, there are still a few months left to push the UN to make the next sanctions mean something and get this done diplomatically.
There is still time.
John and Deb--3700 dead over 4+ years
Abortion (for Bob--and THANK YOU for addressing it)--4,000 DEAD DAILY.
John and Deb--don't spout death count numbers to me until you can explain the left's support of killing unborn children without due process under Constitutional law, from a Constitutional Amendment enacted in a proper Constitutional process while y'all try to get off death row inmates tried and convicted in lawful jurisprudence actions.
Further, how many MORE lives are destroyed daily with the experimental embryonic stem cell research when over the past 30 years it's been PROVEN time and again ADULT stem cells are more efficacious, provide more results and DON'T kill the ADULT.
DON'T even START with me on death counts until you can support your culture of death and the attendant bullshit of justification of murder of the unborn.
Beth, stop holding back woman!!! Tell us how you REALLY feel.
(grinnnnning cheeeeeekily here)
They seem to forget the majority cost of this war is for the technology that has KEPT our casualty rates so low to begin with--if it weren't for the intel technology (which certainly isn't cheap), we'd have an enormous body count. And yet they bitch about enriching corporations.
So what do they want--more body bags? Would that be acceptable to them so the money wasn't spent on the technology keeping those body bags to an absolute minimum?
Well, I for one say this--each and every troop death is a tragedy, yes, ABSOLUTELY---BUT...SPEND THE MONEY DAMMIT--and for those who think our troops are blind idiots who don't know what they're signing up for, PULL YOUR HEADS OUT OF YOUR ASSES and quite treating them like idiot children--they KNOW what they're signing up for and they STILL have the courage to do so to protect YOU AND ME and our freedoms here at home.
They need to get off the typical doublespeak of "too much money, enriching corporations BUT too many troops dead"...HATE that hypocritical, talk out of both sides of the mouth crap!
Thats better Beth, I knew you had more in ya!!
LOLOLOLOLOL! Sick and TIRED of their crap! America hating pinkos...
Oh my, shouting and raging...typical!!
YOU have no freaking idea if I am for or against abortion - so stick that argument up your wazoo. Just because I disagree with you on this war does not make me a pinko, whacko freak - (AHEM - turn the mirror please!).
You also have no freakin idiotic idea as to how I feel about Stem Cell Research now do you? Yep, spouting off your little tirade without having the benefit of knowledge about what you are spouting off about. I think that makes you look foolish.
You go Miss Beth, you certainly must feel like you accomplished something, when in fact you just showed your complete ignorance of the subject. Abortion and stem cell research have nothing to do with the discussion of this war. When you lose a loved one over there - come calling!
P. S.
Spree, still waiting on which "one" is the lie in the list.
Also, am I to assume that all of you are closet homosexuals waiting to pick up someone in a public restroom? Since so many on your side of the fence are being busted for that these days. LOL... I assume, you all are a bunch of sicko, bathroom lurking, closet homosexuals... (get the point!)
Deb, I provided the names, figures, links, rank of 3282 to support my facts... where is yours?
You made a claim, but you aren't preapred to back it up with some verifiable information?
Is that how you usually operate?
BOB
Being anti-war does not make you anti-American. That is where you need to get off.
Already provided you all three with the blockquoted comments deb with the proof they were lies....come on, keep up and answer the challenge.
The reason you keep tying to distract from it is because you CANNOT produce even half of the 3282, which made your "claim" nothing more than talk with no basis of fact to back it up.
Well, since this is where you all are, might I chime in?
Hello Roger! Happy labor Day 
I have something to say, slightly off topic.
I wonder if any liberal has the cojones to go tell a soldier that he/she are our "boys and girls"? I know many many armed forces and every single one of them would be offended. They are MEN and WOMEN, who take their jobs very seriously. They are very proud of what they do every day. That liberals prefer to look at them as juveniles is so denigrating. I suppose it makes their arguments more specious.
Good point Michelle. Thanks and not off topic at all, it is a valid question.
Just like the body count they want us to get upset about without addressing the body count going on daily here---
Deb I don't give a rat's ass what your views are on abortion or stem cell research--I was illustrating a point--sorry you missed it, as usual.
And, before you go into homosexuals, go look at Barney Franks. We get rid of our wrongdoers--why are yours still in office?
Oh sorry, you did - you all just went rabid and I was trying to read all the comical stuff written. I had to stop a few times to wipe the tears from my eyes from laughing so hard.
Challenge - ok how lame
http://www.ivaw.org/
http://www.westpointgradsagainst...r.org/
index.htm
http://www.gsfp.org/
http://www.veteransforpeace.org/
It does not matter, you all will refuse to accept that more Americans are against this war than are for it. The numbers on your FAIR & BIASED FOX station even shows that. Lest you try to accuse the LIBERAL Media of tainting the numbers. LOL... If anyone posts anything that contradicts what any of you believe, you want to discredit it and throw in the abortion, stem cell argument..
So let's see, murders are the fault of people who do not believe this war is a good thing? Ok. Let's see, I am trying to connect abortion to the war... how do I get there? Wait, let me take the zombie pill so I can march down to the kool aid bowl with the rest of you and then I might get it.
Wake up and smell the stench... it is not coming from the LIBERALS - who are not hanging out in the bathrooms of public parks trying to get BJs from other men.... LOL - how proud you all must be of all the old white men getting busted for that huh? The GOP - gay old party!!
Chill out - man you all are missing dinner to post this dribble? Please, see you at the protest!!!
How about addressing the cost issue brought up regarding the technology saving soldier's lives and ignoring the question you were asked about why your corrupt representatives are still in office while we get rid of ours...
Obviously you are very much FOR the culture of death if you can laugh about abortion and stem cell research, can't see a connection with the hypocrisy of screaming about body counts in Iraq while this crap is going on every day and your ability to extrapolate an argument is non-existent-as evidenced by your hyena braying
No one went Rabid deb, they simply brought out FACTS and you spoke before looking for your answers. Take some responsibility for a change.
By the way Deb...I listed 3282 ACTIVE military personnel, not veterans, if you want to start with Veterans than you forgot a few organizations:
http://www.gatheringofeagles.org/
http://www.rollingthunder1.com/
http://www.vetsforfreedom.org/
That last one was not just vets, they are IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN VETERANS.
http://www.vets4victory.com/
Then we have Families United for the troops and their mission:
http://www.familiesunitedmission.com/
YOUR NUMBERS don't equal a small fraction of veterans and you still have AVOIDED, whether deliberate or not, naming, active military members as I have.
3282 of them on just THAT site.
So, can you or can't you?
Quit trying to distract with URL's that do not meet the criteria of Active Military Deb.
Either you can back up your claims or you cannot.
By the way, this last link is the ultimate in Veterans with more members that all your goups added together and even mine:
http://www.legion.org/
deb,
There are people who are anti-war who are not anti-American. However, if you explore the roots of the above mentioned organizations, you will see that they are anti-American.
Everybody has a right to express their opinion and it should be honest and out in the open. They shouldn't hide behind a socialist agenda. When I saw these folks March 17th in DC they had a hard time rounding up an American Flag. When they did find a few, they had one hanging upside down and they were dragging another one on the ground.
Please Deb,check out the background of these groups. We will be facing off against them again in DC on September 15th. They don't speak for me and I hope they don't speak for you.
Didn't think she could match the numbers.
Once again, people speaking without being able to back up ANY of their "claims".
Dinner is four hours off Deb, yet another false assumption.
Deb, with so many sites (sarcasm) that support your ideal, why are you here?
As to "missing dinner to post this dribble", you might want to think about what you just said. As most liberals, you just "assume". It's what your party did in the 2000 elections when you called the polls closed in FL (a full hour before they closed in a large part of the state) because you were all too dumb to know that Florida has two time zones. It might be dinner time on the East coast, but there is a whole lot of the country that isn't on the same time as you.
Bob, I appreciate you giving deb the benefit of doubt but as I stand by and understand everything behind the organizations I listed, do you not think she stands behind those she listed? She DID list them after all.
If she does not stand by them, yet listed them, then that shows the height of irresponsibility.
Ugh Spree????? You are on the "left" coast??? You have my sympathies sweetie.
LOL Michelle..I moved here to get away from the cold icky weather. This is heaven to me!!
You missed out, this is paradise! AND a very "right wing" part of the country. I suppose the five military bases in the area help with that.
Here's our beaches:http://www.destinfl.com/beaches.htm
I guess she does spree.
LOL, omg, I miss the beach. Originally I was from Miami, where beaches were beautiful, now I am in AZ and the weather is wonderful, my pool is huge and I love it, but still miss the beach!!!
Well Bob, perhaps she just did a search and didn't bother to look at the organization history, but I find that very irresponsible if that is the case.
But it goes to show how nice you are that you automatically gave the benfit of the doubt.
A sweetie through and through you are.
I am also from Miami, but moved to the panhandle because the schools here are the #1 in the state. Have to keep the kiddies educated, you know.
Definitely!!! Another Miami girl huh? I KNEW I liked ya.
lol. Miami Shores!
Grew up mostly in Broward County though.
Pembroke Pines, Cooper City, etc.
"A sweetie through and through you are."
Did I ever tell you I am a Chippendale dancer? LOL
South Miami here, then Miami Beach right on the sand.
Pembroke Pines is beautiful though.
OMANNNNN Bob...PICTURES!!!!!!(lol)
(doing the new boogie my daughter taught me) Spree is a hometown girl!!!!!!!!
Bob??????
Share man........
I wanna seee!!!!!!!!!!!
I'll post some photos of me in my speedo's. PLEASE, be sure you haven't eaten just before you look at them. Don't want anyone getting sick. LOL,
taps foot, waiting.
Bob, two impatient women, boy are you in trouble.
No foot taping. Just wait, I need to get a wide angle lens. LOL
Ok, THAT cracked me up.
Women are not known for their patience...heh
Memories of home Spree?
Here's something for you:
http://
www.joycesfinecooking.com...ban_recipes.htm
Make that THREE impatient women!
Okay, sorry to keep you waiting.
Ooops sorry, forgot to post the link http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C...h?
v=CvN7J8kXang
lol @ Miss Beth.
Didn't show up the first time
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C...h?
v=CvN7J8kXang
got it now, checking it out.
How funny and now that song will be with me all night...LOLOL
Thanks for the memories Michelle!
Beth, you too now?
Alright Bob, were you hiding in my closet with a camera---no one was supposed to know the hippo is my alter ego! LOL...
QUICK--here's raoula's debut on stage and he's PURPLE!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U...related&
search=
LOL Miss Beth,
I need to try to remember which one of my GoE friends goes by the name Hungry Hippo. Think he would like that Vid.
I think I just fell in love with a series of videos...lol...they're hilarious!
LOLO Miss Beth. You been checking the side bar haven't you?
Wow, talk about a thread hijack.
Guilty as charged! On both counts...but YOU, Bob...well, YOU mentioned Chippendale's and, well, um....
well, um.... thats all it took!!!!
ok, since Miss Beth Hijacked already, check out this video:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=wCF3ywukQYA
warning, it's a little twisted.
Michelle, in case you haven't noticed "I" am more than a little "twisted"...hehe
Oh great, you will love that!
PLease note, you will not be able to get this stupid song out of your head ever!
A LITTLE twisted?
ok, ok, more than a little
chuckle
Heh, Hawk, welcome to the party. Yes Michelle more than a little..and that song IS stuck in my head.
Well, well -- whadaya know. Happy Labor day to you, Michelle! I just got back from our local airport where I was hanging around the men's room waiting for a little action, but everybody must be at the beach. So I came back home and turned on the Mysterious Machine -- just in time to see our friend Deb disappear into the sunset.
Oh well, maybe she'll be back later for some more punishment -- some people like it, you know --
IHHR
Folks... I added the Bush video with a note under it.
I show you exactly which part to listen for, listen to those troops when Bush talks about politicians, polls and media......HOOOOOOOOOOOWAAAAAAHHHHHHHH
Here's a vid I found On Illinois Review by Freedoms watch. How true
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c...h?v=ck18N3-
4szk
I have a strange desire to go shopping now...something about shoes...
Spree--what's the Bush link?
Roger!!!!!!!!!!!! My very favorite!!!!!!!!
How great to see you.
Bathroom action a little slow these days?
Yes, Debra assumed there were no time zones in the US and everyone posts from NYC. You do know us hicks in the rest of the US can't possibly know how to operate a PC, much less have a use for one
http://wwwwakeupamericans-spree....it-to-
iraq.html
There ya go Beth, at the bottom, the video, just scroll the bar to 1 minute 30 second lefts and listen to how they HOOOOOOWAHHHHH when Bush comments that decisions will be made from conditions on the ground and NOT nervous politicians listening to polls in the media...LOL
Ok folks... new car is here and I am gonna go ZOOOOOOOOM ZOOOOOOM ZOOOOOM in it for a bit.
See ya'll later.
Thanks Spree..enjoy!
Great videos! And hello to you, my dear Michelle. Hope you're having as nice a day as I am. So far, at least, since that mix up the other day, I've only been arguing with those people with whom I intended to be arguing with. This makes it a heck of a lot easier to win the arguments.
Luv,
Roger
New car !! Right on, Spree!
"Being anti-war does not make you anti-American. That is where you need to get off."
Unless you are a veteran you are not qualified to make that statement. Ask someone who is laying their butt on the line so that you can make comments on a blog how they feel. Ask them if they feel that people like you embolden the enemy. Ask them if they feel appreciated when they hear about their government officials stabbing them in the back.
Ask them what it's like to spend their days in a pressure cooker while people say ignorant things like anti-war isn't anti-American. Wake up we are in war, where you are anti war or not. So don't pretend that you are a patriot red blooded American when people like you puff up the chests of those who want YOU and I dead.
Let me guess, you also think the Islam is a peaceful religion and us "right wing" wackos have that one wrong to. Guess what? The same ones that are covering your butt now will have to cover your butt when you finally figure out the truth about that too!
Way to go, C. P.! You got that right!
I'll only repeat what I said earlier -
If you try to undermine the moral integrity of your country while your country is at war you are a traitor. Plain and simple.
I have been monitoring this "chat" and it merely supports that which we have been saying for MONTHS and MONTHS!
The Leftinistra have ZERO legs to stand on and repeat the same old lies...NO new material and this proves them to be 100% and totally, certifiably insane.
Rubber rooms available anywhere?
Roger, I posted this before on a different topic but it needs to be repeated now.
"A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself." Cicero (d. 43 BC)
Thank you, Snopper. And Bob, I have seen that before, and it's absolutely right.
PS: Snooper this guy's still yaking on and on over at Deb's. In case you want to join in again. I'll send the url in my next comment.
Guess I can't send the url as a comment but it's on the HQ site.
Of course you can send URL's
Night everyone, see ya'll in the AM...
Nighty-night, Spree.
Dream about your new car.
John Goodwin, 3700 troops have sacrificed their lives and it'll only be a waste if we leave before the war is won. Your comments dishonor the fallen and the serving.
Did you see the video today of the troops and their thunderous praise of Pres. Bush in Anbar Province? Why do you suppose that is? Because they know Bush lied and their lives are being wasted? No, because they know they have a Commander in Chief they can trust and gets it.
Joe Wilson lied, not Bush.
So what's the big lie, John? The big lie is that a Saddam Hussein left in power would not threaten U.S. security. We know he supported the 9/11 attack even if he had nothing to do with organizing it. But let's say Saddam only killed millions of his own people and the humanitarian crisis, as well as U.S. money from the U.N. Oil for Food scandal that supported Saddam lining his toilets in gold while his people suffered and died didn't really matter.
Does this matter? Saddam had designs on nuclear weapons. He had them, used them in the past and was on his way to developing more. What would a future in Iraq look like with two demonic heirs waiting to take their dad's place? Qusay Hussein was head of the WMD program and Saddam's sons were arguably worse than he was.
Not to mention Saddam didn't keep the cease fire agreement from the 1991 war so the war technically never ended. We had every right to oust him.
And did you know Saddam tried to assassinate Bush Sr. in Kuwait in 1994? Clinton bombed a military site in Iraq as retribution, one of the few good things to come from the Clinton presidency. Trying to assassinate an American president, believe it or not, is cause for all out war all on its own.
The lie is that we shouldn't be in Iraq. The lie is that the war isn't winnable. The lie is that the world would have been better off under Saddam Hussein. The lie is that U.S. troops are victims and not heroic volunteers.
Like I have said MANY times over, Amy...YOU ROCK!!
"...The lie is that we shouldn't be in Iraq. The lie is that the war isn't winnable. The lie is that the world would have been better off under Saddam Hussein. The lie is that U.S. troops are victims and not heroic volunteers..."
EXACTLY true!!
Wow Amy, that's a mouthful of truth! I just posted story about Bush in Anbar on my site. Snoop, remember the emails from Carnivore. Anbar wasn't a very nice place back then, eh?
I wish I knew what happened to Carnivore and his side-kick...
It appears that President Bush in spending 4 days in Australia has passed the previous record for a stay in a foreign country . To get an idea for what is really happening in Sydney , visit www.aussiesforanzus.com .
Commenting by HaloScan
