You know...I'd like to hear a bit more about that auto accident. Was there another driver involved? who? why didn't their auto insurance - or the other driver's - pay for the medical expenses?
suek | 10.10.07 - 2:23 pm | #

I would too SueK and am trying to research a bit of that.
Spree | Homepage | 10.10.07 - 2:29 pm | #

I disagree with the Republicans in most issues, but I´ve got to hand it to them, they handle politics much better. These democrats are very weak indeed, specially considering that they've got a lot of their work cut out for them...

Gotten that out of my chest, it is sad that they would use a child for political gains. Better yet, it is a shame that children be used for poltical gains in general.
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=LW...ogress%2Eorg% 2F
Heart warming. And very effecient...

It is also a pitty that either party or its followers now harass this family. Several rumours have surfaced, some suggesting they were well off and didn't deserve to enter the program.

If this is not true it is reckless difamation. If it is true, it is something to be corrected by the authorities or changed in the law. Either way, discussing the law should be the concern, not seeing go gets more points out attack ads.

Whatever the situation, I dont think this family deserves having theyr lives exposed in the media.
Politicians are the public animals, they created these campaigns, they should be able to handle their consequences. Not private citizens.

Well there I went again stretching out my comments...
Eduardo Dourado | 10.10.07 - 4:28 pm | #

I don't mind stretched out comments Eduardo.

The parents do have to hold onto a little bit of the responsibility here. Knowing what politics has come to today then willingly offered their child to shield the democrats.

They should have known better.
Spree | Homepage | 10.10.07 - 5:09 pm | #