Read the commenting rules carefully because they will be enforced!
Absotively! Been saying that for YEARS!!!
http://takeourcountryback-snoope.../List%20of%
2045
You are an authorized used of the Hillary blog. If you have a hankering, post this over there as well!!
http://stophernow.wordpress.com/
Take your hard earned money, give it to the poor, they can spend it however they want to. Sounds fair, if you live in an alternate universe.
Will do Snooper.
I know Debbie. Many of the "rich" DO give their money to charitable purposes, but that is THEIR decision, it is THEIR money and they have the "right" to choose who they donate to.
No one has the right to take it from them.
Wow! That's an awesome post. Thank you for it!
Your welcome. Took a while and part #2 is being written as I respond.
Check back for it or email me at: wakeupamerica.spree@gmail.com and I will make sure to send you the link when part #2 is published.
When you get Part 2 finished, please post it at the Hot Rodham Blog.
Thanks.
Of COURSE you radio superstar!!!! You were GREAT!!! I loved the show.
LOL!! Thanks.
hey spree posted this youtube video in a few places looks like a good fit here, enjoy hillary clinton 9/11 project
Great post, linking to it on my blog.
red
Thanks!!!!!! Also, thanks for stopping by.
somebody said...Hillary...
ARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGH!!
You should be ashamed of yourself for posting this ignorant drivel. It's a slap in the face to the millions of Russians, East Europeans, Cubans, Chinese and others who fled real communist regimes to come here for freedom. Ask any one of these refugees if the Democrats are communists and they will laugh in your face. If you think that communist oppression consists of the wealthy having to pay higher taxes, then you don't have a clue what that term means. I'm sure that the average North Korean would cut off his right arm to have a chance to live in America with Hillary as President. Why don't you spend some time in Cuba or North Korea and then tell us how "communist" the Democrats are!
Their words and actions speak for themselves. They ARE the communists of America, either dispute the examples or take your rhetoric elsewhere.
I dispute every one of those examples. They do not prove Hillary is a Communis any more than a believer in racial equality is a Communist because Communists believe that, too. What makes Communists distinct from liberals is their opposition to democracy, capitalism and human rights. Communist belief, put into practice wherever they have taken power, is based,among other things, on having a monopoly of political power, no rights for anyone else to challenge them and prison or death for anyone who tries, no freedom of speech, religion or press, no private ownership of factories, land, banks etc. and the complete subordination of all public discourse to the needs of the Communist Party. When Hillary calls for the abolition of the Bill of Rights, the execution or imprisonment of all Republicans, the shutting down of Fox News and conservative talk radio hosts and the complete government confiscation of all private property, then it would be correct to call her a Communist.
You have nothing to dispute the examples with...sorry but uninformed "opinions" doesn't change the comparisons shown, which are obvious to everyone BUT Clinton apologists.
You people are a riot.
Closing your eyes and refusing to see, doesn't make what is right in front of you go away, it just shows you cannot SEE it.
Fine. Look at your definitions of Communism-"a theory or system of social organization based on the holding of all property in common, actual ownership being ascribed to the community as a whole or to the state",and "a system of social organization in which all economic and social activity is controlled by a totalitarian state dominated by a single and self-perpetuating political party. Just because Hillary made somne comment about contributing to the common ground or the rich having to pay higher taxes cannot possibly imply support for a totalitarian state which holds all property in common. How can it? If that's the case,then Dwight Eisenhower was a Communist because he supported the draft, instituted for the "common good" and high income taxes. Richard Nixon also had to have been a Communist because he instituted wage and price controls. Right?
I find it interesting that you don't offer any quote from Hillary advocating the destruction of democracy or human rights,two other hallmarks of real Communism. How come?
I challenge you to show me any example of Hillary calling for the establishment of a totalitarian state controlled by a single party or demanding that ALL property be held in common. If you can't, then stop peddling this nonsense! It really is offensive to those who suffered under real Communism.
Besides, if you want to smear Hillary, you should find something more up-to-date than calling her a Communist. No one cares about Communism any more except those who have, or once had, to live under it. Why don't you try calling her an Islamic terrorist? That should resonate more these days. Oh, wait, you can't because she is a "godless secular humanist." Oh well, logic shouldn't really matter that much to someone who thinks Hillary thinks the same way as Stalin and Mao did.
Oh, I forgot to mention: I do NOT support Hillary for President.
I look at the Democrats STATED agenda, then compare it with the actual Communist Manifesto...if you are incapable of making those comparisons, that is YOUR problem, not mine. But when the words match EXACTLY, that speaks for itself!
Start making the comparisons instead of excuses.
YOU were told to address the topic of the post or not comment. READ THE RULES before commenting again or you will be banned. Either stay on topic or play elsehwere.....clear?----Spree
Edited By Siteowner
YOU have not dealt with the comparisons made and i will NOT allow you to distract from the vert essence of the post with your nonsense. Either address those comparisons and go elsewhere to play your "distraction" game. I do not write to have commenters try to demand where the conversation goes, I write and as the rules CLEARLY state, address the topic or be gone.
Is that clear enough for you? Or does it need to be made clearer?
ONCE AGAIN, YOU WILL FOLLOW THE RULES AND ADDRESS THE POST OR YOU WILL NOT COMMENT....THE COMPARISONS WERE MADE, DISPUTE THEM, PROVE THEY ARE NOT CORRECT COMPARISONS OR DON'T BOTHER TO COMMENT---SPREE
Edited By Siteowner
Unfortunately, it is not possible to deal with these comparisons you have made without addressing what many people have been trying to. Your argument is essentially the same as saying I am a dog because I have sex. Dogs have sex, and so do I. There are clear differences on both sides that make me me and dog dog. The seperation of a communist and a democrat can be made in the same simplistic way.
If you are trying to make the arguement that democrats have their roots in THE IDEA of communism, quite different from communism in practice so far, you are correct. To take this discussion any further you will need to study what socialism and communism meant before the Soviet Union was created, as this is where the social movement in the U.S.A. came from. You may find that what these socialists hoped to achieve was quite beautiful, in theory.
Interesting comparisons. But don't you think its a little extreme? "The state attempted to become the soul distributor as well as the sole producer." Maybe I missed something, but when has the Democratic party ever made such bold statement such as this one listed as a Communist principle? Never knew that the "common good" was such an ugly and controversial perspective. Yes, the idea of "taking from the rich to give to the poor" is a valid comparison, but on a much smaller scale, don't you think? We do have a system set up for creating laws and taxing our citizens in case you forgot. Isn't it a valid argument that million and billion dollar corporations can afford to pay a slightly higher tax rate than a mother of three working at Wall-Mart? To compare the democratic ideals to Communism is a far stretch. And quit frankly an ignorant and offensive view. Take a quick trip to Cuba and then see if you have the audacity to belittle their true pain and suffering by comparing Communism to the democratic ideals. And as for your hypothetical "What Ifs?" open your eyes and take a look around, thanks to money hungry Republicans like you, NAFTA and other trade agreements have given thees corporations all the encouragement to leave and say screw you to the American workforce. So its ok for huge cooperations to fill the pockets of empty minded politicians but its not ok to provide the struggling family with a bit more support and services? Shouldn't we all be working for the "common good?"
Commenting by HaloScan
