What?

      

Far be it from me to criticise a publisher, but given that we already knew we wouldn't get paid or credited for any reprint, wouldn't it have been polite to at least let us know about the republication for the good of our egos? Yes.



> Far be it from me to criticise a publisher

Yes, I've noticed that about you.



I'm assuming you're being sarky, but I really don't usually criticise publishers. Apart from the ones that go bust owing me large sums of money. Bah.



You criticise music publishers. But that, admittedly, clearly wasn't the type of publisher you meant. I shall off and get someone to slap my wrists.


> I'm assuming you're being sarky

You're never going to go far wrong with assumptions like that.



> You criticise music publishers.

Not very often - only when they go after lyrics sites. It tends to be record companies, rather than the publishing firms.

Pedantic? Me?



As I've mentioned before, I'm in no position to criticise pedantry.


Name:
Email:
URL:

Comment:


 


If you're really that interested, here's an RSS feed for the latest comments to this blog. Never miss another pointless argument.

Of course comments are moderated, in a common-sense sort of a way. You don't have to give your email address to post here.

If you know your HTML, you can use <a>, <b>, and <i> tags, and entities, too. If you don't, you can still use them, but with a greater sense of trepidation.

Cheers.




Comment management by HaloScan.