|
| ||
|
|
||
|
|
[deleted] |
|
|
|
||
|
|
Sorry, old chap, I realise that the above is probably not related to the point you were trying to make. But I felt it was relevant anyway. |
|
|
|
||
|
|
How can you simultaneously realise that it's not related and feel that it is relevant? |
|
|
|
||
|
|
You know, on second thoughts, I'm going to delete that, Tom. I'm not averse to you going off at a tangent, but try to stay in the right ambience: a post about an interesting point of linguistics is not to be turned into a diatribe about abortion. It's not like we're so short of political and moral arguments round here that we need to crowbar extra ones in. |
|
|
|
||
|
|
This could be complete half-remembered bollocks, but I vaguely recall hearing that Finnish is the only European language with a genuinely gender-neutral third-person pronoun. |
|
|
|
||
|
|
English used to have. The word "she" is a relatively recent addition to the language, introduced because the language was becoming so ambiguous it was useless. |
|
|
|
||
|
|
Ooops, my sincere apologies for that. I misjudged the ambience, as you said. |
|
|
|
||
|
|
No worries. We've all done it. |
|
|
|
||
|
|
||
Comment management by HaloScan. |
||