|
| ||
|
|
||
|
|
I guess so, in fact it would probably be OK for the advert to run "This is a graphic picture of how we will torture your family if we catch you pirating our product", just so long as no-one is depicted smoking a cigarette in the picture. |
|
|
|
||
|
|
I hope no one actually reads this because I'll get my knuckles rapped for certain but the obnoxious anti-piracy ads are correct; copyright violation is a form of theft. Leaving out the legalisms is meant to get through to dumb bricks (not you, of course) that have a visceral feel for, "I take yours; you take mine". In the US we have to tell knot heads that shoplifting is theft as though they might lift a store off its foundation without this important clarification. |
|
|
|
||
|
|
> copyright violation is a form of theft |
|
|
|
||
|
|
Yup, like Raven said, both theft and piracy have legal definitions; and those definitions are different. Since they're both crimes, it seems reasonable to use their legal definitions. |
|
|
|
||
|
|
There's a reason for the lie, though, and it's a financial one. If you can persuade people that unauthorised duplication is theft, then you can persuade them that every unauthorised copy has deprived you of a sale. And of course, you can then attach a monetary value to that - even though in many cases, downloads are used to sample purchases in a try before you buy stylee. |
|
|
|
||
|
|
||
Comment management by HaloScan. |
||