|
| ||
|
|
||
|
|
Uh, I saw that, though that didn't squick me out nearly as much as this or this. |
|
|
|
||
|
|
"Squick"? |
|
|
|
||
|
|
Slang, from some teen movie, I think. Squicked out. I think it's passe now -- I have a hard time keeping up with my students' lingo. |
|
|
|
||
|
|
The newspaper's wrong when it says "trading standards' officers warned the manufacturers that they could face prosecution because it does not contain dragon". Trading Standards weren't complaining that the label said "dragon", but that it didn't say "pork". This struck me as reasonable - you ought to tell people what meat a sausage is made from - until I realised that presumably "pork" appears prominently on the list of ingredients, which can be read by anyone who wants to know what they're made from. It's all very silly. |
|
|
|
||
|
|
> Trading Standards weren't complaining that the label said "dragon", but that it didn't say "pork". A spokesman for Powys Council said: "The product Welsh Dragon Sausage was not sufficiently precise to inform a purchaser of the true nature of the food. Like I said in the post, officials defend their immensely stupid actions by appealing to imaginary people who are even more stupid. Would any vegetarian buy a sausage without reading the ingredients? Vegetarians don't buy anything without reading the ingredients. And since when is it the state's job to protect vegetarians from accidentally breaking their diet, anyway? Vegetarianism is a personal choice, not a human right. I notice this law doesn't seem to extend to hamburgers, for some reason. I can buy products called "burgers" or "hamburgers" in my local supermarket; "beef" doesn't always feature in the product's name. So what's so special about sausages that the state needs to intervene to prevent them being inadvertently purchased by fucking idiots? |
|
|
|
||
|
|
When a stupid man is doing something he knows is wrong, he always claims that it is his duty. |
|
|
|
||
|
|
||
Comment management by HaloScan. |
||