SO She is a manipulative power hungry woman. IE a politician.
The incentives of politics are indeed so perverted; her (assumed) growing unpopularity among clueless voters might make her a less harmful option because of the gridlock she would likely bring about--yet it is that very unpopularity which would cause her not to prevail in the election.
My view has been that Hillary would less lethal to liberty than Obama. One is that she has alienated a lot of people including members of her own party. Second, she more power hungry than ideological and will compromise if that is how she can stay in office.
At this point I am starting to wonder if she is not intentionally trying to destroy Obama as a candidate so that she can come in in four years to run again. I think she wants him to lose. I believe she is so power hungry that she would destroy her own party if it were to her benefit.
Commenting by HaloScan
