A professional and ethical psychologist would NEVER diagnose a patient without an in person interview. Lacking the face to face, in depth evaluation you end up with a combination of educated guesses and the psychologist's prejudices.
It doesn't take an interview to know that Dr Rosnah is an Islamist nutbar who won't distinguish between people who terrorize the innocent and a man of principle and courage who exposes the terrorists for the religious zealots they are.
Geert Wilder's position is rational. That there is a violent movement in Islam which uses the Koran to justify itself. He calls on Muslims to challenge this movement or be complicit in their silence.
When people won't debate, they call their opponents insane. Muslims merely need to explain why they don't vigorously challenge the violent Jihadist movement. I think it is because they silently support it.
Make no mistake my friends, take it from an apostate like me, there is no moderation in Islam. Moderate muslims are either misinformed or not knowledgeable out of ignorance of their own good books (Koran, and Hadiths) or refuse to accept what is plain and simple about their faith.
They will never recognized let alone accept that their religion has started, developed and now tries to impose its will out of force, war and retrebution. These moderates will be the first in line to defend this faith and consequently the attacks perpetuated against the western world, by denying the facts about islam.
In effect, the hardliners (fundamentalists who believe it is written to conquered the world) can sleep soundly and do whatever they want like planning other attacks and suicide bombings, for they know they have their clone so-called moderates in the west as the first defenders of the faith and consequently their active agenda of war and intimidation.
Commenting by HaloScan
