|
|
|
Wait the fuck a minute. Michelle (still the best candidate NOT running) and Hillary are ... what the fuck did this piece of shit write ... "hyperambitious? But Bill and Barack are just charismatic and charming, and have no hyper-ambitions of their own?
(is hyperambitious even a goddamn word?)
Ya know, once again, I am reminded why I have nothing reasonable to say to this gaggle of little boys, they are so fucking stupid the make Bush appear sentient.
How can you deal reasonably with men and women so devoid of logic, so lacking in common decency? The short answer -- you can't.
And who the fuck is Ledeen, a man who displays the intellectual depth of a tide pool, to claim that Hillary and Michelle are nasty?
After all that wonderful talk about Buckley following his death, he still left us with a legacy of ignorance and bigotry so astounding, so apparent and insidious that stupid people, excrutiatingly stupid people, like Jonah Goldberg and Lopez, along with this crackhead are considered the leading lights of a bankrupt ideology.
Thanks Buckley, you pissant.
HumboldtBlue |
02.29.08 - 2:42 pm | #
|
|
And who the fuck is Ledeen, a man who displays the intellectual depth of a tide pool, to claim that Hillary and Michelle are nasty?
If Hillary and Michelle were at all decent, they would be urging us to get into all kinds of pointless, unprovoked, and unwinnable wars in the Middle East.
Tom Hilton |
Homepage |
02.29.08 - 3:00 pm | #
|
|
Well, the one thing the right can't stand is an uppity woman. Michelle is an incredible speaker and has a powerful, charismatic, charming presence. How they will hate her when she is first lady.
aimai
aimai |
Homepage |
02.29.08 - 3:00 pm | #
|
|
Yeah, well, I've been figuring that this particular mode of attack would be coming if/when Obama became the front-runner or candidate. It was painfully obvious to me that Michelle Obama - who speaks her mind, is well informed on the issues, appears to have ambitions of her own and commits the cardinal sin of not standing silently behind her man at press conferences until she needs to be trotted out to prove he's not a philandering liar - was going to be tarred as the next "Hillary". And then, by extension, Obama would be the next "Bill".
They did it once, why not go for a second time? It poisons the well for her so that just in case she decides she has political ambitions of her own she has a harridan-harpy-hyperambitious-shrew image hurdle to overcome to get elected to office. It links the Obamas to the Clintons in the minds of people who are voting for Obama because they don't like the Clintons. And it gets at the sexist bits of the Dem base who really don't like "uppity wimmin" any more than their Republican counterparts do. It's all gravy for the Republicans -- linking Obama and Clinton together is all plusses and no minuses as far as the lizard brains are concerned.
If Ledeen isn't lying[*] and it really did "just strike him" then he's even dumber than I've ever given him credit for. And I have long assumed that various stumps found in the public park were probably more intelligent than Michael Ledeen.
[*] I also always assume that Ledeen is lying. So it may have "just struck him" in the sense that it "just struck him" that now was the time to start flogging this.
NonyNony |
02.29.08 - 3:44 pm | #
|
|
Republicans=Misogynists?
Why, yes. Yes, they are.
Let us not forget:
Republicans=racists? Republicans=war-mongers? And; Republicans=stunted emotional development?
MileHi Hawkeye |
02.29.08 - 8:58 pm | #
|
|
Those uppity ill trained American bitches do not know their place like the obedience trained women Ledeen needs to actually feel like a "man".
It has got to suck to be Ledeen and know that others must be less on purpose so that he can maintain a false image that he is respectable.
Silver Owl |
03.01.08 - 8:52 am | #
|
|
|
Commenting by HaloScan
|