|
|
|
I am sure that the implication of the post is not to imply that only men are servant leaders, but simply that in their short sightedness the BBC neglected to include women in their greatest "man" list. I think this oversight points out an important point about servant leadership and that is that true servant leadership is not about "greatness" as it is normally used when applied to leadership. Nor is it about gender. I was prevlidged to attend a talk by a woman who called herself a Feminist Theologian who's name I can not recall. Her talk was basically about the difference between the leadership of men and women. She made a great point about who we normally think of when she asked people to name good leaders. I can't recall the exact names mentioned, but I am sure many of the BBC list was included. What she pointed out was why aren't women thought of when we think of leaders? She said it much better then I could, but as I understood her explanation it has much to do with our male dominated hierarcies and how men tend to rise to the top of these hieracies. She also pointed out some great examples of leadership in woman inclusive organazions (who unfortunately I can't remember the names). She explained that in these organizations, it isn't typical to have one individual singled out as deserving credit for greatness, but that the leadership is shared amoung many individuals. It seems to me that this type of leadership is far more in line with the idea of servant leadership then singling out individuals worthy of the designation as greatest. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commenting by HaloScan |