|
|
|
The question I have is why does a servant leadership organization need to bring someone from outside the organization in to lead it? My vision of servant leadership, which may not be the correct one, is that servant leadership is done best by those within the organization because those are the folks that should understand best what the needs of the organization are. The idea of bringing in a CEO from a Fortune 500 company seems to imply (maybe I am wrong) that the most important need is to maximize profits and efficiency (at least that is what I assume is required to make the Fortune 500 list). Maximizing profits is what most organizations strive for, but it is not what servant leadership is really about. Fiscal responsibility is necessary for an organization to exist, but not profit maximization. It may be possible to bring in someone from the outside to help bring in new visions for the organization, but before that option is choosen, there should be a consensous amoung the members that that is what is needed to keep the organization healthy. I also believe that rather investing training on outside leaders, training should be invested on the existing membership to help them fill the needs of leadership at the organization. One of the best ways to be trained is to rotate the leadership responsibilities to the membership. Them's my thoughts for what they are worth. |
|
|
Commenting by HaloScan |