I love you, Tom.
In a fraternal, platonic sort of way, understand.
Scott,
Smoooooooch.
Wonder how much your attorney fees will be??
dude,
Since there's absolutely zero doubt that Palin (or, rather, Palin's gullible donors) would end up paying those fees, I haven't wasted too many synapse firings on the issue.
I suspect that the discovery phase would be very expensive colonoscopy for her.
Tom, is there anything you can do about that goddamn ad page that comes up when I click on your website? I don't mind having to click on "skip the ad" to get back to you, but several times now I get stuck on that page with no way to get back except to log all the way off the internet and get back on (which I always do because I like your site). It's just a royal pain in the ass.
So how much do you think your legal fees would run?
I guess your posting would mean something if had actually had the balls to state factual comments about Palin. But you havent, so this is just bloviating.
ESNelson,
Actually, that's the whole point.
I did exactly the same thing as the blogger whom Palin's attorney threatened, explicitly and by name, and in fact I cited that blogger, Shannyn Moore.
If Moore is guilty of anything, so am I. If Palin has a case against Moore, she has a case against me, too. But Palin has no case against Moore, nor does she have a case against me.
The whole thing is a SLAPP, minus, so far, the actual suit. Palin's attorney is issuing empty threats in the hope that fear of big legal costs will shut his client's critics up.
Fuck that noise. Bring it on.
Yeah, you are so edgy. Please stop trying to ride on the coat tails of others - -grow a pair. So far, there no need for anyone to shut you up. Quit playing the false victim.
ESNelson,
Since you're apparently unwilling to buy a clue for yourself, I'll souvenir you a free one:
This is my blog, and I'll "play" any way I like on it.
Second Free Clue:
However, what I'm not "playing" is "the victim," false or otherwise.
Quite the contrary: Playing the victim would be saying "poor me, that bad ol' Sarah Palin won't let me say what I want to say."
I'm saying exactly what I want to say, and I will continue to do so, and if anyone has a problem with that their sole remedy is to utilize the kissing space I've reserved on my ass for such contingencies.
ESN - Do you actually have something to say besides "... I, I disagree!" I'm so sick of Republicans defending Palin. But even more sickening is the empty defense, the one that screams to all who read it that you're angry but have no argument.
The best thing for Repubs to do would be to move on, from Bush, from Palin, from ALL the fakesters. Seriously! How about throwing your support behind someone who actually stands for something, and has done so for 25+ years? I'm speaking of course, of Ron Paul.
Sorry Thomas, but to have anyone kiss your ass, you will have to remove Shannyn's coat tails that are covering it...such false bravado. Again, what cutting edge piece have you done....nothing...except the obligatory "I did the same thing Shannyn did" "look at me, look at me...I am on the cutting edge of the blogosphere." Whatever.
Liz, you are so far removed from the essence of this conversation, that you can keep your ignorant comments to yourself.....you are not even on the field of play in your uneducated assumptions.
ES,
The only one throwing around terms like "edgy" and "cutting edge" here is you. Nice try at attributing that attitude to me, but it just doesn't fly (hint: My general approach is "retro," not "cutting edge").
You flapping your gums and me letting you embarrass yourself (if you've got the brains to understand the nature of embarrassment, that is) is not a "conversation."
I guess I could throw you a rope by deleting your comments, but I'm just not a very nice guy that way.
Retro is the new edgy!
retro....what a farce your writings are....like I said, keep thinking yourself as some retro trailblazer, screaming look at me look at me...when you make the bigtime, maybe someone will know your name....but for now, suffice it to say, your out of your league riding on the accomplishments of others who actually have the bravado to really write something meaningful.
ESN,
Where in hell do you get this stuff? "Trailblazer?" That's all in your head, dude, not mine.
Another clue for you: Blogging is almost always a secondary phenomenon -- not "riding on the accomplishments of others," precisely, but rather commenting on the actions of others.
You want me to say I'm a hack? Fine, I'm a hack. Happy now?
You're a retro, edgy hack!
Wow ESN, what a surprise, more rhetoric from the mindless trolling dolt. Obviously you're nothing more than a troll with a vendetta and no ability to think or express any sort of reasoning beyond callow insults. If you have some personal issue with the author, grow a pair and take it up with him personally.
Good clip from a great movie. That is how you deal with cowardly bullies, head on. The only question is, who are the cowardly bullies?
Commenting by HaloScan
