|
|
|
No, no, no, no, no.
You've got it wrong. Freeh has it wrong. 9/11 was an inside job. The hijackers are patsies. They were supposed to be visible. It was their job.
Those of us who support 9/11 Truth hope the cover up artists don't use Able Danger to help the cover up.
Love the Able Danger Blog, but I think if you keep on doing your research, you'll see how the pieces fit together.
Have your read Webster Tarpley: 9/11 Synthetic Terror? Have you read D R Griffin: "9/11 Commission: Omissions and Distortions"?
Don't your realize that the 9/11 Commission covered up a heck of a lot more than Able Danger?!!!!
BG |
Homepage |
11.26.05 - 4:45 pm | #
|
|
As Tony Shaffer himself has noted, along with Christopher Shays and others, if they didn't cover Able Danger accurately, what else did they miss? Able Danger may be more of an opening than a coverup of a coverup.
bb |
11.26.05 - 5:00 pm | #
|
|
Commenting by HaloScan
|