When Able Danger identified "Mohamed Atta" in 2000, did they identify him as Mohamed el-Amir? Does this matter? e.g. Roemer, Gorton say that "Atta" was not identified, but they say nothing about "el-Amir." Is this splitting hairs too thinly?
bb | 11.28.05 - 10:38 am | #

I would put nothing past the 9/11 Commission. All they've done is spin on Able Danger from the start.
Mike K | Homepage | 11.28.05 - 10:43 am | #