The reference to the 3(c) exception to law governing retention of information, the narcotics exception, is intriguing at a minimum. Consider Daniel Hopsicker's work in that light.
The section 3(c) Shaffer quotes specifically refers to both terrorism AND narcotics. Clearly, the terrorism clause applies here. Bringing up Hopsicker is like asking McKinney to make the case for you.
Good point, but I do recall Shaffer referring not only to terrorism, but terrorism and narcotics in the oral testimony, and it seemed to me to raise a question worth answering. Some of that info in the year leading up to the attacks could have been related to Hopsicker's work, maybe not, to be sure.
p.s. re: McKinney, at least she was seated and respectful, which is more than you can say for what it looked like at least two-thirds of the absent House Armed Services Committee.
The reason the CIA doesnt want Able Danger to be investigated is because Atta and the other terrorists were trained at the Huffman Aviation School in Venice, FL , a company owned by Wally Hilliard, who had one of his planes seized for heroin trafficking check it out !http://64.70.236.57/08172005.html
Commenting by HaloScan
