"There is no doubt that the events of 9/11 flowed from an immense chain of actions in many places by a host of actors." If one accepts the hypothetical record of incompetence attributed to the Bush administration, and the almost perfectly executed "immense chain of actions", one would seem to have a limited choice of architects (or "architectural firms")
with sufficient means to carry out the attacks. Among those, preferred status must go to those sufficiently well introduced to Bush administration policy discussions to anticipate the administration's alacrity in using 9/11 to "sell" the invasion of Iraq. If moreover the partitioning of Iraq into impotent but mutually hostile mini-states was a desired outcome rather than a failure, the number of
candidate "agencies" is reduced to a handful. Alternatively, the hypothetical Bush administration incompetence may have included an error in subcontracting a project which was concluded with greater
lethality than per contract.
Who knows, even the official conspiracy theory could be true, although by now it seems the least plausible hypothesis, even for those who lusting to cut Osama's beard with Ockham's razor.
So Bush & Co are too stupid to have planned and carried out 9/11, but unlike _any other administration that might have been in office_ they're the crass ones . . . please.
Commenting by HaloScan
