|
|
|
Ain't neither one of the two Republicraps running going seat anything other than a liberal black robed tyrant on SCOTUS. Bush made sure of that when he saw to getting that RINO from Penn reelected to the Senate.
Res Ipsa |
10.25.04 - 4:14 pm | #
|
|
I was thinking the exact damn same thing Nate. That's scary, thinking like you, that is.
Gregg |
Homepage |
10.25.04 - 4:28 pm | #
|
|
sure.. but that's reality... I'm talkin about perception.
Nate |
Homepage |
10.25.04 - 4:28 pm | #
|
|
Several big players in the Libertarian camp have come out swinging for Bush. They "Get It", I wish some *other* Libertarians would.
Libertarian Party founder backs Bush The good folks at FreeRepublic were kind enough to bombard Hospers with e-mails and phone calls, several posted replies by him authenticating the letter.
Neil Schulman endorses Bush
Excerpts;
"George W. Bush is qualified to exercise the executive authority of the presidency and Michael Badnarik isn't."
"George W. Bush has correctly concluded that this war can't be won by even the most draconian assaults on our personal liberties in an attempt to create an impregnable "Fortress America," and he has instead decided to remove the war from New York City and Washington DC back to the region that spawned and supports the Islamic crusaders."
I guess Farah's and Boortz's endorsements are old ne
Bill |
10.25.04 - 5:23 pm | #
|
|
That should be "old news".
Bill |
10.25.04 - 5:30 pm | #
|
|
Oh.. they're gonna get it all right...
Right up the keister.
Nate |
Homepage |
10.25.04 - 6:09 pm | #
|
|
Well, some libertarians idiotic love of open borders (the denigrating reference to "Fortress America") seem to trump everything else for them. It was this kind of stupid internecine fighting that caused me to drop my membership in the Libertarian Party. But I'm still not interested in being a quasi-socialist, or voting for my own destruction by supporting one.
Larry |
10.25.04 - 11:08 pm | #
|
|
Larry,
Vox and I already destroyed the open border position.
I'll bet if you take a look at the republican agenda you'll find things just as stupid... Many of them already passed.
The patriot act... no child left behind... just two huge examples.
Nate |
Homepage |
10.25.04 - 11:44 pm | #
|
|
No one's arguing that W2 will be a great presidency, they're making the point that a Kerry presidency would be a clusterfuck of such monumental proportions that the "suck" of those four years would be so great that not even light could escape it's gravitational pull...
With W, we'll just pull the sheets out of our ass and get on with things in 2008.
Zod |
Homepage |
10.25.04 - 11:52 pm | #
|
|
There's almost certainly going to be another revolution (the War For Southern Independence was only a warm-up).
Revolutions happen when the people get sick and tired of being sucked dry by Der Schtaat so its figureheads can bribe themselves into indefinate power.
The polls indicate the working poor want Bush, while the LAFSOBs living off of them thoughtlessly want sKerry.
Makes the freaking Mason-Dixon line look pretty fine.
Earnest Truth |
Homepage |
10.25.04 - 11:55 pm | #
|
|
I don't see it as a North/South war this time. I see it as a Rural/Urban, Security vs Liberty type of deal.
More and more freedom will be taken away, and more and more of us will simply leave the cities.
I'm not saying John Titor was a time traveler, but I very much agree with his assesments.
Nate |
Homepage |
10.26.04 - 7:08 am | #
|
|
I over heard that bit about Rhinquist on the radio this yesterday. I have to say that one of the first things I thought was "oh crap. we're never going to get a conservative in that spot."
Will |
Homepage |
10.26.04 - 10:43 pm | #
|
|
Commenting by HaloScan
|