mentalblog.com comments:
The first excerpt appears to be a trivialization of depression and a profound misunderstanding of antidepressants. (They aren't "happy pills.")
The second excerpt might have something to do with the causes depression and it might not. Frankly, I'm not inclined to trust amateurs who declare a reason for things like mental illness which we are only just beginning to understand.
What people often get most unnerved about at this point is what this means personally. There's a zillion of these subtle disorders, and none of them existed 30 years ago. None of them had names then, and they all have names now, and we're just going to keep discovering more and more of them. Eventually, every single one of us will have two or three of those labels. [laughter] At some point, that's going to stop being the biology of "them and their diseases," and it's going to be the biology of "what makes us us."
http://ffrf.org/fttoday/2003/apr...php?
ft=sapolsky
What percentage of your friends are living "The American Dream"?
0% of mine.
Most commenters on this phenomenon get two things confused: there is clinical depression, and then there is situational depression. The former is a serious medical disorder, characterized most typically by the person's inability to lift out of the depression even when everything in their life is going fine. For those, medications can be a necessary (though as more and more research is demonstrating, not sufficient alone) part of a broad therapy regimine.
The latter group, however, is according to a growing body of evidence medicated too quickly and too much. For such people, behavioral therapies, changes in diet, nutritional supplementation, exercise, sunshine, and spiritual work are really all that is required. Resort to medication in such instances is most often a quck-fix that over time turns out to not be such a fix; by altering their neurochemistry under less than necessary circumstances, they may be permanently creating a need for medication simply to remain in balance.
Sadly, such a nuanced approach to the issue doesn't make for grabbing headlines, so the public remains terribly misinformed. And that leads to truly ill people being stigmatized and made to feel they are somehow morally deficient for having sought out treatment in the first place.
Unfortunately, a solution is going to require a complex approach. Though the medical establishment and the pharmaceutical companies contribute to this problem, the roots run far deeper. For example, most insurance companies impose severe restrictions on coverage for therapy -- often no more than 15 or 20 visits per year. So doctors, who understand that getting into a therapy relationship with a patient in order to really get at the root of their problems and work with them to implement non-medication approaches to resolving the depression, feel that they have no choice: medication does lift depression, even in people who are not technically clinically depressed. If a doctor is faced with a patient who is truly depressed, with the depression causing other health problems and contributing to a downward spiral in his or her life, but knows that insurance will not cover nearly enough visits or time to properly set up a complete program to help the person get out of the depression and stay out, the doctor may feel the compassionate thing to do is to prescribe medication. Medication that insurance will cover, and that only requires occasional visits to monitor the patient.
It's a terrible situation. I honestly don't know how we're going to get out of it.
Commenting by HaloScan
