Beautifully done. Nice job. And a great song.


No, it certainly doesn't suck. The images and the song go together remarkably well; all too well, in fact. I'm going to link to it; and I never link to anything that sucks.


Thanks Dale.


Gravatar excellent work!


Gravatar WOW! Awesome, powerful, impressive!


Gravatar Thanks for the compliments.


Gravatar Good job! Nicely edited...


Gravatar Navyswan,
Make another and another! Very nice pictures and a very apt song! If you don't mind can publish this video in my "Other People's Videos" page on A Poetic Justice?

Again, nicely done my friend.

Peace.


Gravatar "...can I publish..."


Gravatar poetryman,
Yes, you can publish it. I'm glad you like it.


Gravatar Yes, it is a noble attempt and I can surely see your 'heart' went into it. But I can say this, your attempt to garner emotions with men clutching their babies do know what they are fighting for and what they have fought for. For you....for your freedom to gather all the talking points you feel fit to produce your video in an effort to support your beliefs. Yes...you're freedom. I can see you are advertising the protest March 17th....I'll be there protecting the wall. You'd best not spit on me.


Gravatar cllucas,

Where to start. There was so much wrong with your comment...

1. You are obviously not intel.
Two reasons I say this:

(a.) You are going to be guarding a wall which probably makes you an MP or an MA (according to the branch).

(b.) You have poor observational skills. If you would have just looked to your right. Yes, of the internet page, not your physical right. Just beneath the part that says "contributors", there is something written that you may need to read.

2. This is an untrue and poorly written sentence:

"But I can say this, your attempt to garner emotions with men clutching their babies do know what they are fighting for and what they have fought for."

Maybe you should have tried, "But I can say this, your attempt to garner emotions with men clutching their babies did not work because they do know..."

Other than the fact that this sentence was unclear, it is untrue. It is untrue because you cannot make a claim to what every military person knows or did know.

3. Another unclear and untrue sentence:

"For you....for your freedom to gather all the talking points you feel fit to produce your video in an effort to support your beliefs."

Ok, no one fighting in the Iraq war is protecting any right of mine. Iraq was never a threat; therefore, my rights were never threatened. Actually, I cannot think of a contemporary American war that was waged for the reasons of protecting "rights."

You can disagree I guess, but while you claim you were fighting a country that had no WMD and that had no link to Al-Qaeda and a war that was preemptive, unnecessary, and illegal, the citizens of this country have been spied on, habeas corpus has been trampled on, the unconstitutional acts of Congress(ex, Patriot Acts I,II, and the Military Commissions Act) have been passed, etc...
Sorry if I find it hard to believe that YOU are fighting for MY rights.

Truly, the only way our rights can be taken away is by our own government. We are the keepers of our rights in this country. Once the citizens hand their rights over to a third party (ex, the military) to "protect", then they have surrendered those rights. Because, the only people that are going to protect those rights are the people themselves. It has been shown over and over in history.

4. You said this:

"Yes...you're freedom. I can see you are advertising the protest March 17th..."

One, I actually like that. "I am freedom", thanks for the compliment. Ok, I know you are just a bad speller and that isn't what you meant by, "Yes...you're freedom.", but it does fit with point number 3.

As for the March on the 17th, I hope that I can make it and actually be the protector of my own rights as I have lost faith in anyone else doing that job for me.

5. You repeated this lie:

"I'll be there protecting the wall. You'd best not spit on me."

Ahhh, that rumor has been debunked so many times.


Gravatar Funny, from everything I've seen there is more documented proof that anti-war protesters are the one who've been spit on, for practicing their constitutionally protected right to petition the government, then there ever has been of Vets being spit on.

In fact the only people I can think of right off the bat that have ever spit on the troops, are the ones occupying the highest offices in the land...




Name:

Email:

URL:

Comment:  ? 

 

Commenting by HaloScan