Well the Echo prints enough of your articles anyway. Why do you need this weblog when you get this free publicity anyway? Is it now a liberal newspaper and why put up with so much stick from a weblog? I don't think it's doing your reputation any good whatsoever. But that's just my opinion.
Andy | Email | Homepage | 11.07.04 - 10:50 am | #

Also, I'm sure that the Echo make all your articles very clear in the fresh milk catagory. It's a bit hard on them to say they are not clear in what you say. They have a good habit of editing and changing views when it comes to members of the public so us peasants have to put up with the sterilised version.
Andy | Email | Homepage | 11.07.04 - 11:36 am | #

Keep with it Sandra!

You are right: "the public has had enough of bland politicians who speak via spin doctors and present a sanitised face to the world."

Now...if only Sarah Teather (my MP) would learn this lesson.
rob d | Email | Homepage | 11.08.04 - 12:02 pm | #

It's amazing how one says all these things only to be corrupted by the system once they are in power. Look at Blair and co. They said they were going to restore honesty in politics and end what they called the culture of sleaze. Instead, they are doing the same things themselves and are more sleazy and shifty too. The Lib Dems will go exactly the same way, if elected which thankfully is unlikely. They have a history of being anarchical at a local level and like to be control freaks.
Clive | Email | Homepage | 11.08.04 - 3:26 pm | #

My nelly will be pleased.

Surely it's better to vote for people who *might* not be sleazy and shifty, rather than two parties who have already *proven* to be sleazy and shifty?
Russell | Email | Homepage | 11.12.04 - 9:53 am | #

That's your choice Russell. The party that might be sleazy preaches tactical voting to get in. Mrs G. knows all too well about that.
Clive | Email | Homepage | 11.14.04 - 1:31 pm | #