|
|
|
What exactly are those evils? |
|
Tell you what, why don't you pick up the phone and call your opponent to find out what's going on so you can be in the 99.99% of real people. Why believe what the newspapers say? |
|
#: So have the newspapers just made up the fact that the Conservative (as that is apparently the only name we can call them now) asked Mrs Gidley for a debate? I very much doubt that somehow! |
|
I'm sure Sandra would relish the opportunity to debate the issues with one of Michael Howard's Tories. Once their their rhetoric and electioneering has been blown away, it is clear that the Tories do not have a leg to stand on. |
|
Don't know, you tell me. Newspapers are there to produce stories as we are always told. Maybe a debate would be better then one of your greasy and hypothetical newsletters that come onto my doormat. That's all rhetoric and fiction. |
|
...and Ms Noakes and the Conservatives produce material that informs in an unbias and totally accurate way of course! |
|
Are some of you thick or what? |
|
Is you opponent Time nice but Dim? that would explain it |
|
Superstar is quite thick to think that the Advertiser gives space to the Tory. They do to anyone who wants to make a view. If you want gullability, go to the Liberal-minded Echo instead. |
|
Superstar's email address seems to indicate he is Tony Barron, Mrs Gidley's paid employee. Is that taxpayer's money that's being spent to compose ill-spelt comments? |
|
Colin, Even if 'Superstar' is Tony Barron, the posting time of 0746am gives most of us a clue that whoever sent the email probably wasn't working at his paid employment at that time. And if he was I think that Tony should have a word with Mrs Gidley about his working hours! |
|
Nick: Why don't you stop surfing the web and get down to some work instead. |
|
Might it be that Tony was working in his volunteer time for the MP? |
|
No, Tony was probably working towards creating more mischief. |
|
You and him have a lot in common then Clive!! |
Commenting by HaloScan.com |