|
|
|
You deserve more comments ...
I'm constantly hearing from liberal friends about how "the elites" -- by whom they mean, rich Republicans and never Barbra Streisand, Noam Chomsky, or George Soros -- used to have a sense of "noblesse oblige", by which they mean that even rich Republicans once upon a time used to actually serve in military combat (and implying that this hasn't happened since the Korean War.)
Pouncer |
Homepage |
12.08.04 - 8:59 am | #
|
|
You deserve more comments ...
I'm constantly hearing from liberal friends about how "the elites" -- by whom they mean, rich Republicans and never Barbra Streisand, Noam Chomsky, or George Soros -- used to have a sense of "noblesse oblige", by which they mean that even rich Republicans once upon a time used to actually serve in military combat (and implying that this hasn't happened since the Korean War.)
Pouncer |
Homepage |
12.08.04 - 8:59 am | #
|
|
This is irritating on a number of levels, but for one -- and for the purposes of this comment -- it's irritating that my liberal friends expect Republicans to value the military even though liberals and Democrats seem not to; while they expect the military to be a democratizing egalitarian force for enabling ethnic minorities, immigrants, women, gays, and the poor to climb the ladder toward the Ameircan dream; while ignoring the fact that better fed, presumably better-bred, and more expensively educated "elites" who might serve (*cough, cough *K*E*R*R*Y* four months* cough *Quayle* golf cough cough) at best tend to degrade the image of the military's meritocratic culture.
So, to the pith -- what do you think of "elites" being recruited at
Pouncer |
Homepage |
12.08.04 - 8:59 am | #
|
|
This is irritating on a number of levels, but for one -- and for the purposes of this comment -- it's irritating that my liberal friends expect Republicans to value the military even though liberals and Democrats seem not to; while they expect the military to be a democratizing egalitarian force for enabling ethnic minorities, immigrants, women, gays, and the poor to climb the ladder toward the Ameircan dream; while ignoring the fact that better fed, presumably better-bred, and more expensively educated "elites" who might serve (*cough, cough *K*E*R*R*Y* four months* cough *Quayle* golf cough cough) at best tend to degrade the image of the military's meritocratic culture.
So, to the pith -- what do you think of "elites" being recruited at
Pouncer |
Homepage |
12.08.04 - 8:59 am | #
|
|
Commenting by HaloScan
|