I'm in on it, but until I regain employment , may I use my wife's acceptance of the cost-effectiveness argument, which allows purchasing re-loading materials as a substitute?
Still need to get a match-accurate something in .223 that's CA legal.
-keith in mtn. view | Homepage | 04.06.05 - 14:16:51 | #

Good luck with CA legal part of the equation... Why .223? Is that a match requirement?
Zendo Deb | Homepage | 04.06.05 - 14:40:04 | #

It's a little painful to not be acknowledged as the day's founder.

Last year I got 141 Blogs to participate. Even Kim du Toit acknowledges me as the founder.
Aaron's cc: | Homepage | 04.07.05 - 17:54:26 | #

We love you Aaron, nice to see you back! I'll update my Blog!
ZD - .223 (or 5.56 nato) is just more accurate in a modern AR than .30 is in an M1 Garand shooting Service Rifle - something on the order of 30% without doing a lot more rifle-tuning and ammo-tuning. They passed the CA ban with two extensions before I knew it's complete ramifications - and I missed getting grandfathered-in with an AR.
So now we have to overturn it!
-keith in mtn. view | Homepage | 04.07.05 - 20:08:04 | #

And I did it. With the Finance Minister in tow on a shopping expedition for women's swimsuits, successful at Ross, successful, we went into a Big-5 sporting goods, and there was a Swiss K-31...and with Finance Minister's approval, now comes the 10-day waiting period.
-keith in mtn. view | Homepage | 04.10.05 - 21:43:15 | #

I'd love to participate in BAG Day on Apr 15, but I've already purchased two revolvers this year to date, both S&W: a Model 19 .357 Magnum and Model 29 .44 Magnum (http://milehighview.blogspot.com/2005/04/good- sidearm-for-bear-country.html).

I encourage everyone to arm themselves against the criminal element. See you at the range!

[ZDeb - turned URL into hyperlink]

Edited By Siteowner
barry | Homepage | 04.13.05 - 04:41:39 | #

That's good enough to claim participation, since a lot of folks have already purchased their firearm
Zendo Deb | Homepage | 04.13.05 - 16:04:27 | #