<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Comments for alfredhw - HaloScan.com</title>
    <link>http://www.haloscan.com/</link>
    <description>Latest comments for alfredhw. Syndicated by HaloScan</description>
    <generator>http://www.haloscan.com/</generator>
    
    <item>
      <title>Thread: 7623850513537754527. Post by Alfred</title>
      <link>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/alfredhw/7623850513537754527/?src=hsr#806192</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 08:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
      <comments>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/alfredhw/7623850513537754527/?src=hsrs#806192</comments>
      <guid>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/alfredhw/7623850513537754527/?src=hsrs#806192</guid>
      <description>...and that would be the problem.  I'm pretty sure we had stacks of 10/9/9.  Well spotted...</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thread: 7623850513537754527. Post by russ</title>
      <link>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/alfredhw/7623850513537754527/?src=hsr#806190</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 08:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
      <comments>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/alfredhw/7623850513537754527/?src=hsrs#806190</comments>
      <guid>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/alfredhw/7623850513537754527/?src=hsrs#806190</guid>
      <description>&quot;The much deeper stacks of buildings seemed to be the culprit.&quot;

Um... and you say you were following the rules correctly? Why were the stacks of buildings deeper? Perhaps it behooves your group to read page 3 of the rules again?

&quot;Shuffle the building tiles and place in 4 face down stacks of 7 buildings each. With 4 players, place all 4 stacks on the game board; with 3 players, place 3 stacks</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thread: 7623850513537754527. Post by Alfred</title>
      <link>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/alfredhw/7623850513537754527/?src=hsr#806188</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 07:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
      <comments>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/alfredhw/7623850513537754527/?src=hsrs#806188</comments>
      <guid>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/alfredhw/7623850513537754527/?src=hsrs#806188</guid>
      <description>Aye, and verily.  It just felt like the end would never come, and that seemed to be the general opinion.  The much deeper stacks of buildings seemed to be the culprit.  I certainly intend to revisit it...</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thread: 7623850513537754527. Post by russ</title>
      <link>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/alfredhw/7623850513537754527/?src=hsr#806172</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 20:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
      <comments>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/alfredhw/7623850513537754527/?src=hsrs#806172</comments>
      <guid>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/alfredhw/7623850513537754527/?src=hsrs#806172</guid>
      <description>I found that Stone Age works well with 2 or 3, not just 4. Anna and I played a lot of games with 2.

Just to check the obvious: was your 3-player group playing correctly with the 3-player rules, and only using 3 instead of 4 hut stacks, and restricting the number of players allowed at a resource to 2?</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thread: 7623850513537754527. Post by Iain</title>
      <link>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/alfredhw/7623850513537754527/?src=hsr#806154</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
      <comments>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/alfredhw/7623850513537754527/?src=hsrs#806154</comments>
      <guid>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/alfredhw/7623850513537754527/?src=hsrs#806154</guid>
      <description>Sorry again for messing up that move. I think I did that last time I played!

Quality posting as ever...

My friend Steve *really* likes two player Stone Age. He says it has hidden depths. I haven't tried it, so can't comment for myself.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thread: 3935628174807600508. Post by Alfred Wallace</title>
      <link>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/alfredhw/3935628174807600508/?src=hsr#805914</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 05:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
      <comments>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/alfredhw/3935628174807600508/?src=hsrs#805914</comments>
      <guid>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/alfredhw/3935628174807600508/?src=hsrs#805914</guid>
      <description>Curses!</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thread: 3935628174807600508. Post by russ</title>
      <link>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/alfredhw/3935628174807600508/?src=hsr#805899</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 21:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
      <comments>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/alfredhw/3935628174807600508/?src=hsrs#805899</comments>
      <guid>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/alfredhw/3935628174807600508/?src=hsrs#805899</guid>
      <description>Ah, but I don't know that game. :)</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thread: 3542825154494514382. Post by Iain Cheyne</title>
      <link>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/alfredhw/3542825154494514382/?src=hsr#803639</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 03:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
      <comments>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/alfredhw/3542825154494514382/?src=hsrs#803639</comments>
      <guid>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/alfredhw/3542825154494514382/?src=hsrs#803639</guid>
      <description>I find Chess and Go really hard going too, but I find all abstract games stressful. Occasionally I'll get obsessed and play a few games at Richard's PBEM server and then realise why I can't cope with abstract games in general.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thread: 5482907749740443409. Post by Iain Cheyne</title>
      <link>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/alfredhw/5482907749740443409/?src=hsr#801212</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 03:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
      <comments>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/alfredhw/5482907749740443409/?src=hsrs#801212</comments>
      <guid>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/alfredhw/5482907749740443409/?src=hsrs#801212</guid>
      <description>40lbs! Congratulations.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thread: 113633726576755925. Post by Alfred</title>
      <link>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/alfredhw/113633726576755925/?src=hsr#801005</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 10:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
      <comments>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/alfredhw/113633726576755925/?src=hsrs#801005</comments>
      <guid>http://www.haloscan.com/comments/alfredhw/113633726576755925/?src=hsrs#801005</guid>
      <description>Haven't a clue!  You might want to try Great Hall Games in Austin; they had a copy...eight years ago?  They might not remember...</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
